Put yourself in the role of a project manager collaborating with MTD, an events company.
Considering the difficulties and problems that MTD encounters in their projects, what insights have you gained this week that could offer assistance?
If an iterative approach were employed in organizing an event as a project, what would be the consequences? Similarly, what are the implications of adopting an agile approach? If the company sought your advice, what would you recommend?
Contribute your thoughts and ideas to the discussion.
I learnt that linear and iterative methods of delivering project can use together depending.MDT could use iterative method in the project cycle where the environment becomes unstable to deliver the project.
The consequences of using iterative method in organizing an event may not deliver the project as expected.Linear method with it’s , conception, definition, deployment and transition stages of the project cycle would have delivered the event project.
As a project manager with MTD a will recommend using both approach starting with linear then as the project is going on if there are complexity then we move on to the iterative approach. We do a review to see whether we are on course in order to achieve our goal
Applying an iterative approach to organizing an event would imply focusing on a specific highly prioritized aspect of the event, getting the team to sprint on it, releasing the result to the stakeholders and users, obtaining feedback, and having another sprint session until an acceptable solution is obtained.
This process may not necessarily mean dwelling on a particular aspect of the project. It may mean working on task “A”, after getting the solution from the first iteration, we go over to task “B” given that task “B” has a higher priority than going for the second iteration of task “A”. In some cases, the second iteration of task “B” may have a higher priority than the second iteration of task “A”, in this case, the team works on the second iteration of task “B”.
I think using a hybrid approach ,that is, combining practices from both Linear and Iterative would do MTD more good. Through that process they can get feed backs from clients and stakeholders thereby improving their engagement which will at the long run lead to the growth of the Company. Through this practice they are able to tackle/manage risks which could lead to wastage of resources early and at each stage of the project rather than waiting till the end of the event.
As a project manager working with MTD, I must communicate effectively with my team. Communication breakdown is a major cause of project failure. Lessons learned as a project manager is to establish leadership which ensure synergy among the team capable of creating a healthy working environment, and knowledge sharing leading to effective communication.
It is important to know that each projects presents with it is challenges and problem. It is the duty of a project manager to foresee and identity these problems for possible resolute mitigation measures. Therefore, the choice of tools or approaches to be applied is critical to the over all success of a project.
The consequences of an iterative approach in organizing an event as a project are numerous which include; scope definition challenges, difficulty defining clear objectives, time-consuming and resources intensive.
Implication of agile approach on project leads to success in 95% of times giving its flexibility, time effectiveness and cost management. Therefore, agile approach as been discovered to be the best approach. However, agile approach performs better in hybrid with iterative approach to achieve 100% success as no project is problem free. In other words, combination of iterative and agile approaches is highly recommended for total project success.
I have learnt this week that as project manager, it is wrong to use only one approach to execute a project. Both linear and iterative approach can be used interchangeable.
* Using iterative approach to deliver an event has a consequence of assurance. This is because of the unstable environment it operates in. It might be successful it might not be successful.
*The implications of using agile approach is that it enables organisations to understand and respond to complexity and ambiguity , particularly to improve their understanding of what users need and value, through experiment carried out I in short .
I would recommend MTD to use iterative approach to execute their project.
If I am a project manager collaborating with MTD, an event company if the company approach for my recommendation. Considering both approaches, I would recommend that they combine both approaches. The project might begin with an iteration approach and lifecycle may be adopted from the iterative processes according to requirement of the organisation and the challenges and changes in its environment. This kind of mix life cycle is encountered more frequently. Combining techniques from linear and iterative has so many positive advantages which include:
Testing ideas and learning about users requirements
Improving stakeholders visibility and transparency
Providing assistance to sponsors and stakeholders
Increasing accountability
Supposed I am working with MTD, I’ll advice that using an iterative approach for events will help a lot. And by breaking the project into smaller phases will create room for adjustments at each stage. This means issues like venue or vendor problems can be fixed early without impacting the entire event.
An agile approach would give MTD more flexibility to handle changes. For example, they could easily tweak the agenda or logistics based on client feedback. This keeps the event on track and aligned with customer needs.
My advice for MTD would be to combine both methods. Use clear milestones to stay organized but stay flexible to adjust quickly when needed. Continuous communication with clients would also help ensure everything runs smoothly.
This approach can lead to better event planning, fewer surprises, and happier clients.
Ogoke Nwachukwu Felicia O Cohort 18 Team 7
As a project manager, I would advice the organization to use both Linear and iterative approaches in order to have a good result. Both approaches will plan, manage time, and mitigate risk early enough to reduce waste and have a quality deliverable timely.
Combining the Linear and iterative approaches helps to deliver a good project.
As a project manager, application of both iterative and linear method because both of these two involves planning, cost savings and time management, team work and communications in handling a project
Suleiman Yunusa
Team9
As a project manager collaborating with MTD. I’ll advice them to use both linear and iterative method because they both involves planning, time management and saves cost in handling the project.
As a project manager,I will advise the company to use both agile approach and iterative approach method because when it comes to handling projects agile help you to promote communication and teamwork while iterative make you plan and executive in allow the ongoing improvement.
Christopher Nkanta Cohort 18 Team 3
As a project manager at MTD, I intend to use an iterative approach, recognizing that this project in question is a event management project and not a construction or manufacturing. By utilizing an iterative methodology, we can conduct more experiments, thus reducing risks and losses.
The iterative methodology also provides the advantage of assuring our customers about completing our work, unlike a linear approach where completed work holds significance for project sponsors and the organization responsible for project plans and reports.
Advice as a project manager:
1. I am opting for an iterative method as it allows us to receive feedback from the environment and the people involved, which is crucial in event management.
2. Events are subject to change, making the iterative approach an important tool for adapting to evolving circumstances.
As a project manager I will advise the company to use both the iterative method and the agile method because it will be much better to the company, the sponsors, the project team, stakeholders and the project manager to adopt both. It will save more time and be more effective
The knowledge of VUCA environment and the project management approaches (linear and iterative) is very important when handling projects.
Iterative Approach Consequences
1. Gradual Improvements
2. Feedback-Oriented
While the Linear or Agile implication emphasizes flexibility, collaboration, and iterative progress
I will strongly advise the company to adopt both the iterative and the agile method because they both involves planning, time management and saves cost in handling the project.
The consequences involved in using iterative approach are continuous improvement, flexibility and faster time to market.
The agile approach emphasizes flexibility, collaboration, and customer feedback. This approach however enhances transparency which keeps everyone informed and involved. It also allows for adjustments based on feedback and changing requirements. Agile promotes teamwork and communication for a productive outcome.
I will recommend MTD to use an Hybrid method by applying both Agile and Iterative appraoch.
The knowledge of VUCA environment and the project management approaches (linear and iterative) is very important when handling projects.
The consequences of using an iterative approach:
1. Easy flexibility and adaptability to sudden changes that may arise
2.Reviews by users or stakeholders can easily be implemented
3. It may result in increased cost and time for project completion
I would recommend using a hybrid approach to handling the projects
As a project manager working with MTD, I will suggest the company to adopt the agile and the iterative approach in other to plan a successful event.
Iterative Approach Consequences
1. Gradual Improvements: The project would be planned and executed in cycles, allowing for ongoing improvements. Each iteration would deliver a partial but functional event that could be evaluated and refined.
2. Feedback-Oriented: Feedback after each iteration would inform the next cycle, ensuring that mistakes can be corrected and changes implemented early on, rather than discovering issues only at the end.
3. Flexibility: The approach would allow for adaptability as the project evolves. New requirements or external factors could be integrated more easily.
4. Higher Costs Initially: Frequent reviews and changes can lead to higher costs early in the process, as adjustments might demand additional resources.
5. Time-Consuming: While iterations provide benefits, they can also extend the project timeline, particularly if multiple cycles are required before the event is finalized.
Agile Approach Implications
Agile, which emphasizes flexibility, collaboration, and iterative progress, would have a few distinct implications for the MTD water system company:
1. Enhanced Collaboration: Agile promotes cross-functional collaboration, so teams within the company (engineering, customer service, logistics) would need to work closely and constantly communicate to adapt to changes in real time.
2. Incremental Delivery: The event would be broken into small deliverable parts (e.g., event setup, invitations, speaker arrangements), ensuring that progress can be tracked and reviewed continuously.
3. Responsiveness to Change: Agile’s emphasis on responding to changing requirements would allow the company to adjust the event’s scope, features, or timing based on feedback from stakeholders or emerging market trends.
4. Improved Customer Satisfaction: Regular feedback loops ensure that the final product or event is more aligned with customer and stakeholder expectations, which is vital in sectors like water management.
5. Possible Over-Adaptation: While flexibility is beneficial, agile can sometimes lead to “scope creep,” where continuous changes might dilute the project’s original focus if not managed carefully
As a MTD project manager I must be able to employ all method I see fit to arrive at my goal be it Linear or iterative
Njoku, Chidinma
As an MTD project manager, you will encounter issues. How you handle it matters. I recommend you use the linear and iterative project lifestyle.
adopting the iterative approach will increase accountability, transparency and testing of ideas to accelerate delivery of project output.
In management of risk involved with MTD events such as time constraint, change of scope and client’s demand. It’s important to set a balance between linear and iterative project approach. Iterative approach allows for more flexibility by allowing feedback at certain points from the clients and to know if the team are on track with the project. However, there is possibility of cancelled project if not monitored properly and as such MTD should implement the hybrid approach (blend of both linear and iterative approach) which helps to manage risks, update stakeholders, set deadlines and expected outcomes, most importantly working on multiple tasks (sprints) which are independent on each other to make the project faster and delivered at the appropriate time.
The agile method focuses on delivering value in each iteration even if the project is not exactly completed at the deadline for organisations interested in investment returns and for organisations that are so interested in time, it helps to deliver every stage of a project at a particular time frame making it the most sorted after technique although hybrid method can be adopted too. This agile method will serve for MTD since considering the fact that value and time is of essence to its clients. In my opinion, there is little or no consequence for using this approach and if they ever have doubts about this approach, I will recommend the hybrid technique for their project. This means that project levels are prioritised and while certain levels will require the adoption of scrum or sprints in order to keep clients assured and confident of the progress, some levels, will be solely dependent on the completion of these sprints.
As a project manager, one of the consequences of adopting the iterative approach to project is that the project can be broken into smaller bits, which will enable the team take it one step at a time.
Also it allows for feedback at every step, which implies corrections and adjustments can be made as the project progresses.
Projects are also handled faster using the iterative approach.
The implications therefore, is that there is no room for break in communication between the team and stakeholders or sponsors, it allows for effective communication.
Also, it gives room for continuous learning and improvements on the project.
Breaking the project into bits allows for high level of concentration in each stage, producing faster results.
As a PM for MTD which has 5 core values irrespective of our challenges we encounter as an event company adapting the iterative approach is the best with less consequences which if any of such should arise can be easily communicated to the client because getting customers feedback makes the work alot much easier for a smooth planning though we will be faced with correcting some changes but that can be easily communicated to the prospective clients with all honesty for them to know the damaHoward and how time consuming
As a project manager at MTD, an events company, we might encounter issues like changing client needs, logistical challenges, tight deadlines, and various stakeholders. Here’s how using an iterative and agile method can assist us:
1. Iterative Approach:
– Divides the project into phases for ongoing improvement.
– Enhances planning through testing and feedback at each step.
– Lowers risk by tackling problems early on.
– Offers limited flexibility for late changes, which may extend timelines.
For complex events that need gradual adjustments, such as large conferences or festivals where changes are likely, the iterative method is useful. However, it can be tough if significant changes arise late in the process.
2. Agile Approach:
– Emphasizes flexibility, quick responses, and regular client collaboration.
– Produces results in short bursts, adapting to immediate feedback.
– Risk of scope creep due to ongoing client requests.
– Needs close, frequent teamwork but allows for swift changes.
For fast-paced events with many unpredictable factors, like corporate gatherings or product launches that involve a lot of client interaction and possible last-minute changes, the agile method is ideal. MTD can keep adjusting to client needs and outside influences, ensuring the event develops smoothly.
Recommendation:
I recommend that MTD use a hybrid approach that blends both iterative and agile methods:
– Start with iterative planning for the early phases, such as logistics, budgeting, and overall event design. This ensures the main parts of the event are well-organized before moving to final execution.
– Shift to an agile approach in the later phases of planning (like design, client feedback, and vendor coordination), allowing for flexibility and real-time adjustments to client needs or unexpected challenges.
As a project manager, considering the challenges encountered by MTD, I will encourage the team to keep communication channels open, while disseminating clear and impactful information specific to the project.
The team should adopt the linear and iterative approach ensuring more productive outcomes.
Also, risk management measures should be established to modify and increase project progress.
However, adopting the iterative approach will increase accountability, transparency and testing of ideas to accelerate delivery of project output.
As a project manager, considering the challenges encountered by MTD, I will encourage the team to keep communication channels open, while disseminating clear and impactful information specific to the project and adopting the linear and iterative approach ensuring more productive outcomes.
However, adopting the iterative approach will increase accountability, transparency and testing of ideas to accelerate delivery of project output.
I’ve learned that taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project could help address challenges such as:
1. Uncertainty and changing requirements
2. Tight timelines and deadlines
3. Complexity in coordinating multiple stakeholders and vendors
4. Ensuring quality and consistency in the event experience
An iterative approach would involve:
1. Breaking down the project into smaller, manageable chunks (sprints)
2. Continuously gathering feedback and iterating on the event setup
3. Embracing flexibility and adaptability throughout the project
Implications of an iterative approach:
1. Improved responsiveness to changing requirements and stakeholder needs
2. Enhanced collaboration and communication among team members and stakeholders
3. Increased flexibility in accommodating last-minute changes or unexpected issues
4. Better management of project risks and uncertainties
Implications of an agile approach:
1. Customer-centricity and delivering value to attendees
2. Embracing change and uncertainty as opportunities for growth
3. Fostering a culture of experimentation, learning, and continuous improvement
4. Encouraging active stakeholder participation and feedback
Advice to MTD:
1. Adopt an iterative and agile mindset to event project management
2. Establish clear goals, objectives, and success metrics for each event
3. Foster collaboration and open communication among team members, stakeholders, and vendors
4. Emphasize continuous learning, improvement, and innovation in event delivery
5. Develop a robust risk management strategy to address potential challenges and uncertainties
6. Leverage technology and tools to enhance event planning, execution, and evaluation.
As a project manager, I will advice MTD not to use one approach in getting their project done, in so many circumstances adopting both the linear and iterative approach would give more productive result because the time factor that should be considered in delivery of service need to be in focus.
As a project manager I will advice the MTD company to always have it at the back of their mind that both the linear and the iterative approach should always be on ground. It is not everytime they will always have the luxury of reviewing the project at the end of completion which is the milestone,in some cases,it will have to be that the project will be iterative,considering many factors such as risk,the promptness where the sponsor wants the project delivered on time and it just needs to be reviewed in sprints so as to know if they are on track,tackle the risk and get it delivered on time as planned.
As a project manager working with MTD, I will suggest using the two approaches (Linear and Iterative) considering the difficulties that may arise in carrying out the project. Most especially the time frame of delivering the outcome to the users.
As a Project Manager collaborating with MTD, I will advise a linear and iterative approach to achieving the best result for the project. This flexibility will enable the team to react quickly to changing requirements and priorities during the project.
Ebube Usiade
COHORT 17 Team 4
As MTD project Manager in charge of project, I learned that I could utilize both the Linear and Iterative approach to a project, considering that difficulties and problems will arise in the course of executing the project.
Using an iterative method to set up an event might not be the best so far depending on the duration of the event because events might not have sprintds if it is a short time event. ewhich might require a linear method . so i would prefer both methods especially if the event is long term
As MTD project Manager in charge of project, I learned that I could utilize both the Linear and Iterative approach to a project, considering that difficulties and problems will arise in the course of executing the project.
While there are some benefits of using the iterative approach for an event planning like flexibility, risk reduction, early delivery, customer satisfaction, there are also certain negative implications that should not be ignored like –
Scope creep, lack of clear goals, inefficient use of resources and difficulty in measuring progress.
ALISON UMELO
cohort 17, team 2
Ekemini Ebong
Project Management
Cohort 17
As a project manager working closely with MTD, the events company, I have gained valuable insights into the challenges they face in delivering successful events. I understand the pain points that can make or break an event. Some of the possible challenges they face include but are not limited to:
– Inadequate planning and preparation
– Poor communication and collaboration among team members
– Insufficient risk management and contingency planning
– Inflexibility in responding to last-minute changes or unexpected issues
– Difficulty in managing multiple stakeholders and their expectations
– Inefficient use of resources and budget
To overcome these challenges, I recommend embracing an iterative approach to event setup. By breaking down tasks into smaller, manageable chunks, focusing on delivering minimum viable products (MVPs), and continuously refining tasks based on feedback, MTD can reduce risks, improve quality, and enhance collaboration.
Additionally, adopting an agile approach can help MTD respond quickly to changing requirements, prioritize tasks effectively, and foster a culture of continuous improvement. I suggest:
– Implementing iterative and agile methodologies
– Investing in project management tools and training
– Establishing clear goals, objectives, and key performance indicators(KPIs) for each event
– Improving communication and stakeholder management
– Identifying and mitigating potential risks
By taking these steps, MTD can transform their event setup processes, ensuring seamless execution, delighted attendees, and a reputation for excellence. I’m excited to collaborate with MTD to make this vision a reality.
As a project manager working collaborating with MTD and having discovered the challenges and problems they have encountered in delivering the project, I will arrange a meeting, where we are going to brainstorm on the possible steps and measures to take to address and arrests the situations on ground. Map out a work programme using the iterative method where we will be meeting very 2 weeks to review our progress and consider next steps to be taken.
Using the iterative approach the consequences will be unstable changes, unexpected and frequent variations and not being able to predict the development and change in the environment.
With the agile approach the team will be able to work in short mini-projects or sprints, have limited amount of work targeted, become more productive and are able to reprioritise and change direction quickly.
I will surely recommend the company to adopt the iterative approach and deal with the present work challenges facing them.
As a project Manager working with MTD an events company, I learned that I can incorporate both the Linear and Iterative approach to a project for ease, considering that difficulties and problems may arise in the course of executing the project.
While there are some benefits of using the iterative approach for an event planning like flexibility, risk reduction,early delivery,customer satisfaction, there are also certain negative implications that should not be ignored like
Scope creep, lack of clear goals,inefficient use of resources and difficulty in measuring progress.
Louis Amos COHHORT 17
The hard skills required in project management are multiple and diverse, from technical abilities, such as proficiency in project planning software, to skills related to project execution such as budget management, risk assessment, quality assurance methodologies, and scheduling techniques.
I learnt that to be a competent project manager, one have to build his or her own toolkit of proven methods and techniques. Equally important is knowing how to use them to get the best result in different circumstances (either linear or iterative).
For setting up an event As a manager for MTD, I will either go with a step-by-step approach or a flexible one:
Step-by-Step Approach:
Plan each part of the event carefully, making improvements along the way.
LYDIA EHEBHO
As a project manager collaborating with MTD
As a project manager working with MTD, the events company, I’ve learned that taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project could have several benefits:
– Flexibility: Embracing change and adapting to new requirements or unexpected issues.
– Improved communication: Enhanced collaboration among stakeholders, vendors, and team members.
– Risk mitigation: Identifying and addressing potential risks earlier, reducing last-minute surprises.
– Better stakeholder management: Involving stakeholders throughout the process, ensuring their needs are met.
An agile approach would imply:
– Breaking down the event setup into smaller, manageable tasks
– Prioritizing tasks based on importance and urgency
– Focusing on delivering a minimum viable product (MVP) for the event, with room for iteration and improvement
– Embracing a culture of experimentation, learning, and continuous improvement
If I were asked to advise MTD, my advice would be:
1. Start small: Experiment with agile practices on a limited scale before scaling up.
2. Foster a culture of collaboration and open communication.
3. Emphasize flexibility and adaptability in the face of change.
4. Prioritize risk management and mitigation.
5. Focus on delivering value to stakeholders and attendees.
6. Continuously review and assess progress, making adjustments as needed.
7. Invest in training and development for team members to enhance their agile skills.
By adopting an iterative and agile approach, MTD can improve its event setup process, reduce risks, and increase stakeholder satisfaction.
I cannot agree less. This is quite detailed
As a PM collaborating with MTD, I would apply the linear lifecycle to the water supply project’s execution. This is due to the fact that the linear cycle consists of three stages: the beginning, which is all about the idea and plan; the middle, which is all about the specifics of how the project will be executed; and the end, which is the distribution of the project’s outcome to the sponsors or stakeholders. When the aim of the project is to guarantee that the end user receives the best care and attention as well as benefits from the project, an iterative approach to its management can be employed, which is where feedback comes in. which is why feedback is crucial because it aids in managing and reducing any potential hazards. With resource levelling, course corrections are also accomplished within scope and budget. By employing the linear cycle, the MTD might be Although they might have a linear lifecycle, being adaptable and changing with the times will help them stay competitive and remain inventive. Use an iterative strategy; they would perform better in risk detection, prompt risk reduction, and having Feedback: After sprints are established, tasks are divided into smaller projects, allowing for more frequent feedback and regular team meetings to chart the best course.
For setting up an event As a manager for MTD, I will either go with a step-by-step approach or a flexible one:
1. Step-by-Step Approach:Plan each part of the event carefully, making improvements along the way.
2. Flexible Approach: Stay open to changes and adjust plans quickly based on feedback.
Advice:
– Use a mix of both: Start with a clear plan, then be ready to change as needed.
– Keep talking: Regularly update everyone involved and learn from each event to do better next time.
As a collaborative Project manager with MTD, an events management company, I would advise that they think out of the box. The linear approach which is straightforward can be used, however, one cannot wait till completion of the water project to now realise that there were issues that need resolving.
So, an iterative approach would be included shortly after the beginning of the linear.
Different teams will be set up and responsible for sprints providing feedback on a biweekly (every 2 weeks) basis. This would help with risk identification and mitigation.
Feedback ( through client satisfaction surveys, team SMART check-in meetings, random vendor engagement feedback etc) would be collected from the sprint teams and findings presented to the stakeholders in a diplomatic way, because I wouldn’t want them to terminate the contract set in motion. This will also help accommodate changes in course with resource levelling.
As a PM working in collaboration with MTD, i would implement the linear lifecycle in the execution of the water supply project. This is because the linear cycle has the 3 stages which is the Beginning stage which is all about the idea, the conception of the plan, then we have the Middle stage which is all about the detailed process of how the project will be carried out and the End stage which is where the sponsors or stakeholders are given the result if the project. In its management an iterative approach can be used when the goal of the project is ensuring that the end user gets the optimum care and attention as well as benefits from the project, which is where feedback is important as this helps with mitigating the possible risks and its management. Changing course is also done within scope and budget with resource levelling.
Using the linear cycle would enable the MTD to be
Flexible; as much as they may have a Linear lifecycle, embracing change especially with the times would not only help them be creative but also help them with competitors
Incorporate iterative approach- they would do better in the identification and swift mitigation of risks and having
Feedback- with sprints created – tasks broken into smaller projects, feedback will be gotten more frequently and the right course plotted with regular team
As a project manager who is working in collaboration with the MTD,which is an event planning company I have learned over time to during my period of study in project management with DEXA,I have learned that Linear lifecycle have a start middle and end .
It starts with the development of an idea and an assessment if the idea is viable which is known as the CONCEPT
It proceeds into the detailed description of the project and it’s plans which is also known as the DEFINITION PROCESS.
The Linear
It also implements the plan and carries out a testing process to ensure that the project is well functional.this is also known as the DEPLOYMENT PROCESS.
Finally the project is handed over to the sponsors and the user this phase is known as the TRANSITION PROCESS.
The linear approaches woks more in a stable environment as compared to the ITERATIVE APPROACH.
Typically ITERATIVE PROJECTS
do not begin with detailed specifications, project plans and schedules
However as an event planner some of my features will be
1.managing the event planning processes
2.managing budgets and parameters
3.transporting good’s and lodging of guests
4.determining the venue of the event.
5.communicating and network development.
6.supervise event setups
7.select event speakers
8.interpersonal skills
The advantages of working ITERATIVELY is all of the aforementioned tasks are done one after the other over a longer period of time as compared to LINEAR APPROACHES which will carry out all of these tasks at once over a shorter period of time.
ITERATIVE APPROACH allows me to benefit from my stakeholders feedback and also to get early return on investment while retaining the ability to adapt and change course as the event progresses.
AGILE is not a methodology or a framework but a mindset that enables the organization or project managers to be more responsive to changes.
Therefore I would say that they both work holistically.
Blessing Oku
Cohort 17
Project management
As a project manager working with MTD, the events company, I’ve learned that an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project could bring several benefits:
1. *Flexibility*: Embracing change and adapting to evolving event requirements.
2. *Risk reduction*: Identifying and mitigating potential issues through continuous iteration.
3. *Improved stakeholder satisfaction*: Collaborative approach ensures stakeholder needs are met.
4. *Enhanced team collaboration*: Encourages open communication and collective problem-solving.
An agile approach would imply:
1. *Iterative planning*: Breaking down the project into smaller, manageable chunks.
2. *Continuous improvement*: Embracing lessons learned and applying them to future iterations.
3. *Customer-centricity*: Prioritizing stakeholder needs and expectations.
4. *Adaptive leadership*: Empowering team members to take ownership and make decisions.
My advice to MTD would be:
1. *Embrace flexibility*: Be open to change and willing to adjust plans accordingly.
2. *Foster collaboration*: Encourage stakeholder involvement and team communication.
3. *Prioritize iteration*: Break down projects into smaller, manageable tasks.
4. *Continuously improve*: Reflect on lessons learned and apply them to future projects.
By adopting an iterative and agile approach, MTD can enhance their event management capabilities, improve stakeholder satisfaction, and stay competitive in the industry.
As a project manager collaboration with MTD, events planning shouldn’t be considered as linear because the end user would always provide feedback and this would be useful in making the necessity adjustments, hence, the need for using an iterative approach.
I have learnt that most projects follow the linear cycle- beginning, implementation and then the end- transition phase which is seen in most developmental projects. However, through DEXA, and in the NGO space, I’ve come to understand that a project can have a Linear lifecycle however, in its management an iterative approach can be used when the goal of the project is ensuring that the end user gets the optimum care and attention as well as benefits from the project. This feedback helps with mitigating the possible risks and its management. Changing course is also done within scope and budget with resource levelling.
My advice to MTD would for them to be
1. Flexible; as much as they may have a Linear lifecycle, embracing change especially with the times would not only help them be creative but also help them with competitors
2. Incorporate iterative approach- they would do better in the identification and swift mitigation of risks
3. Feedback- with sprints created – tasks broken into smaller projects, feedback will be gotten more frequently and the right course plotted with regular team communication to ensure that they remain on course and the values of the organisation not breached.
Some of the things I’ve learnt that could help ameliorate the challenges faced by MTD includes the different methods or approaches of handling a project (it could be the linear approach, iterative approach or the combination of the two depending on the complexity of the projects), application of ethical decision making to project management.
There are different implications of taking an iterative approach to setting up an event, it could be positive or negative. Some of the positive implications includes: it encourages flexibility, the team can make changes in the scope of events; it also encourages team collaboration and one of the negative implications is that higher cost might be incurred due to changes in scope or experimentation.
Some of the implications of agile approach includes increased customer satisfaction, the delivery of each product meets the needs of the customer.
There is transparency among the stakeholders because everyone will see the progress of the project at any given time.
There are so many approaches to accomplishing a task as a project manager, so my advice would be to adopt an approach that encourages flexibility, collaboration among the stakeholders so as to tackle any potential challenges that may arise in the project.
No matter the situation the project manager should always remember to apply the ethical principles and communicate effectively.
As a project manager working with MTD, some of the skills i would make implement is communication as well as teamwork. communicating with the necessary stakeholders is key as that could make or mar the outcome of the project.
One of the implications of taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project manager would have to do with ethics because there’s a sprint set up to meet different goal at the same time, team members may jeopardize the company’s ethics over the outcome of the project.
If i were to advice the company, it would be for them to make use of the hybrid approach and not stick to either linear or iterative approach of executing a project as this would help detect unforeseen risks and mitigate them without exceeding the budget.
Obongha, Bassey Ofem
Team 7
As a project manager with MTD, I have learnt that communication with team members is very important as well as with Colleagues, Sponsors and Stakeholders.
I will advise the company to go for iteration approach because:
1. Feedback will be received from the customers thereby seeing the impact.
2. Attention will be given to the customers by the team
Adopting Agile methodologies
1. All team members feel engaged in the process
2. Transparency when it comes to information
3. Team members, Sponsors and Stakeholders participate in decision making.
As a Project Manager at MTD, I would apply the insight of the Hybrid Approach. They can start off with the Linear Approach and end with the Iterative Approach, thereby applying both methods hence ending up with the Hybrid Approach to get the desired outcome.
If an iterative approach were employed in organizing an event as a project,
1. The team will get feedback from their customers, thereby seeing the impact it has on their customers.
2. Customers will get attention from the team, thereby engaging the in process.
Implications of adopting an agile approach are:
1. The teams feel engaged in the process
2. There is information transparency
3. Everyone gets to participate in decision- making.
NDIDI IFEDIBA NWOKEDI
Okolo Nancy: Team 8
As a project manager working with MTD, I would advise the company adopt both the iterative and agile approach thereby helping to accomplish simple, complex and complicated tasks in the course of the events.
I will recommend having the team and stakeholders meet and deliberate on how best to get the project done, and I will ensure there is effective communication while changing the approach of operation under proper monitoring.
As a project manager collaborating with MTD, I’ve gained insights into the challenges they face in event planning, such as:
-Unpredictable timelines and deadlines
-Changing client requirements and expectations
-Managing risks and unexpected issues
Applying an iterative approach in organizing an event as a project could lead to increased flexibility and adaptability to changing requirements and improved risk management through incremental testing and feedback
Employing an agile approach would mean :embracing change and uncertainty as opportunities for improvement,focusing on delivering incremental value to clients and stakeholders and also encouraging active stakeholder participation and feedback.
If MTD sought my advice I would recommend
1. Providing training and support for team members to develop agile skills and mindsets
2.Fostering a culture of collaboration, creativity, and continuous improvement
3.Establishing clear communication channels and stakeholder engagement strategies
4. Implementing agile methodologies (e.g., Scrum, Kanban) to enhance flexibility and responsiveness
One of the difficulties that could be encountered in MTD is inadequate supply of water for an event. The way I would solve that as a project manager would be to communicate. I have learnt so far,that a project manager does not mean you dont accept help from your team members,in fact it means the very opposite. As a project manager in this situation, I would communicate to my team members and see how I can fix ths issue before the event begins,if we can’t on our own then I’ll involve sponsors or stakeholders,so they’re in on what is happening and offer hell where they can. There’s always a solution to every problem,so don’t be an island of yourself.
Iterative approach requires the ability to be quick to change, spontaneous e.t.c.unlike in linear where if the event does not follow a particular plan,then it most times fails. An iterative method is one of the best things to happen to any project.
Agile method implications:
1. Satisfied customers
2. Reduced expenses.
P.S: note that linear and iteration must not be in a competition. A project may kick start by using linear method and then change to iteration method.
Pamela Ogechi Anibuko
Cohort 17, team 2
– As a project manager with MTD, I’ll first of all gather enough information about the former and present project, study the information which will help me in handling the present project, then make sure there’s proper communication between all stakeholders involved in the project.
– This iterative approach to event planning will break down the process into smaller and more manageable phases, thereby making the progress of the project more visible and faster.
– Agile, with its emphasis on flexibility and rapid response to change, goes very well with the dynamic nature of event planning. Flexibility will help manage both the project management team and all stakeholders involved
First thing is to do a deep research about the company and the previous projects they had then analyse it and then follow up with communication to the stakeholders first then the team members and mtd letting them know the process then assign tasks to team members according to their strengths and areas of preferences and expertise
Poor communication was the main challenge the team had to deal with. Also, from the start, the major stakeholders were not properly engaged.
Inorder to ensure that the team spirit was restored, Karen was able to understand the members of the team which made it easy for to know the right approach to be used in fostering proper communication amongst them.
The skills identified are; problem solving skills, proper research and communication at the end.
As an MTD project manager, the first step I will take is to gather information’s on their previous projects or events, study them and understand the methods and approaches they used the challenges they encountered and the result of the event or project then proceed to communicate with the stakeholders and sponsor to know what exactly they want or they want it and what they are expecting as the outcome of the event,these would help to know the kind of method or approach to deploy.
My advice would be to use an approach that’s flexible and encourages feedbacks and improvement. An approach that would limit risks and give room for recreation or corrections before escalation. Method or approach that encourages team work and and support such that team members will not be burnout .
Since there’s no one perfect approach to projects, flexibility will make it easy to change course when faced with challenges that is beyond what the initial method or approach can handle and implore or inclOther method or approach by so doing thee will be a successful events.
It has been quite an eye-opening week, really going into the details of project management, particularly event planning. From working with the events firm MTD, it has reeled off a few issues common to them, such as addressing last-minute changes, meeting the varying expectations of different stakeholders, and coordinating efficiently various teams within their areas. Based on my experience, there is a great case for an iterative and agile setup in managing an event.
Iterative Approach Implications:
This iterative approach to event planning will break down the process into smaller, more manageable phases. For instance, it would start with the initial brainstorming phases, which would undergo successive rounds of feedback and refinement to arrive at a choice. Through this, MTD will be able to experiment with different ideas and concepts and narrow them down progressively to the best possible outcomes. Among the many benefits it can bring into a project, Early Identification and Solution of Problems ranks high. This methodology allows one to realize and solve problems at an early stage instead of their incidental revelation at a later stage, which is possibly more expensive. Besides, this approach supports a culture of continuous improvement, with each iteration building on the one that preceded it.
Implications of Agile Approach:
Agile, with its emphasis on flexibility and rapid response to change, goes very well with the dynamic nature of event planning. Agile, under this scenario of MTD, would incorporate cross-functional teams working in short sprints, producing incremental values, and reviewing priorities frequently. This helps attend to the unpredictable nature of things concerning the events, like vendor availability or changes in the client requirement. The need to maintain a flexible schedule and the issues associated with priorities are those problems that could be best handled by MTD. It will easily adopt any change that may come as a surprise without sacrificing the quality of the event at large.
My Possible Advise to MTD:
If I were to advise MTD, I would tell them to use both iterative and agile approaches in a hybrid way. First, an iterative process at the beginning of the planning phase would not only yield scope for creative ideas but also define the basic components of the event. As the date of the event draws closer and concrete decisions become necessary, shift to an agile framework to maintain responsiveness to last-minute changes and efficient execution.
In addition to this, instilling a culture of open communication and collaboration is important. Regular check-ins with the team and stakeholders will ensure that everybody is on the same page, whereas at the same time, any probable issues will be curbed before things get worse. This technology adopted for project management and communication can be further integrated to bring ease of operations and coordination.
In other words, iterative and agile approaches are two paradigms that may be coupled to give flexibility and structure to MTD, ensuring that no event becomes too intricate. This duality of approach will avoid risks and maximize opportunities for delivering memorable and well-run events.
As a Project manager collaborating with MTD Event company , I will apply the main phases of Project management by first going through the initiation and planning process by organizing all information available on projects at hand, having a meeting with the stakeholder/client , Define the project goals, find out the resources available which include vendors, equipment, location and more
I will then create a budget, select schedules, establish my team and then determine roles and responsibilities by having a meeting with my team
Subsequently using agile methodology which allows task to be completed in iteration and also allow for feedback in between the project and also be able to mitigate possible risk
Gbemisola Atunda-olu Cohort 17 Team 5
As a project manager for MTD, I would go with the iterative method because it gives opportunities for regular feedback and time to fix up any mistake being made
Aishat Aiteseme Abdulrazaaq
Cohort 17
Team 1
As a project manager working with MTD, I’d consider the implications of iterative and Agile approaches to setting up an event. My advice to MTD is to start by introducing iterative development principles to specific event projects, focusing on incremental progress and continous improvement. Then gradually adopt Agile methodologies, such as Scrum to enhance collaboration and adaptability. Develop a hybrid approach blending traditional event planning with Agile principles to suit MTD’s unique needs. As a project manager, i will provide trainings and coaching to ensure teams understand and embrace the new approaches. I will establish clear goals, metrics and feedback mechanisms to monitor progress and adapt strategies as needed. I will also emphasize communication, transparency, and stakeholder engagement throughout the process.
As a project manager, I’ve realized that no project is free of challenges. For the MTD event project, applying both iterative and agile approaches will be beneficial. By sourcing the right experts and delivering the project in sprints, we can achieve the best results in the shortest time possible.
I’ve learnt that each project presents its own unique challenges and as a project manager, the ability to come up with solutions to these problems in a collaborative manner while not losing sight of the goal and your team is key.
The implications of employing an iterative approach are: it is timely, cost effective, improves usability, aids in managing risks as well as it offers continual improvements.
The implications of employing an agile approach are: It reduces waste by minimizing resources, rapid deployment of solutions, increases focus on specific needs of the customers aswell as increases frequency of collaboration and feedback.
if my advice was sought, i would recommend the use of agile methodology in delivering projects, because the company seeks to leave a lasting impact on the environment and the best approach to employ is one that provides the avenue to do that.
getting the intended results and makin
As a project manager in MTD, the ma. if any problem is encountered in the process of doing this, first we have to consider what is causing the problem before deciding on which method will be used in solving it.
If the iterative method is used, it will help determine the outcome of the method during the testing method before applying it.
As a Project manager at MTD, the first thing to do will be to have a meeting with the staff members involved in the project, identify the problems the company is facing and proffer solutions using different methodologies -which are a combination of both the linear and iterative methods. I will combine these methods because of the unpredictable and various challenges that may surface during the project. With these methods, different set of tools and techniques will be used to solve the problems at MTD.
If I decide to use the iterative methodology for this project, the process will be faster because most of the work will be done all at once in a shorter period of time which is between 2 to 4 weeks duration. In this period, we will engage in planning meeting, two week sprint, mini review and sprint again.
The consequences of adopting the agile method is that risks can be managed, making it less riskier. Also, there will be more customer interaction, making it a win, win for both those working on the projects and the customers. There will be a better team work experience because the team members will be involved in the decision making process.
Okiemute Iko-ojo Ojogbane
Cohort 17, Team 8
Applying what I have learnt.
As a Project Manager for MTD, having a vast understanding of the various complex situations under which the organization had dispensed its services in the past would be a veritable source of knowledge pool from which other future engagements with clients would be based.
From last week’s study, I have learnt that most projects do not present easy circumstances for the application of a linear approach.
In a linear method of project management, it is assumed that there is the availability of good information and the understanding of the project goal, it’s solution as well as the outcome from onset in addition to the fact that the scope of the project won’t change significantly.
Giving this situation and the obvious opposing circumstances faced by MTD, it is clear that MTD is always faced with dynamic challenges and uncertainties that negate the application of only a linear approach. For example, how to quickly handle unexpected change or surge in the number of expected users different from the initially presented figure on which budget and planning had been based upon before deployment to site.
For this reason, I would engage a hybrid approach that utilize both the linear and the iterative methods to managing the different aspects of project surprises.
Taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project would allow for better interaction and feedback from the client. This frequent information flow would help project team focus on the immediate and important needs of the client thus facilitating better understanding of the entire project objective in bits form to allow for more deliverables within the shortest time possible. These are parts of the implications for an agile approach.
Notably, an agile approach allows for frequent refinement of user requirements, accelerated delivery of projects output, promotes visibility and sense of responsibility towards meeting client’s event needs as well as assuring project sponsors of accountability.
My honest advice to the company would be to always deploy the use of hybrid method to ensure flexibility in dealing with different clients. This would help to address the unique complexity, volatility, uncertainty and ambiguity different event projects may present.
Emmanuel Olusegun Omotere
Team 4
Cohort 17
Insights I have gained that would assist MTD in addressing their challenges are, knowledge of who are key stakeholders, being alert on potential risks and possible solutions, as a project manager, changes are inevitable hence preparedness for unexpected last minute requests is a must. Also attention to detail ensures client satisfaction and error management
Employing iterative approach reduces risks as there is earlier problem detection, there is room to make changes as the project is ongoing,, quality of the final product is refined and above all, learning and improvement are at the core which improves the experience of the whole project.
However, time is consumed and it delays the project. It may require additional resources outside of the budget which also disadvantages the client. A balance is needed between the approach and project constraints.
:Each approach has its cons the hence creating ahybrid ‘is applauded
As a project manager, looking at the difficulties faced by MTD in the course of the project. Iteration is the best approach to use as to get the project done. Because this approach gives room for flexibility, continuous improvement and managing risk. It embraces flexibility, breaks down the task into sprints there by getting the intended results and making possible amendments at the same time getting the project to completion at the targeted time.
Oguche Emmanuel Achogba
Cohort 17 Team 7
As a project manager in MTD, the major work of the company is distributing water to the various sector in the community. if any problem is encountered in the process of doing this, first we have to consider what is causing the problem before deciding on which method will be used in solving it. This week i’ve learnt the way the method works.
If the iterative method is used, i think it will make the project easily resolved. This method will help determine the outcome of the method during the testing method before applying it originally.
Now taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project manager allows for flexibility, continuous improvement, and risk reduction. Also an agile approach adds rapid planning and execution, collaboration, and customer-centricity. My advice is to:
– Embrace flexibility
– Break down tasks into sprints
– Prioritize tasks
– Establish a cross-functional team
– Use iterative cycles
– Encourage feedback and improvement
– Focus on delivering value to attendees
– Adapt to unexpected challenges
This approach ensures a successful project delivery that meets evolving requirements and delivers value to the clients and customers.
If I were the project manager of MTD, I would advice that we organize meetings with the stakeholders of the community. We have to know how the project is affecting them and what we can do to make it better (if the feedback is negative). So, I feel that the agile and/or iterative approach would be beneficial.
If I were the project manager of MTD, I would advice that we organize meetings with the stakeholders of the community. We have to know how the project is affecting them and what we can do to make it better (if the feedback is negative). So, I feel that the agile and/or iterative approach would be beneficial.
I learned that as a project manager, there’s is no challenges free project. So in the case of MTD event project, the application of both iterative and agile approach to the project will good achievement because sourcing for right experts and delivering the project in sprints will produced the best result in a shortest time possible.
I intend to work on my communication and negotiation skills. I’ve always had difficulty in conveying ideas or messages to people, Also while negotiating, i tend to bring in sentiments. I believe at the end of this course, I’d have greatly improved.
As a Project Manager, looking at the difficulties MTD face, because to an extent they have to depend on resource and conditions in the hosting country and the size of the project, it means they operate in complex and ambiguous environments.
If Iteration is employed it will mean delivering a particular goal in each sprint and evaluating and getting feedback, that is using sprints to deliver each stage of the waterfall. For example, sprint can be used in definition of the project then getting the customer approval before moving to deployment stage. This will speed up the delivery of each stage and ensure teams are motivated to give their best.
The agile approach is well suited for MTD projects.
Odinfe david Chika
Team7
cohort16
My name Adewale Mathew
Team 1 cohort 16
ateemah1
July 5, 2024 at 12:31 pm
As a project manager in MTD, l no can see that MTD faced challenges of complex and ambiguous environment.
To eradicate this issues, l have learnt to maintain an effective communication within my team, engage customers or users for feedback, discover risk and monitor the risk early enough and take early action, collaborative effort is also important for speedy delivery of project and still achieve desired outcome.
From what I’ve learned, I can see that applying both the linear and Iterative method can help the MTD event company in planning and organizing their projects.
They can have a linear plan to help them see how the whole project would ultimately run from start to the completion. However applying the Iterative method in some aspect during the course of the project would enable them work progressively, completing different aspects within a short time. This would also give room for feedbacks and evaluation.
Adopting an Agile approach to event planning is very ideal because there are usually different things to be put in place that would together contribute to the smooth running of things in the event. For this the productivity of agile teams would be highly needed. Also finishing short tasks on time and reprioritizing would ensure that tasks as completed and project is progressive
From what I’ve learnt so far, the VUCA framework can first be used to address the issue going on within the organization. Then an agile or Iterative approach should be adopted
Consequences of Agile approach are;
It is flexible, changes can easily be made
It encourages user feedbacks, which enabmes one to understand if what you are doing is truly solving the customers problems, here one can easily work on those ferdbacks thereby improving the work and ensuring it meets up to the customers demands
A large and cumbersome project can be easily splitted into mini projects called “Sprints “
Edeh Chibueze Goodluck.
Team 3 Cohort 16.
As a PM for MTD, I have come to realise that I don’t have total control over project conditions. Despite that, I have to ensure that the conditions I can control are well managed.
When using an iterative approach to organize an event, I have to realise that the project might run into a scope creep due to it being feedback dependent and the project might not be delivered in its complete form due to various mini projects going on consecutively. I also have to bear in mind that the project might be unpredictable.
Adopting an agile approach to organising the event will imply running into situations where I can’t make sense of interconnected parts, task executors and processes. There is also the situation of acting on guesswork, volatility of price of materials for setting up the event and not knowing the impact of some decisions on the course of the event.
For such a situation, I would recommend a hybrid approach which will help in testing out ideas and the requirements that will be gathered from feedback. It will also enhance stakeholder engagements will providing them assurance. It will also increase accountability, transparency and visibility. This will reduce acting on guesswork and ensure clear task management and timely delivery.
My name Fatimah Oluwatoyin. As a project manager in MTD, l noticed that MTD faced challenges of complex and ambiguous environment.
To tackle this issues, l have learnt to maintain an effective communication within my team, engage customers or users for feedback, discover risk and monitor the risk early enough and take early action, collaborative effort is also important for speedy delivery of project and still achieve desired outcome.
The implication of iterative approach – This approach does not begin with detailed specification, project plan, schedules. It start with an idea by testing these ideas and get feedback from users or client. The feedback determines the viability of the project before carrying it out.
My advice to MTD – The combination of the two approaches would be advantageous for MTD projects in order to;
Test ideas and learn about customers or users.
Improve stakeholder engagement
Provide assurance to sponsors and stakeholders.
Increase accountability
As a project manager, I’ve gained valuable insights from this module! My insight is that I should ensure seamless coordination and flow of communication amongst stakeholders, so much that clients can see tangible progress early on, which will help in refining expectations and requirements. Here’s how I plan to implement this:
“I will ensure seamless coordination and flow of communication amongst stakeholders…”
– I will proactively communicate with team members, clients, sponsors, and vendors to avoid bottlenecks and miscommunications.
– I will establish a systematic communication process to keep all stakeholders informed and aligned.
“…so much that clients can see tangible progress early on…”
– I will provide regular updates, progress reports, and showcase deliverables to demonstrate concrete achievements and milestones from the outset.
– I will involve clients in the progress and milestones to foster trust and confidence in the project’s trajectory.
“…which will help in refining expectations and requirements.”
– I will collaborate with clients to refine their expectations and requirements as needed, ensuring that project deliverables align with their evolving needs.
– I will adjust the project plan and communication strategy accordingly to meet client needs and deliver value to all stakeholders.
By implementing these strategies, I aim to ensure a harmonious and successful project journey in MTD, meeting client needs and delivering value to all stakeholders. Aww
Poor communication and lack of collaboration affected the MTD project, I was in charge I would have employed both linear and iterative methods because we would have been able to test ideas, improve stakeholders’ engagement , provide assurance to sponsors
Poor communication can lead to significant project management problems. Project managers must provide direction at every step of the project, so each team member knows what’s expected. Effective communication to everyone involved in the project is crucial to its successful completion. Through project management training, team members can improve their communication skills.
A disinterested team member, client, CEO or vendor can destroy a project. A skilled project manager communicates openly and encourages feedback at every step to create greater engagement among participants.
Agile project management is an iterative approach to managing software development projects that focuses on continuous releases and incorporating customer feedback with every iteration.
Building products our customers can use, to makes them happy. Being able to frequent add new features based on their feedback makes them happy too. As a software customer, I’m not sure there is anything worse than investing in a product that doesn’t work, doesn’t do what we need it to do, and not being unable to see any path forward for making it better. I’m willing to buy a first iteration product if I know it is going to do nothing but get better over time. As a matter of fact, it can be fun seeing the product emerge as the development team gets more feedback. Agile helps us build this kind of partnership with our customers, one where we are working together to get problems solved.
With the insights gathered, MTD can be able to solve their problem by using both Linear and Iterative approach. With the initial engagement with all stakeholders before the project starts,there should also be regular interactions with them so as to obtain valuable feedback and make necessary adjustments to suit their needs.
The consequences of having an iterative approach are;
Customer engagement and satisfaction
Team collaboration and inclusiveness
Risk mitigation
Detailed understanding of the expectation of the client
Cumbersome projects are broken down into sprint of mini projects
The implications of adopting an agile approach;
The volatility that may occur during the project are fully taken care of
Encourages team collaboration
Transparency between stakeholders
The right project solution is gotten through feedback from stakeholders
When asked for advice, i will recommend Incorporating a hybrid approach for handling any projects. While having a structured plan for the project ,regular engagement with client and stakeholders will help in providing the best project desired by the stakeholders with lesser risk
As a project manager having gained the knowledge I did from this module, the insight I can offer is that there should be Ensured, seamless coordination and flow of communication amongst stakeholders so much that Clients can see tangible progress early on, which will help in refining expectations and requirements.
The consequences of employing an iterative approach would be:
1) Continuous improvement enabling the teams to refine processes and deliver higher quality events over time.
2) Increased client engagement and regular interactions which allows clients to provide continuous feedback, ensuring alignments with expectations.
On that note, when sought for advice, I’d recommend
1) Using robust communication tools to facilitate real-time collaboration among teams and stakeholders.
2) Breaking down events into iterations, ensuring each phase delivers measurable value.
3) Emphasize learning from each event to refine processes, improve efficiency, and enhance overall event quality.
By integrating these insights and recommendations, MTD can navigate the complexities of event planning more effectively, ensuring successful and memorable events for their clients.
Ndudi Anastecia Nwagwe
Cohort 16 team 7
Considering the challenges in MTD projects, an iterative/agile approach is recommended, based on:
– Event complexity
– Stakeholder engagement needs
– Resource availability
Benefits of iterative approach:
– Continuous improvement and feedback loops
– Adaptability to changes and unforeseen issues
– Early risk identification and mitigation
– Enhanced stakeholder engagement and satisfaction
– Efficient resource allocation
However, adopting an agile approach also implies:
– Detailed initial planning with flexibility
– Strong communication and collaboration skills
– High customer/stakeholder involvement
– Effective iteration management to avoid scope creep and budget overruns
Considering the challenges in MTD projects, an iterative/agile approach is recommended, based on:
– Event complexity
– Stakeholder engagement needs
– Resource availability
Benefits of iterative approach:
– Continuous improvement and feedback loops
– Adaptability to changes and unforeseen issues
– Early risk identification and mitigation
– Enhanced stakeholder engagement and satisfaction
– Efficient resource allocation
However, adopting an agile approach also implies:
– Detailed initial planning with flexibility
– Strong communication and collaboration skills
– High customer/stakeholder involvement
– Effective iteration management to avoid scope creep and budget overruns
On the journey of this training so far my knowledge has been built on the possible ways to manage difficulty as a project manager.
Considering the difficulties and problems that MTD encounters in their projects, I have gain insight of applying iterative and linear approaches in project management because combination of the two will make the project easier and faster.
In other hand, If they would have applied iterative approach or agile approach the project would have taking much time to complete because this involves breaking the project into phases and emphasizes continuous collaboration and improvement. Here teams follow a cycle of planning, executing, and evaluating the project.
Stephen Izuchukwu Emeasoba
Cohort 16, Team 9.
Considering the difficulties and problems that MTD encounters in their projects, employing an iterative or agile approach will be based on these key factors, Event’s complexity, Stakeholder engagement needs, and Resource availability.
Consequences of Iterative Approach
1. Continuous improvements and refinements allow for regular feedback loops. Based on feedbacks, iteration provides an opportunity to learn and make adjustments.
2. Throughout the planning process it allows for adjustments and changes to be made, respond to unforeseen issues and changes in requirements more effectively.
3. Potential risks can be identified and addressed early, by breaking down the project into smaller iterations. Adjustments can be made iteratively to reduce the impact of unforeseen issues.
4. Improve engagement and satisfaction of stakeholders via frequent interactions. Ensuring their expectations are met and they can provide input at various stages.
5. Based on the needs of each iteration, resources can be allocated and reallocated to help in planning and managing resources more efficiently.
Implications of adopting an agile approach
1. Planning for each iteration requires a detailed initial broad plan with flexibility and if not carefully managed, can lead to challenges in maintaining scope and budget.
2. Requires strong communication skills and a collaborative team environment. Teams must be empowered to make decisions and be self-organizing.
3. Necessary high involvement of customers and stakeholders, which can be demanding. But needed to established continuous engagement and feedback mechanisms.
4. If iterations are not effectively managed, the risk of scope creep and budget overruns becomes eminent. So to ensure the project remains on track, strong time and budget management is required.
Based on the event’s complexity, stakeholder engagement needs, and resource availability. I will recommend the combination of the two approach.
From my own view, as a project manager with MTD, you should adopt linear and iteration approach when working on any project. The combination of the two approach helps in delivering a project on time, with right amount of finance and also helps in carrying everyone on the project along.
Egesi Oluchi Winifred,Team 4.
From what i have learnt,as a project manager with MTD, having known the challenges,i will adopt both the linear and iterative approach, to get the project delivered
As a project Manager with MTD, linear and iterative approach should be adapted because using one approach for different project is risk because of uncertainty
from my own view, MTD should aodpt both linear and iterative approach for an effective execution of projects because the combination of both approaches accelarate project delivery ,facilitate idea testing,increases accountability and transperancy,effective feedbacks and engagement with sponsors and stakeholders
Kingsley okpoko, team 7, cohort 16.
As a project manager with MTD, and considering the difficulties and problems MTD projects faces, the project will have to be separated in phases, whereby reviews will be heard and also speed to complete the project I time. This is after the project have being considered.
Blessing Olusakin Team3 Cohort16
If I was the Project Manager for MTD events, what I have learnt this week that could help is to acknowledging these potential challenges and proactively develop strategies to mitigate risks and ensure the success of the project.
Taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project implies:
1. Breaking down the project into smaller, manageable bites known as iterations
2. Focusing on one iteration at a time
3. Continuously reviewing and refining the project plan
4. Adapting to changes and new requirements as they arise
It’s implications are
1. Increased flexibility and adaptability
2. Faster response to changes and issues
3. Improved risk management
4. Enhanced team collaboration and communication
5. Resources are efficiently and effectively used ; minimal wastage or none at all.
So taking up an Agile approach means they are going to
1. Embrace the Agile methodology
2. Prioritize flexibility and rapid delivery
3. Deliver small, incremental pieces of the project as in sprints
4. Continuously improve and learn
This aids
– Faster time-to-market
– Higher team morale and engagement
– Improved adaptability to change
– Enhanced customer satisfaction
– More focused on delivering value to stakeholders
My advice to the company will be for them to
1.Embrace an iterative and agile approach to manage the event project.
2. Break down the project into smaller tasks and prioritize them based on importance and urgency.
3. Establish a cross-functional team with clear roles and responsibilities.
4. Set up regular meetings and feedback loops to ensure continuous improvement.
5. Focus on delivering value to stakeholders and adapt to changes as needed.
6. Monitor progress and adjust the approach as necessary.
7. Prioritize communication, collaboration, and teamwork.
8. Be flexible and open to new ideas and approaches.
This week, I learned that clear communication, flexibility, and stakeholder engagement are crucial for successful project management. Taking an iterative approach in setting up events allows for continuous improvement and adaptability, addressing issues promptly and refining processes. An agile approach emphasizes collaboration, responsiveness, and incremental progress, ensuring that the event meets client needs and expectations. My advice to MTD would be to adopt these methods, focusing on regular feedback, open communication, and adaptability to enhance project outcomes and client satisfaction while efficiently managing resources and timelines.
Concerning the challenges faced by MTD, I believe a blend of iterative and linear approaches will work.
The linear approach will set a clear model for how the project should run from beginning to end (sourcing the water and disinfecting it to delivery) as well as how to run the event. This helps all the stakeholders to know the plan from the beginning.
Despite the plan though, challenges could come up especially based on feedback from users. In attending to the complaints, an iterative approach will come in handy so that the team can zero in to fix the specific challenges and get feedback quickly.
This way, they are able to fix the challenges and move back to plan.
HI, Ogundimu Kezia, Team 7
The iterative approach in project management acknowledges the inevitability of change, as it starts without detailed specifications and rigid project plans. This necessitates adjustments that the project manager and team must swiftly address through ongoing, adaptable planning.
In contrast, adopting an agile approach allows teams to quickly reprioritize and change direction. By working in short, focused sprints and limiting concurrent tasks, agile teams increase productivity and responsiveness. Tasks are prioritized based on their value to users and the business.
I recommend combining both linear and iterative approaches because it facilitates idea testing and understanding of user requirements, accelerates project delivery, enhances stakeholder engagement, improves accountability, boosts visibility and transparency, and provides reassurance to sponsors and stakeholders.”
Challenges Faced by MTD
1. Water Supply: Reliance on tanker drivers to deliver water, with potential delays due to tanker faults or accidents, could halt the event.
2. Buffer Bag Size: The size of buffer bags for clean and wastewater must be proportionate to the number of attendees. Changes or extraction during the event could disrupt the water system.
3. Water Disinfection: The required 2-hour disinfection period and sending samples to the laboratory before usage create significant downtime.
4. Water Quality: Ensuring water quality through laboratory testing before usage.
Approach to Solutions
Using a combination of linear and iterative approaches, the planning stage can address potential issues, while iterative processes can ensure continuous improvement and adaptability during the event.
Planning Stage Questions
1. Water Supply:
– What if there is a delay in water delivery on the event day due to a faulty tanker or an accident?
– How will the system cope if the water in the buffer bag or from the existing tanker is exhausted?
2. Buffer Bag Size:
– What is the appropriate size of the buffer bag for clean water and wastewater relative to the number of attendees?
– How will changing the wastewater in the buffer bag or extracting wastewater impact the event?
3. Water Disinfection:
– How can the 2-hour disinfection period and water sample testing be managed to minimize downtime?
Solutions for the Challenges
Water Supply
– Advance Planning: Collect guest numbers from the client a week before the event to determine the required tank and buffer sizes.
– Backup Measures: Arrange a standby water tanker and trained personnel to refill the buffer. This ensures continuity in case of tanker failure.
Iterative Improvements:
– Monitor water usage during the event and adjust plans for future events based on real-time feedback.
Wastewater Buffer Bag
-Recycling System: Implement a system to recycle wastewater for flushing toilets by collecting wastewater from kitchens, bathrooms, and water stations. This conserves clean water for drinking.
Iterative Improvements:
– Continuously monitor and optimize the recycling system based on usage patterns and feedback.
Water Disinfection
– Pre-Event Disinfection: Disinfect water before delivery to the event site and ensure water is tested prior to delivery.
– On-Site Testing: Perform on-site water testing before guest usage to ensure quality without significant downtime.
Iterative Improvements:
– Streamline the disinfection and testing processes based on feedback and results from each event to reduce downtime further.
Conclusion
By combining a linear approach for initial planning and system setup with iterative methods for continuous improvement and adaptability, MTD can effectively address the challenges they face. The linear approach ensures a structured and thorough initial setup, while the iterative approach allows for real-time problem-solving and optimization based on feedback and observations during the event.
Recommendations
1. Thorough Initial Planning: Use a linear approach to establish a solid foundation for water supply, buffer bag sizes, and disinfection protocols.
2. Backup Systems: Ensure contingency plans are in place, including backup water tankers and recycling systems for wastewater.
3. Iterative Feedback Loops: Implement mechanisms for real-time monitoring and feedback to continuously improve and adapt processes during the event.
4. Stakeholder Communication: Maintain clear and continuous communication with stakeholders to ensure their needs and concerns are addressed promptly.
By following these recommendations, MTD can enhance the reliability and efficiency of their event water management system, ensuring successful event execution despite potential challenges.
Okeke Uchenna Ifeyinwa Team 7
Consequences of iterative approach on a project:
Change is inevitable in iterative projects approach and since iterative projects do not begin with detailed specification and project plans, there might be need for adjustments which the project manager and his team will have to resolve within a short period of time through continuous, dynamic planning.
*Implication of adopting an agile approach:
Adopting agile approach allows teams to reprioritise and change direction quickly. Agile teams are able to respond quickly by working in short mini-project sprints and by limiting the amounts of works in progress which makes the teams more productive and faster. In agile approach, tasks are prioritised based on their value to the user and business.
I will recommend both linear and iterative approach because:
– it involves testing ideas and learning user requirements.
– it accelerate delivering of project outputs.
– it improves stakeholder engagements.
– it increase accountability.
– it increase visibility and transparency.
-it provides assurance to sponsors and stakeholders.
ESTHER EZINNE UWOGHIREN
Discussing’s the challenges typically requires a combination of effective project management practices, stakeholder engagement, risk assessment, and adaptive leadership. MTD professionals often leverage methodologies such as Agile, MTD (Management of Technological Development) often faces several challenges and problems in their projects, which can vary depending on the nature of the project and the industry involved. Some common difficulties include:
1. Scope Creep: Projects may expand beyond their original scope due to evolving requirements or stakeholder expectations, leading to delays and increased costs.
2. Resource Allocation: Managing human and financial resources efficiently can be challenging, especially when multiple projects compete for the same resources.
3. Technology Integration: Incorporating new technologies into existing systems or processes can lead to compatibility issues or unexpected technical hurdles.
4. Risk Management: Identifying and mitigating risks early in the project lifecycle is crucial but can be complex, particularly in projects with high uncertainty or innovative technologies.
5. Stakeholder Management: Balancing the needs and expectations of various stakeholders, including clients, end-users, and management, requires effective communication and negotiation skills.
6. Quality Control: Ensuring that deliverables meet quality standards and regulatory requirements throughout the project lifecycle requires rigorous testing and validation processes.
7. Budget Constraints: Projects often face budget limitations that require careful cost management and prioritization of expenditures.
8. Time Constraints: Meeting deadlines and project milestones can be challenging, especially when unexpected delays occur or when project schedules are overly ambitious.
9. Change Management: Implementing changes to project scope, schedule, or resources requires careful planning to minimize disruption and maintain project momentum.
10. Environmental and Ethical Considerations: Depending on the industry, projects may need to address environmental impact assessments, ethical considerations, or regulatory compliance, adding complexity to project planning and execution.
COHORT 16
TEAM 4
Both iterative and agile approaches offer significant benefits for organising events, particularly in their ability to adapt to changes, engage stakeholders, and continuously improve. The choice between them depends on the specific needs and context of the event, as well as the team’s familiarity and comfort with these methodologies. Iterative approaches focus more on refinement through repeated cycles, while agile emphasises flexibility, collaboration, and incremental progress. Adopting either approach can lead to a more dynamic, responsive, and successful event organisation process. However, in the case of MTD, with their lack of communication and collaboration, I will recommend the agile approach as it enhances collaboration within the team.
ODILI IFEOMA ENEBELI Team7 Cohort16
Issues of Professional Conduct
1. Lack of Transparency and Communication:
o John’s Experience: John was surprised to learn that the engagement programme had already been carried out without his knowledge. This indicates a lack of communication and transparency from William’s side about the project status and process.
o Karen’s Concerns: Karen felt that the report was too perfect and suspected that there might be issues with the engagement findings. Her hesitation to voice her concerns openly due to fear of office politics and job security reflects a lack of open communication and transparency within the team.
2. Questionable Research Integrity:
o Karen’s Skepticism: Karen’s instinct that the engagement report might be too good to be true suggests potential issues with the integrity of the research process. The seamless alignment of the findings with the project needs could indicate bias or flawed data collection methods.
Ethical Responsibility in Reporting:
o William’s Approach: William seemed confident that the local opinion research was sufficient and that it aligned with their expectations. However, he did not seem to question the validity or rigor of the research, which could compromise the ethical standards of reporting accurate and unbiased data.
Skills Used to Bring Ethics into Decisions
1. Critical Thinking and Problem Solving:
o Karen’s Analysis: Karen used critical thinking to analyze the engagement report and identify potential issues. She mapped out the risks associated with both accepting the report as it was and challenging its findings.
o John’s Collaboration with Karen: John demonstrated problem-solving skills by collaborating with Karen to assess the situation and consider the potential impact of their decisions on the project and the firm’s reputation.
2. Effective Communication:
o John’s Honest Conversation: John sought Karen’s honest opinion about the report, which opened a constructive dialogue about the issues and potential solutions. This demonstrates the importance of effective communication in addressing ethical concerns.
UWOGHIREN OSAGIE WILLIAMS
As a project manager you were asked to advise the company concerning the challenges and issues in MTD projects using iterative approach and agile approach
As a project manager you must define all the challenges and issues the will occur during the period of the project and the way to handle each of the issues
1. Incremental Improvement 2. Adaptability 3. Risk Management 4. Continuous Learning 5. Efficiency 6. Stakeholder Engagement 7. Flexibility in Solutions 8. Long-term Sustainability
In summary, an iterative approach to setting up challenges and issues in MTD projects promotes adaptability, continuous improvement, risk management, and stakeholder engagement, ultimately leading to more effective project delivery and long-term success.
Implementing an agile approach can bring numerous benefits to MTD such as increased flexibility, quicker response to changes, and improved stakeholder satisfaction. However, it also presents several challenges and issues that need to be managed effectively:
1. Culture Change 2. Resource Management 3. Scope Management 4. Stakeholder Engagement 5. Risk Management 6. Measurement and Metrics 7. Scaling Agile 8. Integration with Existing Processes 9. Training and Skill Development 10. Continuous Improvement
In summary Addressing these challenges requires a combination of effective leadership, clear communication, ongoing training, and a willingness to adapt organizational processes. Despite these challenges, many organizations find that the benefits of agile—such as faster time-to-market, improved product quality, and greater customer satisfaction—outweigh the initial difficulties
COHORT 16
TEAM 10
Challenges the MTD faced
1) Reduced appropriate drinking water.
2) reduced water supply.
In other to address these challenges it is important to take into consideration the hybrid methodology (which involves the linear and agile methodology) which will help to overcome some of the challenges faced in the MTD water project. It is important to put into consideration the VUCA framework when planning a project.
The linear approach is used to structure the MTD water project, to balance the environmental issues that may arise during the management of the MTD project it is important to employ the iterative approach . In an unpredictable environmental crisis such as vandalization, terrorism, community riot etc, it is important to take quick actions in other to reduce the effects of these challenges on the project. It is important not to joke with feedbacks as they will aid to ensure quality projects.
Implications of agile methodology
1) it enables quick response to changes.
2) it enables to build quality projects through continuous feedback and improvement.
My advice to the company:
A) ensure steady monitoring of project
B) steady feedback is important
C) never to compromise on quality.
Well for me, any intended approach has their peculiar implications, it’s left to be sure of the environment one is working on. Let’s take a look at some implications for either method.
1. iterative method could help in breaking down organizational events into smaller, manageable tasks this will foster the flexibility of work and in turn bring about increased output program progress.
2 agile approach Prioritize tasks based on changing requirements and needs. it encourages collaboration and open communication among team members and emphasizes continuous improvement and learning.
my advice to MTD would be:
To start by adopting an iterative approach for a specific event project and transiting gradually. Also they should provide training and coaching for team members. Finally, they should monitor progress always and gather feedback, and adopt the changes as necessary.
From Joseph Ikechukwu Onyeocha:
For MTD, an events company, adopting an iterative or agile approach to setting up events as projects could bring several advantages and considerations:
Iterative Approach:
Implications:
1. Progressive Refinement: Events could be planned in stages, focusing first on broad strokes like venue selection and major vendors, then refining details incrementally.
2. Early Feedback: Each iteration allows for feedback from stakeholders and clients, which can be incorporated into subsequent phases, reducing the risk of major revisions later on.
3. Flexibility: Changes can be accommodated more easily as the project progresses, adapting to evolving client needs or external circumstances.
4. Predictability: Each iteration can provide more accurate estimates and insights into timelines and resource requirements as the event details become clearer.
Advice:
– Encourage a phased approach where initial planning lays out broad goals and subsequent iterations add detail and refinement.
– Emphasize communication and feedback loops to ensure alignment with client expectations and to catch potential issues early.
Agile Approach:
Implications:
1. Adaptive Planning: Agile methodologies like Scrum or Kanban allow for continuous planning, adapting plans based on frequent feedback and changing priorities.
2. Cross-functional Teams: Teams are organized to include various skills (e.g., planners, designers, logistics) needed for each aspect of event setup, promoting collaboration and faster decision-making.
3. Iterative Delivery: Events could be delivered in smaller increments or phases (e.g., planning, setup, execution), enabling earlier delivery of value and validation of assumptions.
4. Continuous Improvement: Retrospectives after each event can capture lessons learned and drive improvements for future events.
My Advice:
– Form cross-functional teams dedicated to specific events, fostering collaboration and collective responsibility for success.
– Implement short, regular planning sessions (e.g., weekly sprints) to adjust plans based on new information or client feedback.
Advice for MTD:
Given the nature of event planning and execution, I would advise MTD to consider adopting an agile approach over a purely iterative one. Agile methodologies provide more flexibility, responsiveness to change, and continuous improvement opportunities, which are critical in the dynamic environment of event management. Here’s a structured recommendation:
1. Pilot Agile on Select Events: Start with a few events to pilot agile methodologies such as Scrum or Kanban. Measure the effectiveness in terms of client satisfaction, efficiency gains, and team morale.
2. Train Teams: Invest in training for project managers and team members on agile principles and practices. Ensure everyone understands their roles and responsibilities within an agile framework.
3. Iterate Based on Feedback: Regularly gather feedback from clients, stakeholders, and team members to refine your approach. Use retrospectives to reflect on what worked well and what could be improved.
4. Monitor Metrics:Establish key performance indicators (KPIs) to track the success of agile adoption, such as time-to-market, client satisfaction scores, and team productivity.
By embracing agility, MTD can enhance their ability to deliver high-quality events that meet client expectations while maintaining adaptability in a competitive market.
Ojomo Ayodele
Cohort 16
Team 7
This week, I’ve acclimatised myself with the “complexity” and the frameworks that help us understand organisations and the world at large.
Approaches and practices that help us to manage situations e.g. volatility, uncertainty, complexity & ambiguity (VUCA).
I also explored different approaches & cycles to managing projects, : linear or waterfall approach, iterative or agile approach. I dived into the advantages & disadvantage of each approach, their uniqueness, similarities, differences. How they can be merged together to enhance speed, productivity and quality of a project or situation.
The implications of taking an iterative approach in setting up an event as a project are?
1. The environment, business or strategy are likely to change, issues that wasn’t planned for might pop up and it’s up to the project manager to determine the complexity of the problem and adapt to it and solve it.
2. The clients or customers are needed frequently to validate and endorse the ideas/steps or plans metered out by the project manager every step of the way and also investment decisions.
3. There is a heightened sense of urgency to deliver project regardless of whether it’s complete or if it’s of standard quality.
4. The solution to a problem is innovative, simply means some problems faced in the field will not have any text book solutions, the project manager and team will have to invent new ways or ideas to tackle such a problem.
5. Most sponsors are very much interested in results, they really dont want to know about the plans, techniques the project manager or team used to achieve their aim. The organisation just wants to see results and good ones.
WHEREAS
The implications of taking the linear approach are?
1. There is unlikeliness of change throughout the entire project, this enables the project manager and team make estimates & plan accurately for the entirety of the project
2. Reliable and accredited research information is available about the project, objectives and expected outcomes.
3. Great value is placed on the assessment of plans, processes and methods employed in executing such projects by the clients, sponsors, stakeholders & organisation
4. Experienced people dedicated in their various fields are available to tackle any problems or issusing arising from the commencement of the project.
My advice to the company would be
1. Flexibility in approaches or methods is highly advised, as different set of problems or issues can arise from the executing of a particular project. Merging of different approaches, the advantages in those approaches would be most preferable that is “The Hybrid Approach” in solving a multitude of problems.
2. Individuals or project members with skill should be employed to facilitate the completion of any given project, it’s a priority that should be taken into consideration.
3. Teamwork is crucial, from the project manager to team members to liaising with the authorities(police, water corporation, tank drivers etc) in the field, every path should be explored with one goal in mind : To Deliver a Complete & Quality Project.
Combining linear and iterative methods can offer a balanced approach to managing the MTD water event project. Every member of the team will have good information and a better understanding of the project goals. The project manager should use the linear method to build a stable and well-understood environment for the team, while using the iterative method to engage with users and stakeholders regularly to gather feedback. Iteration should allow for adjustments and improvements based on this feedback.
Integrating the VUCA framework equips the project team with strategies to handle volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity effectively. As volatility and uncertainty may occur, this structure will help the project manager make better decisions.
Damilola Ogunsakin
Combining linear and iterative methods can offer a balanced approach to managing the MTD water event project. Every member of the team will have good information and a better understanding of the project goals. The project manager should use the linear method to build a stable and well-understood environment for the team, while using the iterative method to engage with users and stakeholders regularly to gather feedback. Iteration should allow for adjustments and improvements based on this feedback.
Integrating the VUCA framework equips the project team with strategies to handle volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity effectively. As volatility and uncertainty may occur, this structure will help the project manager make better decisions.
Combining iterative and Linear approaches will help improve flexibility and speed up delivery of projects outputs. It will also help the team to change plans and directions if need be
There will always be challenges that arise with organizations such as MTD that supply water to events. Issues such as fluctuations in demand may arise, timely delivery, storage and distribution may come with its challenges as well. Water quality and safety or unforeseen circumstances such as equipment failure can disrupt the water supply. If i were a Project Manager for MTD, I would apply VUCA framework approach to address the volatility of demand and unexpected events. Implementation of real time monitoring and data analytics will help to respond to fluctuations. To manage uncertainty in logistics and water quality, this may call for collaboration with event organizers, local authorities and environmental to anticipate and address issues arising.If an iterative approach were employed in organizing an event as a project, things to consider would include,scope creep, that is the project scope may tend to change with each iteration making it challenging to maintain a clear and consistent plan.Adopting an agile approach on the other hand can enable the project team to quickly adapt to changing requirements, Agile also promotes close collaboration among the project team, event organizers and key stakeholders. Given the unique challenges and complexities invloved in organizing events, I would recommend a hybrid approach that combines elements of both traditional project management and agile
Both iterative and agile approaches enable flexibility collaboration and continuous improvements, ensuring a successful and impactful event which involved ability to respond to changing priorities and requirements.
I would advise the company that the implications of iterative or agile projects is that it enables an organization to understand and respond to complexity and ambiguity, and in particular to improve their understanding of what users need and value, through experiments carried out in short iterations. This approach offers several benefits. It allows project managers to divide the overall project into smaller chunks that build upon one another, and start with the issues or components that are most critical to the project. It also increases efficiency, Increases collaboration, Increases adaptability, More cost effective, Ability to work in parallel, Reduced project-level risk and More reliable user feedback.
Linear and agile methods are both important in project management. MTD,s project requires both methods at initial phase and the ongoing stage. In the course of the project they discovered a problem which required reflection and feedback to stakeholders. A new idea was then added to give the project a better output
As a Project Manager collaborating with MTD and considering what I have learned in the course. I have learned to be flexible in certain regards, especially in the methodology to employ. Since there is room for a hybrid approach in managing a project, I believe combining the linear and iterative methods would give more results.
It is good to have detailed plans and ways to execute the plans and it is also good to welcome ideas that can be tested and graded simultaneously. Employing the hybrid approach will give room for flexibility and well-rounded success at the end of the day.
The consequences of employing an iterative approach can be weighed alongside the linear approach. As in the case of the iterative approach, there is room for quick feedback from the user and, a quick test of ideas to know the project’s viability. It helps save time and keep the progress checked and it has a relatively low-cost rescoping chance.
Adapting an agile approach to a project will help contain the VUCA factors. The agile approach alongside the iterative method will produce quick responses from the user and the team, it will also give room for providing solutions to unforeseen circumstances.
My recommendation will be to stay open and flexible, build a team with good communication, and good negotiation ideas, monitor the team’s performance against the progress of the project.
As the project Manager for MTD, I will employ both the Linear and Itiretive approaches.
Benefits of these;
Linear approach
I. The linear approach to a large extent will enable me take each process per time. Preventing resource waste while ensuring feedback as necessary for the next action.
2.Feedback serves as a guide in adopting expertise
. It ensures for instance that each level is handled by a professional who understands that the job doesn’t end on his/ her table.
3. All team members to an extent have a clear knowledge and understanding of the different stages of the project. This fosters team spirit which aids communication in the face of identified challenges.
4. Team members are abreast of developments as the project unfolds, hence can defend it appropriately. It fosters synergy.
Itiretive approach:
1. Gets a wholistic picture of the project by understudying and testing a prototype. For mTD, digital assets would aid in comparing similar projects elsewhere, their challenges and strategies to overcome it.
2. Clients feedback in probably a mini water station will serve as a data base resource. The linear approach can use it as a spring.
3. Digital documentations are relied for information disseminations. Future projects can rely on them as guide.
For the agile approach, as a PM with MTD, the agile method will be useful as a filter. I think through it, priority will be placed on what’s important. Placing side by side strategies that canbe merged to achieve the overall project goal.
Ijeoma Egbu
PM cohort 16
JESUDIMU OPEYEMI,
COHORT 16
TEAM 5
As the project manager representing MTD, we will be using a hybrid approach for this project, combining linear and iterative methods to address the challenges and issues facing the organization.
The linear approach is best for us for the following reasons:
1. The project scope may change due to team challenges in meeting deadlines.
2. We have experienced and skilled individuals available for the project.
The iterative approach is useful for us for the following reasons:
1. Timing and cost cannot be accurately estimated.
2. Adhering to the organization’s culture regarding working hours may be a concern.
Ero Osasenaga Conort 16 Team 4
As a project manager, I would recommend that the company carefully studies d conditions surrounding the project the decide on the most viable approach to use.
However, I would also suggest that a combination of both the linear and iterative approach is welcomed so that this way, a proper solution is reached with all stakeholders in mind.
Nnadi Stella Chidinma
Team 7
As a Project Manager, I would approach the situation based on the stability of the project.
Using linear, Agile or both to met the challenges I am facing.
Using the VUCA framework to access and respond to theses challenges.
Goodness Chidinma Solmon Cohort 16 team 5.
I would recommend they use a hybrid approach that is a combination of both the iterative and linear approach.
I will advise the company to adopt the Agile or iterative project approach as this will give them feedback as they’re working on the project.
Planning an event requires that the owner of the event gets feedback about his events planning so he could know the aspects that needs to be changed and improved upon.
Chiamaka Gloria team 3.
As a project manager I’ve learned how to apply different approaches to difference situations. However adopting the iterative approach can be beneficial because of its flexibility.
It also helps us to identify or detect any risk and managing early.
Project manager needs to combine the iterative and linear method to get a positive and fast result in managing a project.
This is because if the linear approach is appearing like it’s time consuming and not giving the result needed, the project manager can easily switch to iterative approach which will speed up the project.
Victor Adebayo Kolawole, Team 6.
Iterative approach start with idea, hypothesis or vision, it helps to test idea and get the needed feedback from users, iterative helps to deliver output regularly and frequently.
Agile approach is iterative in nature
1. It helps in discovery of risk and taking necessary action.
2. Transparency
3. Speed in decision making.
Iterative approach has twist and turns, and therefore project management must put before them the VUCA framework in perspective. The project team must think on their feet in order to run with the uncertainty that might arise in the course of the project. On the other hand, my advice to the MTD team would include the adoption of a combination of Linear and Iterative approach. This combination will safeguard an adaptive framework, and prevent slowing down of the project delivery time.
Benedict Okafor_ Team 2.
My take in the role of a project manager collaborating with MTD, an events company.- The use iterative approach which create something of value with each iteration. In iteration it specify, design, code and test the project at once in short period of time. Iterative approaches are more predictable. Also feedback from the users is needed.
Vuca structure plays a vital role in decision making, volatility is big issue that must be patiently handled. Likewise uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity. Understanding this these four is key. Then taking calculated and wise decision Will bring about an expected positive results
Iterative and linear method should be combined to get a positive result.
Margaret Ebieme Cohort 16 team 6
Challenges can occur in the macroenvironment, the VUCA FRAMEWORK should not be rule out (volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity).
As a project manager the most common challenges we should always prepare for ;
1 Balancing project constraints: there are three constraints that make up the project management triangle: scope, time and cost. if this three things can be balance the project team will deliver a quality project.
2 Avoiding scope creep: this is when requirements or features increase over a project’s life cycle
3 Managing stakeholder expectations:
4 Identifying project risks
5 Lack of accountability. To overcome this challenges, this following strategies are essential.
My advise as a project manager to the MTD
Iteractive and linear method should all be combined and a regular feedback mechanism set in place
Aminah Yusuff
Team 2 Cohort 16
Given the potential challenges and risks in the environment and society, it’s crucial to recognize the VUCA framework (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity). To overcome these challenges, the following strategies are essential:
– Complexity requires a skilled team and effective communication.
– Uncertainty demands high adaptability, which can be challenging.
To succeed in such conditions, seeing myself as a project manager in the MTD event company, I will evaluate project context, considering factors like requirements stability, timeline, and stakeholder involvement, Implement a hybrid approach, combining agile and iterative methodologies, Balance customer collaboration with iterative development, adapting to project needs.
– I will continue to foster a culture of continuous learning, improving with each iteration.
In summary, The company can elevate its project management by combining iterative and agile methodologies, resulting in more effective change management, enhanced collaboration, and superior event quality. These approaches offer a flexible yet structured framework that seamlessly adapts to the ever-changing landscape of event planning, ensuring successful outcomes.
Challenges and Issues MTD Could Face
Unpredictable Changes: Events often face last-minute changes due to various factors such as client requests, weather, or vendor issues.
Complex Coordination: Managing multiple stakeholders, including clients, vendors, and internal teams, can be challenging.
Tight Deadlines: Events have fixed dates, leaving little room for delays.
Quality Control: Ensuring high quality and consistency in event delivery is crucial for client satisfaction.
Iterative Approach
Implications:
Continuous Improvement: By breaking down the event planning process into smaller iterations, MTD can continuously refine and improve each aspect of the event. Feedback from each iteration can be used to make necessary adjustments.
Flexibility: Iterative planning allows for greater flexibility. If an element of the event isn’t working as planned, it can be revised in the next iteration without affecting the entire project.
Risk Management: Smaller iterations help in identifying and mitigating risks early in the process, reducing the likelihood of major issues closer to the event date.
Stakeholder Engagement: Regular check-ins and updates with stakeholders during each iteration ensure that their expectations are met and any concerns are addressed promptly.
Practical Example:
An event could be planned in phases such as initial concept, vendor selection, venue setup, and final preparations. After each phase, feedback would be gathered and adjustments made before moving on to the next phase.
Agile Approach
Implications:
Adaptability: Agile methodologies, like Scrum or Kanban, provide a structured yet flexible framework to adapt to changes quickly. Agile promotes regular reassessment and adjustment of plans based on real-time feedback.
Collaboration: Agile emphasizes teamwork and communication, fostering collaboration among team members and stakeholders. Regular stand-up meetings and retrospectives ensure that everyone is on the same page.
Value Delivery: By prioritizing tasks based on their value to the client, MTD can ensure that the most important aspects of the event are given precedence and delivered effectively.
Transparency: Agile’s iterative nature provides transparency, allowing clients to see progress and provide input continuously, ensuring that their vision is realized.
Practical Example:
Using Scrum, MTD could organize their event planning into sprints (e.g., 2-week periods). Each sprint would focus on specific deliverables (e.g., booking the venue, confirming the schedule, finalizing decorations). The team would hold daily stand-ups to track progress and identify roadblocks, and after each sprint, they would review progress and plan the next steps.
Advice for MTD
Adopt Iterative Planning: Implement an iterative approach to break down the event planning process into manageable phases. This will help in managing changes more effectively and improving quality continuously.
Implement Agile Methodologies: Use agile frameworks like Scrum or Kanban to enhance flexibility, collaboration, and transparency. This will ensure that the team can quickly adapt to changes and maintain a high level of client satisfaction.
Regular Feedback Loops: Establish regular feedback loops with all stakeholders. This ensures that any issues or changes in requirements are identified early and can be addressed promptly.
Training and Tools: Provide training for the team on agile methodologies and equip them with the necessary tools (e.g., project management software) to facilitate agile practices.
Conclusion
By integrating iterative and agile approaches, MTD can enhance its project management practices, leading to better handling of changes, improved collaboration, and higher quality events. These methodologies provide a structured yet flexible framework that aligns well with the dynamic nature of event planning.
Considering the potential challenges in the environment and society at large, it’s essential to acknowledge the VUCA framework (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity).
To address these challenges this facts have to be known;
– Complexity requires a skilled team and effective communication.
– Uncertainty demands high adaptability, which can be difficult.
To break even here with such challenges, the company should try to;
– Assess the project context, considering factors like requirements stability, timeline, and stakeholder involvement.
– Adopt a hybrid approach, combining agile and iterative methodologies.
– Balance agile customer collaboration with iterative development, leaning towards agile for well-defined projects and iterative development for complex or uncertain projects.
– Foster a culture of continuous learning, using each iteration to improve and adapt.
This could go a long way in providing answers to so many questions and solving the puzzle arising in this situation.
Given the fact that challenges can occur in the macroenvironment, the VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity) framework is not to be ruled out.
-Complexity: Requires skilled team members and effective communication.
-Uncertainty: High adaptability can be challenging in uncertain environments.
Advice for the Company:
Assess Context: Consider project specifics—requirements stability, timeline, and stakeholder involvement.
Hybrid Approach: Combine elements of both methodologies. Use agile for customer collaboration and iterative for development.
Iterate Wisely: If the project is well-defined, lean more toward agile. If it’s complex or uncertain, emphasize iterative development.
Continuous Learning: Encourage learning from each iteration to improve processes and outcomes.
As a project manager working with MTD, I’d recommend adopting an iterative approach to event setup, incorporating agile principles. This would allow for flexibility in responding to changing requirements, rapid delivery, and continuous improvement. Embracing agility would help MTD navigate event management complexities and ensure successful events. Key takeaways:
– Adopt iterative approach with agile principles
– Establish clear goals and priorities
– Foster collaboration and continuous improvement
Using the iterative approach in planning for an event will lead to being transparent, openness and honesty. If the stakeholders and sponsors can get feedback on how the event planning is going, it will be good , what if they have it in mind to make some changes or additions to the event. With the agile approach, feedback might not be regular and it can get the stakeholders and sponsors tense since they don’t know how the planning or project is going.
If an iterative approach was employed in organising an event, there would be short repeatable burst of energy as there would be consistent feedbacks to ascertain that managers have not moved off course. Risk would be mitigated because of daily transparency and speed from frequent meetings.
The implication of employing an agile approach would be that, the project would be in different mini projects which would be handled by experts willing to solve possible problems arising and sponsors would be in the know at all times and would be ready to assist in finances because such information would have been handled in a difficult conversation earlier. If the company sought my advice, I would advice that a hybrid approach should be employed in any project.
Depending on the kind of project at hand and the resources, environment and team. Looking at the VUCA methodology, volatile, uncertainty, complex and ambiguous hybrid will be the best approach to any project in order to prepare the mind of the stakeholders and the team at large.
Iteractive and linear method should all be combined and a regular feedback mechanism set in place
Project managers should always combine the iterative and linear method to get a positive result in managing a project. It will help in the correct analysis of every point accomplished during the project phases
Considering the problems that MTD encountered, I will advise them to focus on a particular demographic in the market particularly the youths who are the most impressionable in other to get the best of their products. Using an interactive approach helps with getting feedbacks anytime. It enables organisation’s to benefit from user and stakeholder feedback anytime
MTD project is responsible for providing water infrastructural for events or festival and using the Tommorrowland Project by MTD as a case study.
I will advise MTD to adopt an hybrid model (i.e. Iterative and Agile model) approach to handling the difficulties in the project
Likely Difficulties faced by MTD
1. Increasing number of users which cannot be determine at each day, daily users or crowds numbers are uncertain but continuous numbers expected
2. Various needs and involvement of many stakeholders
3. Unexpected changes during events and sudden deadlines to handle various scenarios
Benefits and Implications of the Iterative Model for MTD
1. Allows the projects to be broken down into smaller cyclical iterations which can be done in shorter time and allows for sprints to get desired outputs that will form part of the final larger results
2. It can be cost effective and also easily visible to stakeholders to see and give feedback that can be adjusted
3. Regular feedback and testing by users ensure the final service/products its usable
Benefits and Implications of the Agile Model For MTD
1. Its Customer Centric and helps MTD considering that projects are for users events
2. It enables teams to build fast, check/review/test what they have built and iterate their work based on regular feedback
3. Ease of predictability, breakdown of projects into phases for continuous improvement
4. Respond quickly to changing requirements and priorities
5. Improved team work, collaboration and team morale
6. Improved and Efficient Stake holder engagements
A combination of both Iterative and Agile approach will help MTD to deliver the projects faster in phases and simultaneously be able to adapt quickly to changes or challenges that may occur during the events in a cost effective manner and ensuring that its employee’s morale remains high and users satisfaction it’s guaranteed.
The linear of approach and the iterative approach are two processes that a project manager must always bear in mind and work with, whether the environment is stable, predictable, unstable and unpredictable.
In the case of MTD, it is possible to restructure the project in smaller understanding steps to be efficient and achieve the initial results.
With a few staff and an iterative approach, they will be able to focus on the (importance/urgency) pairing by continually adapting to the environment, not forgetting communication between team members
My name is Charles Ntanta and for me, iterative allows for a faster completion of projects in the sense that team members are organized in groups or boxes with specific task that can take two to three weeks. As a group, you’re allowed the freedom of decisions. However, adopting Agility makes you be ahead of solving your challenges and solving them because the software (Scrum) takes care of volatile and uncertainty moments in project management decisions. My honest decision will be to advise for the use of Agile approach.
project managers need to combine techniques from the both approach to achieve maximum results both in stable and volatile environment.
As a project manager working with MTD, the events company, I have learned several valuable lessons this week that could help address the challenges and issues we face in our projects.
Key Learnings:
• Flexibility and Adaptability: It’s crucial to remain flexible in project management to quickly respond to changing circumstances and unexpected challenges.
• Client Feedback Integration: Continuously incorporating client feedback ensures that the final deliverable meets their expectations.
• Effective Communication: Clear and consistent communication within the team and with stakeholders is necessary to avoid misunderstandings and ensure alignment.
Implications of an Iterative Approach:
Adopting an iterative approach to setting up an event involves breaking the project into smaller, manageable phases or iterations. Each iteration focuses on a specific aspect of the event setup, allowing for regular evaluation and adjustments based on feedback and progress.
Benefits:
• Incremental Progress: Allows for steady progress and early detection of issues.
• Continuous Improvement: Each iteration provides opportunities to refine and enhance the project.
• Client Satisfaction: Regular feedback loops ensure the client’s needs and expectations are consistently met.
Challenges:
• Time Management: Requires careful scheduling to ensure iterations are completed within the overall project timeline.
• Resource Allocation: Efficiently managing resources to support multiple iterations can be complex.
Implications of an Agile Approach:
An agile approach emphasizes flexibility, collaboration, and customer-centricity. It involves regular iterations, continuous feedback, and adaptive planning.
Benefits:
• Enhanced Collaboration: Encourages teamwork and active participation from all stakeholders.
• Quick Adaptation: Enables quick responses to changes and new information.
• Customer Focus: Keeps the client’s needs and feedback at the forefront of the project.
Challenges:
• Scope Management: Potential for scope creep if changes are not carefully managed.
• Team Coordination: Requires a high level of coordination and communication among team members.
Advice to MTD:
1. Embrace Iterative and Agile Practices:
• Implement iterative cycles for key aspects of event setup, allowing for regular evaluation and adjustments.
• Foster an agile mindset within the team, focusing on collaboration, flexibility, and customer satisfaction.
2. Enhance Communication:
• Establish clear communication channels and regular check-ins to ensure everyone is aligned and informed.
3. Manage Scope and Resources:
• Clearly define project goals and boundaries to prevent scope creep.
• Efficiently allocate resources to support iterative cycles and ensure timely completion of each phase.
4. Focus on Continuous Improvement:
• Use each iteration as an opportunity to learn, improve, and refine the project approach.
• Encourage feedback from team members and stakeholders to drive continuous enhancement.
By adopting these practices, MTD can better manage the complexities of event projects, deliver high-quality results, and ensure client satisfaction.
Taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project involves breaking down the project into smaller, manageable phases or iterations. Each iteration focuses on delivering a specific set of features or components, with the flexibility to adjust and refine based on feedback received throughout the process.
Implications of an iterative approach:
1. Flexibility: Allows for flexibility in adapting to changing requirements or stakeholder feedback throughout the project lifecycle.
2. Early Feedback: Enables early validation of concepts or ideas, reducing the risk of investing time and resources into aspects that may not meet stakeholder expectations.
3. Continuous Improvement: Facilitates continuous improvement by incorporating lessons learned from each iteration into subsequent ones, leading to better outcomes over time.
4. Risk Mitigation: Helps mitigate project risks by addressing issues early on and minimizing the impact of potential failures.
An Agile approach builds on the iterative framework, emphasizing collaboration, customer feedback, and incremental delivery. It involves principles such as adaptive planning, evolutionary development, and iterative delivery.
Implications of an Agile approach:
1. Customer-Centricity: Prioritizes customer needs and feedback, ensuring the delivered product or service aligns closely with their expectations.
2. Collaborative Environment: Encourages collaboration among cross-functional teams, fostering innovation and collective problem-solving.
3. Adaptability: Embraces change as a natural part of the process, allowing for adjustments to be made quickly in response to evolving requirements or market conditions.
4. Transparency: Promotes transparency through regular communication and visibility into project progress, enabling stakeholders to provide timely input and make informed decisions.
If asked to advise the company, my recommendation would be to adopt an Agile approach to setting up the event project. This would involve:
1. Forming Cross-Functional Teams: Assembling teams with diverse skill sets to facilitate collaboration and innovation throughout the project.
2. Emphasizing Customer Feedback: Prioritizing customer needs and preferences, incorporating feedback into the iterative development process to ensure the event meets their expectations.
3. Iterative Planning and Delivery: Breaking down the project into smaller iterations or sprints, focusing on delivering value incrementally while remaining adaptable to changes.
4. Continuous Improvement: Establishing mechanisms for continuous feedback and reflection, allowing the team to learn from each iteration and improve future iterations accordingly.
5. Clear Communication: Ensuring open and transparent communication among team members and stakeholders, fostering a shared understanding of project goals, progress, and priorities.
By embracing an Agile approach, the company can enhance its ability to deliver successful events that meet the evolving needs of its audience while remaining responsive to market dynamics and changing circumstances.
the linear approach and the iterative approach are two processes that a project manager must always bear in mind, whether the environment is stable and predictable or unstable and unpredictable.
In the case of MTD, it is possible to restructure the project in smaller steps to be efficient and achieve the initial results.
With a small staff and an iterative approach, they will be able to focus on the (importance/urgency) pairing by continually adapting to the environment, not forgetting communication between team members.
MTD faces challenges like last-minute changes, unexpected issues, and tight deadlines. By embracing an iterative approach, MTD can break down event setup into smaller, manageable chunks, allowing for flexibility and quick response to changes. This approach would help MTD navigate uncertainties and deliver successful events.
*Implications of taking an iterative approach:*
An iterative approach would allow MTD to:
– Break down complex tasks into smaller, manageable parts
– Focus on high-priority tasks first
– Adapt quickly to changes and unexpected issues
– Continuously improve and refine event setup processes
– Reduce stress and workload peaks
– Enhance team collaboration and communication
*Implications of an agile approach:*
An agile approach would enable MTD to:
– Respond quickly to changing requirements and priorities
– Deliver small, incremental pieces of the event setup quickly
– Emphasize teamwork, collaboration, and continuous improvement
– Encourage experimentation, learning, and adaptation
– Reduce bureaucracy and increase efficiency
– Improve overall event quality and customer satisfaction
*Advice to MTD:*
If I were asked to advise MTD, I would suggest:
1. Embrace an iterative and agile approach to event setup, focusing on flexibility and adaptability.
2. Break down complex tasks into smaller, manageable chunks, prioritizing high-impact tasks first.
3. Foster a culture of collaboration, continuous improvement, and experimentation.
4. Encourage open communication, active listening, and transparent decision-making.
5. Leverage technology and tools to streamline processes, enhance efficiency, and reduce stress.
6. Prioritize team well-being, recognizing the importance of work-life balance and mental health.
7. Continuously monitor and evaluate event setup processes, identifying areas for improvement and implementing changes as needed.
By adopting these strategies, MTD can overcome challenges, improve event quality, and enhance customer satisfaction, ultimately becoming a more resilient, adaptable, and successful events company.
As a project manager working with MTD,I now understand that combination of linear and iterative approaches in managing same and different projects is possible.
The linear approach helps in preparing/planning ahead for the project.This can begin with a
linear approach while the lifecycle is adapted to incorporate the iterative approach.
There is need to have a concept, define the requirements of the project and then deployment stage.
From this point, the iterative approach can be introduced especially when the project scope is becoming unnecessarily unstable and environment or strategy uncertain.
Also, with the iterative approach several smaller projects (sprints) can be achieved within a short period.
Below are the implications of iteration approach of project management
1.It makes PM to be more flexible and open to more possibilities in achieving the projects
2. Productivity of the project is enhanced
3. Frequent stakeholders engagement is achieved
4. Better output is achieved in the projects
5. It provide opportunity for PM to understand user requirements
The implications of an agile approach are itemised below :
Agile approach allow the team respond quickly by working in short mini-project iterations, or
The approach enhances more productive as the numbers of task per time is reduced
The team using this approach could re-prioritise and change direction quickly.
With agile approach, continuous and dynamic planning can be utilize in an uncertain conditions
Adeniyi Familua
Cohort 15,team 1
As a PM collaborating with MTD, I’ll be open to finding bespoke approaches by combining the best features of the linear and iterative approaches as they suit the execution of the current project. However, I’ll personally favour the iterative approach, utilising the short bursts of energy as well as it’s flexible approach to dealing with complex situations should they arise.
What I learnt as a project manager is to apply different approaches to difference situations.
It also helps us to identify or detect any risk and managing early.
As a project manager working with MTD, I’ve learned how to apply different approaches to difference situations when carrying out products of different nature. This is because of the obvious fact that at some point in the planning, there is need to switch from one approach to the other because of the nature of the work so it can go on simultaneously. So, while the used water is undergoing purification for a reuse(Project 1) another batch of clean water is being transported to homes, offices and everyone and therefore (Project 2), there will not be water scarcity and the projects will be a win-win situation at the end.
As a project manager at MTD, the type of project will dictate the project approach to be used. However, combining iterative and linear approaches offers significant advantages, leading to better, faster, and more successful project outcomes.
I will recommend starting with a linear approach which helps in gathering tangible information necessary for planning and gaining a thorough understanding of the project goals. This approach involves understanding the concept, defining the project, and implementing initial plans. Once a solid foundation is established, an iterative approach can then be applied.
The benefits of integrating both iterative and linear methods include testing ideas and understanding user requirements, accelerating the delivery of project outputs, enhancing stakeholder engagement, increasing visibility and transparency, implementing changes at an early stage thereby reducing the cost and providing assurance to sponsors and stakeholders.
As a project manager I’ve learned how to apply different approaches to difference situations. However adopting the iterative approach can be beneficial because of its flexibility.
It also helps us to identify or detect any risk and managing early.
As a project manager working with MTD, the events company, I have learned several valuable lessons this week that could help address the challenges and issues we face in our projects.
Key Learnings:
Flexibility and Adaptability: Emphasizing the importance of flexibility in project management to quickly respond to changing circumstances and unexpected challenges.
Client Feedback Integration: The significance of continuously incorporating client feedback to ensure the final deliverable meets their expectations.
Effective Communication: The need for clear and consistent communication within the team and with stakeholders to avoid misunderstandings and ensure everyone is on the same page.
Implications of an Iterative Approach:
Adopting an iterative approach to setting up an event involves breaking the project into smaller, manageable phases or iterations. Each iteration focuses on a specific aspect of the event setup, allowing for regular evaluation and adjustments based on feedback and progress.
Benefits:
Incremental Progress: Allows for steady progress and early detection of issues.
Continuous Improvement: Each iteration provides opportunities to refine and enhance the project.
Client Satisfaction: Regular feedback loops ensure the client’s needs and expectations are consistently met.
Challenges:
Time Management: Requires careful scheduling to ensure iterations are completed within the overall project timeline.
Resource Allocation: Efficiently managing resources to support multiple iterations can be complex.
Implications of an Agile Approach:
An agile approach emphasizes flexibility, collaboration, and customer-centricity. It involves regular iterations, continuous feedback, and adaptive planning.
Benefits:
Enhanced Collaboration: Encourages teamwork and active participation from all stakeholders.
Quick Adaptation: Ability to quickly respond to changes and new information.
Customer Focus: Keeps the client’s needs and feedback at the forefront of the project.
Challenges:
Scope Management: Potential for scope creep if changes are not carefully managed.
Team Coordination: Requires a high level of coordination and communication among team members.
Advice to MTD:
1. Embrace Iterative and Agile Practices:
Implement iterative cycles for key aspects of event setup, allowing for regular evaluation and adjustments.
Foster an agile mindset within the team, focusing on collaboration, flexibility, and customer satisfaction.
2. Enhance Communication:
Establish clear communication channels and regular check-ins to ensure everyone is aligned and informed.
3. Manage Scope and Resources:
Clearly define project goals and boundaries to prevent scope creep.
Efficiently allocate resources to support iterative cycles and ensure timely completion of each phase.
4. Focus on Continuous Improvement:
Use each iteration as an opportunity to learn, improve, and refine the project approach.
Encourage feedback from team members and stakeholders to drive continuous enhancement.
By adopting these practices, MTD can better manage the complexities of event projects, deliver high-quality results, and ensure client satisfaction.
As a project manager working with MTD, the events company, I’ve learned that taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project could help address some of the challenges and issues being faced. An iterative approach which involves breaking down the project into smaller, easy to manage chunks, and repeating the process of planning, execution, and review in a cyclical manner.
This will be the implications of using an iterative approach:
1. Improved flexibility: which a
llows for easier adaptation to changes and unexpected issues.
2. Enhanced risk management: This helps in identifying and mitigates risks earlier in the process.
3. Better stakeholder engagement: Will help in encouraging continuous feedback and involvement from users.
4. Increased efficiency:This will help to reduce waste and optimizes resources available
5. Higher quality outcomes: This will ensure thorough planning and execution.
Implications of an agile approach:
1. Faster time-to-market
2. Increased collaboration: (Fostering cross-functional teams and open communication).
3. Emphasis on value delivery: This prioritizes delivering value to our customers and stakeholders.
4. Continuous improvement: Encourages learning and adaptation to changes
5. Adaptability to change: In the event of change and uncertainty.
Advice to MTD:
1. Adopt an iterative and agile approach to project management.
2. Break down events into smaller, manageable chunks (e.g., venue selection, marketing, logistics).
3. Establish a cross-functional team with clear roles to carry out and their responsibilities.
4. Make topmost continuous stakeholder engagement and feedback.
5. Emphasize more on value delivery and continuous improvement.
6. Be flexible and adapt to changes and unexpected issues.
7. Monitor progress and adjust the approach as it progresses.
By adopting an iterative and agile approach, MTD will better navigate through the complexities and uncertainties of event planning, improve their responsiveness to changing requirements, and deliver higher-quality events that meet their clients’ needs.
As a project manager collaborating with MTD, I will advise the company to deploy a hybrid project approach because of it’s advantages, having observed the nature of their project.
Kennedy Anyanwu
Cohort 15
As a project manager in MTD, the type of project determines the project approach to be used. however, a combination of iterative and linear approaches will be more advantageous.
During this training, I learned that the best project methodology to be adopted for a project should depend on the project type. This will help the Project manager craft a bespoke approach, techniques, and methods for handling the project. This is exactly what I will advise MTD to do, use the hybrid method while combining the strength of both the waterfall and agile method of project management.
Mary Ayo
By project agility, the iterative method is what organizations and projects managers should adopt, so, as to sectionalize, and manage each stage of the project, getting feedbacks and minimize risk.
As a project manager, I have learned to apply different approaches to different issues depending on what the case may be.
However, adopting the iterative approach to projects can be beneficial because of its flexibility.
While Iterative approach such as the Agile Methodology would be faster in terms of delivering the Minimum Viable Product to customer; however, in reality the type of project to be embarked upon determines what approach is to be adopted.
In the case of MTD, a hybrid route could be taken where we start off with the Linear/Waterfall method to properly define and conceptualize the project to put it into proper contest to give it a head start; and then conclude with the Iterative approach to ensure real time testing and feedback to improve the product outcomes.
Drawing from my understanding of project agility, MTD, an events company, stands to gain by embracing an iterative methodology for managing event projects. By segmenting these projects into manageable stages, it enables ongoing feedback loops and adaptations, thereby mitigating risks and enhancing results. Furthermore, integrating agile methodologies such as Scrum or Kanban would bolster teamwork, flexibility, and responsiveness to evolving circumstances within MTD’s teams. Encouraging MTD to establish interdisciplinary teams, emphasize iterative planning, uphold consistent communication channels, cultivate adaptability, and empower teams can notably elevate their project management prowess and deliver outstanding event experiences.
As an upcoming project manager, the insights gained are how linear, iterative and agile approach can be combined to produce a successful execution of project.
Consequence of iterative approach is that it gives time ultimatum for the project to be executed which is mainly between 2-4 weeks of testing the ideas and all boxes of the project are to be checked and done accordingly by getting a feedback from users or businesses if the project is fit to be finally executed.
Implications of adopting agile approach are;
1. It gives feedback
2. It works well while building websites
3. It has risks meditation
4. It is cheaper
5. It builds right solution
My recommendation as a project manager of MTD is that combination of linear and iterative approach is best for the company.
As a project manager in MTD, the type of project determines the project approach to used. however, combination of iterative and linear approach will be more advantageous, it produces better and faster and successful project. Starting the project with linear approach will help me to get the tangible information for me to plan and also get better understanding about the project goals (understanding the concept, having a defined description of the project, and also implementing). Then I can now have apply iterative approach. The advantages of both iterative and linear includes: testing ideas and learning about user requirements, accelerating delivery of project outputs, improving the stakeholders engagement, increasing visibility and transparency, providing assurance to sponsors and stakeholders
From the insights that I have gotten this week, I would recommend, that the MTD project use the hybrid approach
which is a combination of llinear and iterative approaches. Using both will help MTD to
1. Test ideas and learn about users’ requirements
2. There will be accelerated delivery of project output.
3. Improves stakeholder engagement.
4. Increases visibility and transparency
5. Give assurance to sponsors and stakeholders
6. There will be Increased accountability.
The consequences of using the iterative method are
1. Risk mitigation, the approach identifies risk and tackles it as quickly as possible
2. There’stransparency
3. Frequent team interaction
4. Prompt decision-making and implementation
Umeanolue Lilian
Team 6
Based on what I learnt on MTD project management, a combination of linear and iterative approach wouldn’t be a bad inculcation. The linear approach is necessary as it helps to prepare in advance for the project. The project may begin with a linear approach while the lifecycle is adapted to incorporate the iterative approach. This is achieved by, having an idea of what is expected, defining the requirements of the project and then deployment. From this point, the iterative approach can be introduced because
1. The rise in productivity is assured
2. It allows stakeholders engagement freely and frequently
3. It will help the PM understand what the user requirement are.
4. It allows for users and stakeholders’ feedback.
5. It ensures the output is of improved quality due to constant collaboration and reviews .
Based on what we’ve learned about project agility, MTD, an events company, could benefit from adopting an iterative approach to event projects. Breaking down these projects into manageable phases allows for continuous feedback and adjustments, reducing risks and improving outcomes. Additionally, embracing agile practices like Scrum or Kanban would enhance collaboration, adaptability, and responsiveness to change within MTD’s teams. Advising MTD to form cross-functional teams, prioritize iterative planning, maintain continuous communication, foster flexibility, and empower teams can significantly improve their project management capabilities and deliver exceptional event experiences.
As a project manager working with MTD, a combination of linear and iterative approach wouldn’t be a bad inculcation. The linear approach is necessary as it helps to prepare in advance for the project. The project may begin with a linear approach while the lifecycle is adapted to incorporate the iterative approach. This is achieved by, having an idea of what is expected, defining the requirements of the project and then deployment. From this point, the iterative approach can be introduced because
1. The rise in productivity is assured
2. It allows stakeholders engagement freely and frequently
3. It will help the PM understand what the user requirement are.
Based on the insight I got from what I have learnt so far and applying it to the MTD, I will suggest that MTD should first of all use both Iterative and Linear methods for there management style. And also they should try and improve on there stakeholder feedback to enable them Identify the gaps and lapses they have.
The consequences of using Iterative methods are:
1. Flexibility of the process.
2. Improved risk management.
3. It gives room for improved collaboration among team members.
4. It allows for users and stakeholders’ feedback.
5. It ensures the output is of improved quality due to constant collaboration and reviews .
The implications of using Agile approach are,
1. *Increased adaptability*: Embracing change and responding quickly to new requirements and priorities.
2. *Improved collaboration*: Cross-functional teams working closely together, fostering open communication and shared ownership.
3. *Enhanced customer satisfaction*: Delivering value early and often, with a focus on meeting customer needs and expectations.
4. *Faster time-to-market*: Releasing products or services quickly, allowing for earlier feedback and competitive advantage.
5. *Greater employee engagement*: Empowering teams to make decisions, take ownership, and continuously improve processes.
Name: Malik Ajoke
A.This week I have learnt that adopting and combining an iterative and agile approach will help a project manager achieve a successful and stress-free project planning experience.
B. Implications of an iterative approach:
– iterative approach is Flexible in responding to changes or unexpected issues.
– iterative approach gives room for continuous learning and improvement
C. Implications of an agile approach:
-Agile approach has Strong focus on teamwork and collaboration
-Agile approach lay Emphasis on delivering small, functional components quickly.
D. Advice to the company is to combine both agile and iterative for a better result by embracing iterative approach to the event planning which allows flexibility and adaptability at the same time deploy agile (Scrum) to enhance team collaboration and rapid response to change.
It’s critical to carefully analyse the option between linear, iterative, and hybrid project management methodologies based on the particular environmental conditions and project needs, especially in light of the challenges MTD faces as an event organising firm. As a project manager, I recommend that the project be carried out using a linear and iterative strategy. This promotes flexibility and versatility. For example, the project manager can quickly switch to an iterative strategy if the linear technique seems time-consuming and isn’t producing the expected results. This will expedite the project.
I will suggest the use of both project approaches because if the Linear approach is not giving the required result the project manager will immediately adopt the iterative approach, that way it will save the project from crashing.
In Project Management, different approacheds have their own benefits/consequences. In this case for MTD incorporating the iterative approach will have the following consequeces:
1. Flexibility: Iterative methods allow for flexibility, especially in instances where requirements would need to be changed. This also gives them time to adjust and refine as they go.
2. Stakeholder Engagement: Iterative methods involve stakeholders throughout the process (iterations) allowing regular feedback which leads to greater and more collaboration.
3. Transparency: This approach emphasizes transparency with frequent demonstrations of progress to the stakeholders.
4. Risk Reduction: By breaking down the project into smaller and manageable chunks, teams can identify and address risks earlier in the project.
Implications of iterative approach in a project
1. Flexibility of the process.
2. Improved risk management.
3. It gives room for improved collaboration among team members.
4. It allows for users and stakeholders’ feedback.
5. It ensures the output is of improved quality due to constant collaboration and reviews .
As a project manager working with MTD, I would suggest a combination of linear and iterative approach. The linear approach is crucial as it helps us to prepare in advance for the project. The project may begin with a linear approach while the lifecycle is adapted to incorporate the iterative approach. This is done by having an idea, defining the requirements of the project and then deployment. After deployment, the iterative approach can be introduced.
I believe this method would be beneficial as it:
1. Increases productivity.
2. Improve stakeholders engagement.
3. Helps to test ideas and learn about users requirement.
4. Accelerates delivery of project output.
5. Provides assurance for sponsors and stakeholders.
Being a progect manager I suggest that the Linear and iterative approach be applied in executing the project. This is beneficial for flexibility. i.e, if the linear approach is appearing like it’s time consuming and it not fulfilling the desired outcome, the project manager can easily switch to iterative approach which will speed up the project
Given the obstacles faced by MTD as an event organizing company, it’s crucial to carefully consider the choice between linear, iterative, and hybrid project management approaches based on the specific environmental conditions and project requirements. Each approach carries its own set of advantages and implications, necessitating a thorough assessment to ensure successful project delivery.
Employing a linear approach for event organization can provide clarity, predictability, and progress tracking. However, it may be less adaptable to change and innovation compared to more iterative or agile approaches. Linear project structures are best suited for stable environments with well-defined requirements and minimal uncertainties.
On the other hand, adopting an agile approach could be beneficial for MTD, fostering collaboration, adaptability, and customer-centricity, which are vital in navigating the complexity and ambiguity inherent in many event organizing scenarios. Agile methodologies excel in dynamic and uncertain environments, empowering teams to effectively respond to changes and deliver incremental value.
In my opinion, I would recommend considering a hybrid or mixed approach that integrates elements of linear and iterative methods. The project management profession now acknowledges the value of leveraging both linear and iterative techniques, offering a range of methods and practices to address the diverse challenges and complexities of projects.
A hybrid approach would enable MTD to harness the strengths of both linear and iterative methodologies. The linear components could provide structure and predictability for well-defined aspects of event organization, while the iterative elements would facilitate flexibility, adaptability, and continuous improvement in areas characterized by higher uncertainty or ambiguity.
Ultimately, the choice should be driven by a comprehensive evaluation of the project’s specific needs, environmental conditions, and the organization’s capabilities and preferences. By embracing a flexible and tailored approach, MTD can effectively navigate the challenges of event organization and deliver successful projects that meet stakeholder expectations.
Considering the difficulties that MTD encounters, I suggest that the Linear and iterative approach be applied in executing the project. This is beneficial for flexibility. i.e, if the linear approach is appearing like it’s time consuming and it not fulfilling the desired outcome, the project manager can easily switch to iterative approach which will speed up the project
Considering the difficulties that MTD encounters, I suggest that the Linear and iterative approach be applied in executing the project. This is beneficial for flexibility. i.e, if the linear approach is appearing like it’s time consuming and it not fulfilling the desired outcome, the project manager can easily switch to iterative approach which will speed up the project
As a project manager collaborating with MTD, I will recommend the linear and iterative approaches becaus of efficiency based on the involvement of ‘sprint’ and agile methods
With MTD being a construction company its processes would naturally be drawn to the linear project lifecycle. With the indication numerous challenges, there is need to run a combine approach both iterative and linear. Before this is carried out, phases of the project should be categorized into level of priority as regards the customers, users and sponsors, and also on the basis of stability and instability to understand sections of the project that can accept both the linear and iterative approach. That way the Pm can attempt to avoid a scope creep or failure of the project.
As a project manager collaborating with MTD, I will recommend the linear and iterative approaches becaus of efficiency based on the involvement of ‘sprint’ and agile methods that are being used to check and amend areas where VUCA occur.
CHINONYE DANIEL-UKAEGBU
COHORT 15
TEAM 3.
Osuji Mirian
May 10,2024@3:29 pm
As PM I will suggest the use of linear and iterative approach to be used by MTD, because it provide accurate and enhance quick delivery of the project carried out by the team
Considering the difficulties and problems the MTD encounter in projects, I suggest the combination of linear and iterative approach be adopted in their project, and ensures both approaches are appropriately utilized.
In an event where the business strategy and scope are likely to change and feedback or ideas are needed; iterative approach is best suitable for such event as project. Also, where the environment for the event are stable I advice linear approach be adopted.
My recommendation to the company is before adopting the iterative approach the business environment should be analyzed/studied for stability and instability. If unstable, I recommend Iterative or agile approach and there will be no implications or consequences.
Considering the difficulties and problems the MTD encounter in projects, I suggest the combination of linear and iterative approach be adopted in their project, and ensures both approaches are appropriately utilized.
In an event where the business strategy and scope are likely to change and feedback or ideas are needed; iterative approach is best suitable for such event as project. Also, where the environment for the event are stable I advice linear approach be adopted.
My recommendation to the company is before adopting the iterative approach the business environment should be analyzed/studied for stability and instability. If unstable, I recommend Iterative or agile approach and there will be no implications or consequences.
Considering some of the challenges MTD has encountered as an event organising company, project environmental conditions vary from stable to unstable environments hence the options of linear, iterative and hybrid are all valid options to be considered to deliver successful projects.
If a linear approach was employed in organizing an event as a project, what would be the consequences?
Linear project structures offer clarity, predictability, progress tracking, less adaptable to change and innovation compared to more iterative or agile approaches. It’s essential to carefully consider the specific needs and characteristics of each project when selecting the most appropriate project structure.
Similarly, what are the implications of adopting an agile approach?
By embracing agile methodologies, MTD can better navigate complexity and ambiguity in operating environments which typifies many of its working situation. Agile fosters collaboration, adaptability, and customer-centricity to achieve goals in dynamic and uncertain environments.
If the company sought your advice, what would you recommend?
There has been a tendency in the project profession to regard linear and iterative project methods and lifecycles as incompatible – or even irreconcilably opposed. But this is changing in the project management world: the profession now recognises the value of both linear and iterative methods, and the spectrum of techniques and practices that they offer to deliver successful projects in volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous environments.
The project profession now recognises that linear, iterative and mixed or hybrid approaches present a spectrum of methods and practices, and an extensive toolkit for project managers to use when facing the myriad challenges of projects in a complex world. All are viable options depending on project need and circumstances.
As a PM, this would be my suggestion to MTD. Yes, Linear and Iterative approach would bring solutions that will enhance quick delivery of the project but team members would have to be trained so that they can fit into the work flow system, since the iterative method will create synergy and bring speed and it is repeatable.
Considering the difficulties that MTD encounters, I suggest that the Linear and iterative approach be applied in executing the project. This is beneficial for flexibility. i.e, if the linear approach is appearing like it’s time consuming and it not fulfilling the desired outcome, the project manager can easily switch to iterative approach which will speed up the project and at the end becomes satisfactory to the end users.
Iterative approach has its benefits and likewise it’s challenges.
This is a very fast approach where it’s focus on completion of projects.
It also has the interest of the end users as project can be completed at their pace.
This approach also depends on feedback from users and manges time perfectly.
Its implications includes: depending on feedback from users and not getting adequate time to carry out necessary processes online the linear approach.
Agile approach nullifies the difficulty of the VUCA i.e the vitality, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity that managers face while executing a project because the software was designed to cater for challenges in relating to that.
I will advice MTD to go for Agile.
As a project manager in MTD i will surely apply linear and iterative approach. The linear approach follows stage by stage and must be completed before another i feel this approach can be easily understood and in the area of iterative project, they aid in feedback and building the right solution and in this approach it works in the area of protocol, minimum viable products and agile is introduce. There are benefits which come under agile, they include: transparency, speed, scrumb framework, planning meetings etc.
As a project manager in MTD i will apply linear and iterative approach. The linear approach follows stage by stage and must be completed before another i feel this approach can be easily understood and in the area of iterative project, they help in feed back and building the right solution and in this approach it works in the area of protocol, minimum viable products and agile is introduce. There are benefits which ckme under agile, they include: transparency, speed, scrumb framework, planning meetings etc.
The implication of an iterative approach is that projects are conceived as experiments, executed in bits and pieces, with speed and accuracy, and by competent hands, and are programmed for completion and user satisfaction. Therefore the attendant consequences are that team members must be skillful, open to risks and learn new things, fast, committed and tactful.
I have learnt that we live in a volatile, uncertain, complex, and an ambiguous (VUCA) world, therefore, my advise to MTD would be to:
Break down large projects into mini projects that are deployable in 2-4 weeks and are worked on by a team of competent workers
Review progress made and challenges faced every 2-4 weeks with team members and communicate same to stakeholders
Design projects that are amenable to linear and iterative approaches
As an MTD project manager, I will recommend the linear and iterative approach for some reasons which include there effectiveness in:
1) Time management: In event management and life in general, time management is key to the success of anything. the linear approach guarantees effective time management. It ensures that tasks are delivered as at when due. Also dependencies between tasks are identified and addressed at the appropriate time.
2) Customer’s satisfaction: It provides management with the ability to get feedbacks from clients during the sprints .
As a project manager working with MTD, I will suggest a combination of both the iterative and the agile method in planning. This is because of the obvious fact that at some point in the planning, there is need for a one after the other approach while at some point, some aspects of the work can go on concurrently. So, while the used water is undergoing purification for a reuse, another batch of clean water is being transported to homes, offices and everyone and therefore, there will not be water scarcity.
I mean that I would suggest both the linear and iterative method.
As the project manager in MTD I will use both linear and iterative approach so that there will be an increased accountability, visibility, transparency and improved stakeholders engagement.
Applying this both method will help me provide assurance to sponsors and stalk holders.
implications of adopting an agile approach helps to get feedback each time to make sure we are organizing the right solution to the right people and haven’t gone off from the right direction. Risk can be easily identified in agile and actions can be taken as early as possible which makes it cheaper and less risky.
As a PM there is need to be proactive in responding to any challenges. Every project and the environment has its own volatilities and uncertainties. As a result of this there is need to collaborate with other professionals PM as we learn from each other in addressing the current challenge
Working as a PM in MTD I would consider combining linear and iteratative approach considering the advantages which include
* Testing ideas and learning about user’s requirements.
* Accelerating delivery of project outputs
* Better in stakeholders engagement
* Increases accountability.
As a project manager with MTD I will apply the linear and iterative approach because of.
1) Time management: As an event company,time is key the linear approach will make planning and deployment to un smoothly.
For the iterative approach
2) Customer’s satisfaction: I will be able to get feedbacks from the sponsors during the sprints .
The consequences of using agile is that mistakes that cannot be reversed might be made.
As an MTD project manager, I will recommend the two approaches, as the planning in sprints can help with efficiency and proper delivery of project goals
As a project manager collaborating with MTD, I would recommend both linear and iterative approach to MTD (an events company) for the following reasons:
1. Client Satisfaction: With a well-organized and methodical approach, events are sure to be executed seamlessly, meeting client expectations. This enhances client satisfaction and can lead to repeat business and positive referrals.
2. Structured Workflow: a linear approach provides a clear and structured workflow, allowing teams to follow a step-by-step process from initial planning to execution and evaluation. This reduces confusion and ensures tasks are completed in a logical order.
3. Efficient Resource Allocation: By outlining tasks chronologically, it helps in allocating resources such as time, budget, and manpower more efficiently. This minimizes wastage and improves overall productivity.
4. Timeline Management: A linear approach aids in creating and managing timelines effectively. It ensures deadlines are met, milestones are achieved, and dependencies between tasks are identified and addressed in a timely manner.
5. A linear approach helps in identifying potential risks early in the planning stage, allowing teams to develop contingency plans and mitigate risks before they escalate and impact the event.
6. Clear task sequencing enhances communication among team members, stakeholders, and vendors. Everyone understands their roles and responsibilities, leading to smoother collaboration and fewer misunderstandings.
7. Following a linear approach promotes thoroughness and attention to detail at each stage of event planning. This leads to higher quality outcomes and enhances the overall success of the event.
By leveraging a linear approach, events companies can streamline their operations, deliver high-quality events, and maintain a competitive edge in the industry.
As a project manager collaborating with MTD, I will recommend the linear and iterative approaches because of efficiency based on the involvement of ‘sprint’ and agile methods that are being used to check and amend areas where VUCA occur.
Chukwudi Kingsley Ononiwu
COHORT 15
TEAM 3.
For MTD when event planning, I’d recommend the company to adopt both iterative and agile methodologies. They can begin with defining their objectives and group the event into smaller manageable tasks. Asking for feedback, at the end of each cycle, and the team make all necessary adjustments real time as things change.
With this approach MTD to be ready for changes as they occurs and can learn as they go to improve the experience for all stakeholders involved. This process needs everyone activly participating and dapting to new information and changes.
As a project manager, taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project has several implications, which are:
1. An iterative approach allows for gradual progress as iteration focuses on specific aspects of the event, such as planning, logistics, marketing, and execution, thereby reducing the risk of missing critical details.
2. Iterations give room for opportunities for feedback from stakeholders, team members, and participants. This feedback helps identify areas for improvement and ensures alignment with the event’s goals.
3. The approach also allows adjustments based on changing circumstances. If unexpected challenges arise, the team can adapt and modify their plans in the next iteration.
4. It gives room to proper risk management due to the breakdown of events into smaller phases, as risks are easier to identify and manage. Teams can address issues early.
*Agile approach* implications for event set up as a project:
1. Agile emphasizes flexibility adaptability and responsiveness to change. It helps the event organizers plan based on real-time feedback and evolving requirements.
2. Agile promotes collaboration among cross-functional teams by involving various stakeholders such as marketing, logistics, and sponsors throughout the process.
3. Agile uses sprint iterations to ensure regular progress. This helps the event teams to achieve milestones quickly and continuously refine their approach.
4. Agile prioritizes customer needs. Event organizers can focus on delivering value to attendees, sponsors, and partners.
Advice for the company
Given the context, I will advise the company to engage with both the iterative and agile approaches in setting up events as a project. Start with a clear vision and break down the event into manageable phases. Gather feedback, learn from each iteration, and adapt as needed. Collaboration and flexibility are key. Remember that successful events are customer-centric and require continuous improvement
As an MTD Project manager I will input the use of linear and interactive method for efficiency and to deliver an effective adequate results for the end users.
As a project manager i will use both linear and iletare approach for efficiency and results delivery.
Because what the company and client want is a work well done,
As a project manager on the MTD water project, I will adopt the use of hybrid(combination of linear and iterative).
The iterative will enable feedbacks to be gotten from stakeholders and provide transparent work flow
As an MTD project manager, I would recommend the use of both linear and iterative methods for efficiency and to ensure project implementation and the need to meet up with the end users needs.
As a project manager with MTD i will use both linear and iletare approach for efficiency and results delivery.
As an MTD project manager, I’ll recommend the hybrid use of both linear and iterative techniques to ensure project implementation. This methods distinct in their way will allow me oversee the management of the a progressional cycle especially where the project scope is unlike to change, reliable information is available about the objectives and expected deliverables and stakeholders demand a predictable project process. However, for novel or complex projects where the scope is likely to change and users demand feedback/input to deliver project expectations, I’ll employ the iterative or agile method, ensuring deliverables and feedback are gotten bi-weekly in sprints to keep the project on track and deliver the overall goal of a completed work.
As a project manager I will recommend the MTD to implying iterative and Agile approach because of complexity, ambiguity and need to meet up with the end users satisfaction.
As a MTD project manager, I would recommend the use of both linear and iterative methods which will largely depends on my analysis about the project. In as much as iterative can speed up process, not all project requires it use such as construction. But here, using the linear approach will cause each activity to be done in step with proper follow up and delivery on slated timeline for the commencement of other stages while using iterative, all members involved in each stages can go ahead with their task ensuring delivery of project in time which allows for flexibility.
The iterative method, while effective, can require additional management and can be time-consuming due to its cyclical nature. As a project manager, it is important for me to thoroughly research the type of event or project at hand to determine the best method to use. Factors such as project scope, timeline, and team size would be taken into consideration when deciding whether or not to use an iterative approach. Ultimately, the goal is to select the approach that will result in the most efficient and successful outcome for the project.
As a MTD project manager, I would recommend employing both linear and iterative methodologies. The linear approach provides a structured progression, requiring the completion of one phase before advancing to the next, which ensures systematic project development. Concurrently, the iterative method divides tasks into smaller, manageable segments, allowing for ongoing responses from stakeholders and end users. This dual strategy not only maintains continuous engagement with key stakeholders but also allows for flexible adjustments in response to evolving project requirements and answers.
As a PM, I will advise the MTD company to work with agile approach because of an uncertainty and volatility.
In order to be an effective and efficient PM one has to be very intelligent and proactive, that is, knowing when to apply the linear or the iterative approach. The PM amy likely commence the project using the linear approach, then agile could be introduced as event unfolds due to challenges. The team could spring to brainstorm and proffer solutions. Also, stakeholders who make not be actively involved in the project could be engaged to provide information they would serve as a feedback. Adopting agile helps to manage uncertainties, volatility, Ambiguity and complexities in any given project.
As a PM I will advice MTD to take the iterative approach, this will enable us to test the ideas and get feedbacks, and if there’s need to make adjustments, it can be done easily
As a project manager one need to always be ready to tackle any challenges because in a project there maybe volatilities and uncertainties. As a pm we thrives in chaos.
Working as a pm in MTD I would consider combining linear and iteratative approach considering the advantages which include
* Testing ideas and learning about user’s requirements.
* Accelerating delivery of project outputs
* Better in stakeholders engagement
* Increases accountability.
This would involve breaking down the project events.
Implication of iterative method are: Flexibility, increamental progress, risk management, enhance stockholders collaboration
Implications of an agile approach are:
Continuous improvement, empowered team, transparency and customer satisfaction.
If am the project manager of MTD I will recommend working with the iterative method as that will help manage risk and make the process a lot more faster, and changes can be done at intervals when the stakeholders or clients have issues with the deliverables of the project.
So far, I learned that effective project management requires adaptability and a proactive approach to address challenges.
Taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project would involve breaking the project into smaller phases or iterations. Each iteration would include planning, execution, and evaluation. This approach allows for continuous improvement and adjustments based on feedback received.
Implications of an iterative approach:
1. Flexibility: It allows for changes and adjustments during the project to incorporate stakeholder feedback.
2. Incremental progress: Each iteration builds upon the previous one, ensuring gradual development towards the final event.
3. Risk management: Iterative approach enables early identification and mitigation of project risks.
4. Enhanced stakeholder collaboration: Iterative feedback loops involve stakeholders in the decision-making process, increasing satisfaction and engagement.
On the other hand, an agile approach aligns well with project management practices. Agile frameworks, such as Scrum or Kanban, are known for their iterative and incremental nature, emphasizing close collaboration and adaptability.
Implications of an agile approach:
1. Continuous improvement: Regularly reviewing and adapting processes leads to enhanced efficiency and effectiveness.
2. Empowered teams: Agile promotes self-organizing teams, improving communication and decision-making.
3. Transparency: Frequent communication and transparency throughout the project enable better visibility and early issue detection.
4. Customer satisfaction: Agile provides opportunities to involve customers in the project, ensuring alignment with their expectations.
If I were to advise MTD, I would suggest considering an iterative approach combined with agile principles. This would involve breaking down the event project into manageable iterations, adopting an agile framework, promoting frequent collaboration with stakeholders, and embracing a continuous improvement mindset. Additionally, using project management tools and techniques to track progress and manage tasks efficiently would be beneficial.
If I was to work with MTD as a project manager, I’d suggest using both linear and iterative methods. The linear approach ensures project growth by following certain steps. One phase has to be completed before moving on to the next, while the iterative method breaks tasks into smaller projects, gathering feedback from stakeholders and end users. This approach fosters continuous engagement with major stakeholders throughout the process and facilitates easy adaptation to changes
This week, I learned that effective project management requires adaptability and a proactive approach to address challenges.
Taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project would involve breaking the project into smaller phases or iterations. Each iteration would include planning, execution, and evaluation. This approach allows for continuous improvement and adjustments based on feedback received.
Implications of an iterative approach:
1. Flexibility: It allows for changes and adjustments during the project to incorporate stakeholder feedback.
2. Incremental progress: Each iteration builds upon the previous one, ensuring gradual development towards the final event.
3. Risk management: Iterative approach enables early identification and mitigation of project risks.
4. Enhanced stakeholder collaboration: Iterative feedback loops involve stakeholders in the decision-making process, increasing satisfaction and engagement.
On the other hand, an agile approach aligns well with project management practices. Agile frameworks, such as Scrum or Kanban, are known for their iterative and incremental nature, emphasizing close collaboration and adaptability.
Implications of an agile approach:
1. Continuous improvement: Regularly reviewing and adapting processes leads to enhanced efficiency and effectiveness.
2. Empowered teams: Agile promotes self-organizing teams, improving communication and decision-making.
3. Transparency: Frequent communication and transparency throughout the project enable better visibility and early issue detection.
4. Customer satisfaction: Agile provides opportunities to involve customers in the project, ensuring alignment with their expectations.
If I were to advise MTD, I would suggest considering an iterative approach combined with agile principles. This would involve breaking down the event project into manageable iterations, adopting an agile framework, promoting frequent collaboration with stakeholders, and embracing a continuous improvement mindset. Additionally, using project management tools and techniques to track progress and manage tasks efficiently would be beneficial.
Projects are usually filled with volatility and uncertainty for most part,As a project manager one should always be chaos ready. As a project manager working with MTD I will recommend working with the iterative method as that will help with risk management and make the process a lot more faster, and changes can be done when the stakeholders or clients have issues with the deliverables of the project.
Agile approach or model is basically the most commonly used iterative method, it basically will help make the project a lot more faster and every stakeholder happy with the end result as their feedback must have been received.
I will recommend a hybrid approach and basically selecting tools and approach best suited for a project, as every project is different in one way or the other.
This week, I’ve learned about the benefits of taking an iterative or agile approach to setting up events.
First, an iterative approach means breaking down the event setup into smaller phases. This can help us identify issues early and make improvements along the way. It’s like building and refining step by step.
I also learnt that it is possible to combine linear and iterative cycles to get the best out of a project. The advantages of combining both are:
• Testing ideas and learning about user requirements
• Accelerating delivery of project outputs
• Improving stakeholder engagement
• Increasing visibility and transparency
• Providing assurance to sponsors and stakeholders
• Increasing accountability
On the other hand, an agile approach involves flexibility and collaboration. We can adapt to changes quickly, prioritize tasks based on their importance, and involve clients and stakeholders throughout the process.
For MTD, I’d suggest combining both approaches. Start with clear goals and timelines, then break down tasks into manageable chunks. Stay flexible to changes and keep communication open with clients and team members. This way, we can deliver successful events while staying adaptable and responsive to client needs.
As a project manager collaborating with MTD, we excel amidst chaos and challenges. Hence, I propose integrating both linear and iterative methods. The linear approach ensures project progression step by step, with each phase completed before moving on to the next, while the iterative method breaks tasks into smaller projects, gathering feedback from stakeholders and end users. This approach fosters continuous engagement with major stakeholders throughout the process and facilitates easy adaptation to changes.
As project manager, we are crises managers and we thrive in chaos. I will advise that iterative or hybrid method be deployed. Since the project involves uncertainties and volatility, iterative method will help alot in the area of feedback, flexibility, change and speed. Iterative method will help to correct errors before they get out of hand and also reduce risks. I will advise MTD to look in the direction of hybrid method so as to deliver projects with innovation
It’s a normal thing to face challenges in work places as a whole and project managers are not exceptions. What makes a project manager different from others, are the approaches they decide to use to overcome this challenges. So far, I have learnt that the approaches used by project managers are the Linear approach and Iterative approach. As a project manager collaborating with MTD, I will make use of the Iterative approach, also known as Agile approach. This is because it helps in getting the feedback the team needs, to ensure they are actually working on the right project that will answer the needs of the stakeholders, and as we all know, feedbacks are very important in every project. Also, Iterative approach will help to focus on the most important part of the project, which will speed up the completion of the project at hand. Iterative approach also helps to discover best features to use for the project. The implications of adopting an Iterative approach are; improved risk management, improved collaboration, enhances customers’ satisfaction, and enhances stakeholders’ engagement.
Although the combination of both approaches(linear and iterative approaches) will be very good for the project based on what we’ve been taught, I will still advice MTD to go with the Iterative approach.
As a project manager collaborating with MTD, and encountering challenges as stipulated by VUCA approaches ; which are complexity, uncertainty, volatility and ambiguity, no matter which one of them is a challenge to the project. As a project manager, I with go with iterative method, if not the combined of both methods. But on the safe side, I stick with agile method. Here is, it’s enablement :
. It enables the project to be liable to changes.
. Enables you to work speedy and quickly
. Here stakeholders are also included and involved too
. And during each scrum, you create something of value.
. Most importantly, it’s helps with feedback from the environment, which is needed to validate and make decisions.
So, I advice the MTD to go for the agile methodology, because complete work is more important to sponsors and the organisation than the project plans and report.
As a project manager collaborating with MTD
I will Combine both Linear and Iterative method considering the advantages which include
* Accountability and transparency
* Assurance to sponsors and stakeholders
* Better in stakeholders engagement
* Increased project output.
Considering the difficulties and problems that MTD encounters in their projects, what insights have you gained this week that could offer assistance? The insight have gained this is week is that as a project Manager one must be quick in his thinking and must be always ready to adapt to change and improvise as some project will not go as expected especially a project that is not predictable.
If an iterative approach were employed in organizing an event as a project, what would be the consequences? The major consequence for iterative approach for me is that the project could be end without been finished putting all managers effort to waste, another is that the risk is very high and the outcome is not predictable.
The approach i will advice company depend on the condition of the events, if is predictable or unpredictable event,
As a project manager, i’ll weigh the benefits and implications of different approaches.
I’ll consider using a linear approach, if;
The project’s scope probably won’t change. We can guess how long it will take and how much it will cost. We know what we want to achieve and what results to expect. Skilled people are ready to work on it. Everyone involved likes to plan and follow a clear process.
But, if the surroundings, business plan, and project plan might change. We need feedback from users or customers to check business ideas and make decisions. It’s more vital to deliver quickly than to have a perfect product. The project team has to learn new skills to make something new or inventive. Finishing the work matters more to sponsors and the organization than having plans and reports. I’ll use an iterative approach
Also, we might have to adopt an agile approach where we would prioritize flexibility, collaboration, and responsiveness to change. This could result in faster adaptation to evolving requirements but might require a high level of communication and coordination among team members.
In the end, which one we pick depends on what the event is like, how much we’re unsure about it, and how well the team knows each way. Adjusting the method to match the situation and what the team can do is really important for doing well.
From the Volatility and uncertainty through the VUCA approaches. This approaches provides a smooth landing in the various projects and circumstances posed through them.
Considering the challenges and issues faced as a project manager working with MTD events company, I will start with the linear approach where we prepare in advance by definition of the project and then deployment , then moved to iterative approach when the project become unpredictable.
Implications of taking an iterative approach in setting up an event are: Flexibility event planning, improved risk management, enhanced stakeholders engagement, facilitate more effective resource allocation, enhanced team collaboration; encouraging cross functional teamwork and communication, enable the team to refine the event concept, content and experience leading to a higher quality event.
Implications of an agile approach;Increased adaptability, Improved collaboration, Enhanced customer satisfaction, Reduces risk and uncertainty, Increased efficiency and productivity, Encourages continuous learning and improvement.
If asked to advise the MTD events company, my advice would be: Foster a culture of collaboration,continuous improvement and adaptability,monitor progress and adjust course,leverage technology and tools, encourage team members to share knowledge, learn from failure and refine processes, encourage collaboration among team members with diverse skills set and expertise.
As a project manager collaborating with MTD
Combining Linear and Iterative Project have many advantages including
* Increasing accountability
* Increasing visibility and transparency
* Providing assurance to sponsors and stakeholders
* Improving stakeholders engagement
* Accelerating delivery of project output.
Benefit of Agile Approach
Agile help to discover best features to use on the website
It gives daily information, transparency and speed in detailed specifications.
Characteristics of Agile Approach
Feedback from users and stakeholders
Build right solutions to right people
Linear Project Cycle
It’s important that project have a controlled start, middle and end. The structured project lifecycle plays a significant part in making this happen. The lifecycle is a management tool that determines how resources are allocated and the activity of the project team.
A typical linear Project lifecycle may look like this:
Concept
Definition
Deployment
Transition
The linear approach is an efficient way to deliver project in a stable environment when you;
Have good information about the required outputs
Can be sure you understand what users and stakeholders need and want
Have expertise in the domain
Iterative project do not begin with detailed specifications, project plans and schedule; they may start with just an idea, hypothesis or vision. A single iteration involves specifying, designing, coding and testing all at once.
If I were a project manager using MTD, I would combine the two approaches because there are factors that are needed to execute an event, such as finance, which may not always be available due to fluctuating prices in the market. Therefore, it is important to plan ahead and regularly review these plans to make sure that any given project is carried out effectively, quickly, and affordably, which will benefit all parties involved.
OR
An iterative approach typically takes longer, demands a high degree of commitment, and calls for fast strategy changes and job prioritization. Occasionally, it may be necessary to postpone certain project components in order to focus on those that are most crucial and will provide the greatest results.
On large projects, the capacity to recognize and act upon changes promptly is essential and has the power to make or break the project.
Depending on what’s most urgent at the moment, I would suggest combining several techniques to MTD.
If I were a project manager with MTD, I would use a mixture of both approaches because factors required for executing an event eg finance could be insufficient as prices vary from time to time in a volatile economy and so it is necessary to plan as well as review such plans as often as possible to ensure that any given project is executed efficiently in the shortest possible time at the least possible cost, which will be a win-win situation for the project manager and the various stakeholders involved.
It’s obvious project manager face quiet alot of challenges and I’ve learnt you can approach those challenges either in the linear or iterative method.
However, iterative approach also known as agile will help team get feedback each time to make sure that the team are building the right solutions for the right people. Iterative approach will help to focus on what is the main priority and this would hasten the work of an organization. This approach definition have alot of implications positively when used in an organization, however if a member of an organization is not up to the task or lazy, this approach might not be helpful because the project won’t progress as it ought to.
In otherwords, any method can be used to approach a project in an organizer. However, approaching a project in an iterative method gives speed delivery and at the end gives perfect project done which will definitely earn the support of sponsors and even their trust.
An iterative approach usually takes more time and requires a high level of dedication and ability to change strategy quickly and prioritize tasks. Sometimes some aspects of the projects may have to be put on hold to attend to what’s most important and would bring the most yield.
The ability to perceive and respond quickly to changes is critical on big projects and can make or mar the project.
I would recommend a blend of different approaches to MTD depending on what’s most pressing at the particular time.
As a project manager working with MTD events I recommend iterative approach because of its flexibility adaptability to new information also changing needs that arises during planning proces .
I’ve learned about the challenges project managers face this week, and I plan to address them by using negotiation, collaboration, and communication skills to resolve any issues that arise. This means keeping stakeholders informed about meetings, gathering everyone’s input and ideas, and working together to determine the best way forward.
One thing I’ve realized is that using an iterative approach can have implications. When focusing solely on delivering a project that’s already fully planned, there’s a risk of encountering unforeseen obstacles without a backup plan in place. This highlights the importance of having alternative strategies ready in case the initial plan doesn’t go as expected.
On the other hand, the agile approach, which aims to improve how software projects are managed by exceeding cost and schedule expectations, doesn’t necessarily lead to project failure. However, considering the ambiguity and complexity involved in managing the MTD event, I believe starting with a linear approach makes sense. This involves thorough preparation and definition upfront, with the option to switch to an iterative approach if the project becomes unpredictable and feedback is needed to make informed decisions.
The implications of choosing an iterative approach include potential changes in business strategy and project scope, the need for feedback to validate ideas and guide investment decisions, prioritizing speed of delivery over product completeness, and emphasizing completed work over project plans and reports. In conclusion, I recommend adopting a clear planning and execution pattern, such as the linear approach, to ensure successful project outcomes.
As a project manager for MTD, Communication is key and also for Iterative process, it gives room for communication, this way the customer is being carried along on all steps to be taken and their positive response(feedback) will make one know what step to take. This way, one can pause at Sprint to take a look at how far the event is going.
With what I have learnt this week about the challenges project managers face, I will deploy the method of negotiation, collaboration, and communication skills to help resolve any issue.
By applying all the methods of informing stakeholders for meetings, getting everyone’s suggestions and opinions, and finalizing the way forward.
Secondly, using an iterative approach can cause implications.
Because, anything can happen in the process of focusing on delivery an already full-planned project without having a standby alternative, in case the plan in place doesn’t go well to the end of the project.
Again, the agile approach has no implications because it aims at creating a better way of managing software projects that exceed their cost and schedules before the end of projects, thereby causing the projects to a failure.
Lastly, my advice to the company is to always adopt a more clear pattern of planning and executing a project, like the linear approach.
The Consequences using Iterative approach in an Event Project:
Iterative process is a trial-and -error method. Because team members will create, test, and revise iterations until they get to a satisfying solution, the iterative timeline isn’t clearly defined.
Even though, iterative model is extremely beneficial, there are few drawbacks and disadvantages attached to it, such as, each phase of an iteration is rigid with no overlaps. Also, system architecture or design issues may arise because not all requirements are gathered in the beginning of the entire life cycle.
Agile Approach Implications:
Agile method is base on flexibility transparency, quality, and continuous improvement and evolutionary nature. It lead to
– Superior quality to final product
– Customer satisfaction
– Better control
– Improved project predictability
– Reduced risks
– Continuous improvement
Taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project can have several implications, both positive and negative, However, it’s essential to carefully manage the process to ensure success. This includes effective communication, collaboration, and monitoring of progress throughout each iteration.
– Flexibility: Iterative methods allow for flexibility and adaptability throughout the event planning process. You can adjust plans based on feedback, changing circumstances, or new requirements.
– Continuous Improvement: Each iteration provides an opportunity to learn from previous stages and make improvements. This can lead to a more refined event plan and execution.
– Early Feedback: By breaking the project into smaller iterations, you can gather feedback early on from stakeholders, team members, or even potential attendees. This can help identify issues or areas for improvement before they become significant problems.
Risk Management: Iterative approaches can help manage risks by addressing potential issues early and continuously monitoring progress. This can reduce the likelihood of unexpected problems derailing the event.
– Increased Collaboration: Iterative methods often involve regular collaboration and communication among team members. This can foster a sense of ownership and engagement, leading to a more cohesive and effective team.
– Resource Management: Iterative approaches may require more frequent allocation of resources, both in terms of time and budget. It’s essential to manage resources effectively to ensure that each iteration is successful without overspending or burning out team members.
– Time Management: While iterative approaches can lead to more efficient planning and execution in the long run, they may require more time upfront to iterate and refine plans. It’s crucial to balance the need for thoroughness with the need to meet deadlines.
– Scope Creep: Without proper management, iterative approaches can lead to scope creep, where the project gradually expands beyond its original scope. It’s essential to set clear boundaries for each iteration and prioritize tasks to prevent scope creep.
Implementing an agile approach to event planning can bring several implications and benefits:
– Adaptability: Agile methodologies prioritize adaptability to changing circumstances, allowing for adjustments to plans and strategies as needed throughout the event planning process.
– Customer Focus: Agile methods emphasize understanding and meeting customer needs, which can lead to a more customer-centric event experience and higher satisfaction among attendees.
– Collaboration: Agile encourages collaboration among team members, stakeholders, and even customers, fostering a sense of ownership and teamwork that can lead to more innovative and successful events.
– Continuous Improvement: Through iterative cycles of planning, execution, and review, agile methodologies promote continuous improvement, ensuring that each event is better than the last.
– Risk Management: Agile approaches often involve identifying and addressing risks early in the process, minimizing the likelihood of unexpected issues derailing the event.
– Efficiency: By breaking the event planning process into smaller, manageable tasks, agile methodologies can lead to more efficient use of time and resources.
– Transparency: Agile methods typically promote transparency and open communication, ensuring that all stakeholders are informed and involved throughout the planning process.
If asked to advise a company on implementing an agile approach to event planning, I would offer the following advice:
– Educate and Train: Ensure that all team members understand the principles and practices of agile methodologies and provide training as needed to familiarize them with agile tools and techniques.
– Start Small: Begin by implementing agile methods on a small scale, such as for a single event or project, before expanding to larger initiatives. This allows the team to gain experience and identify what works best for their specific context.
– Empower the Team: Encourage autonomy and empowerment among team members, allowing them to make decisions and take ownership of their work within the agile framework.
– Establish Clear Goals and Metrics: Define clear goals and key performance indicators (KPIs) for each event and iteration, ensuring that everyone understands what success looks like and how progress will be measured.
– Embrace Feedback: Foster a culture of feedback and continuous improvement, encouraging team members to provide input and suggestions for how processes can be optimized.
– Adapt and Iterate: Be willing to adapt and iterate on the agile approach based on feedback and lessons learned from each event. Flexibility and openness to change are essential aspects of agile methodologies.
– Monitor and Evaluate: Regularly monitor progress against goals and KPIs, and evaluate the effectiveness of the agile approach to event planning. Use this feedback to make adjustments and improvements as needed.
As a project manager for MTD, an events company, the insights gained this week suggest that flexibility and adaptability are crucial in addressing the challenges and issues faced. Employing an iterative approach would allow for gradual refinement of the event, with the ability to incorporate feedback and make adjustments after each phase. This could lead to a more polished and successful event. The agile approach, with its focus on rapid adaptation, stakeholder collaboration, and incremental delivery, would enable MTD to respond swiftly to any changes or new requirements. My recommendation would be to integrate both approaches: use iterative planning for the overall structure and agile methods for areas requiring quick decision-making and flexibility, ensuring a comprehensive and responsive project management strategy.
The iterative approach as project manager for MTD will offers numerous benefits, primarily allowing for continuous improvement and adaptability throughout the project’s lifecycle. By dividing the project into smaller cycles or iterations, it will allow teams to deliver functional components incrementally, gathering feedback and making adjustments along the way. This approach encourages a collaborative environment where stakeholders can provide input at various stages, leading to better alignment with user needs and expectations. It will also reduce risks by allowing teams to address issues as they arise, rather than facing them all at the end. Ultimately, the iterative approach leads to more flexible and efficient project management, resulting in higher quality outcomes and increased customer satisfaction.
As a Project for MTD, I will utilize the iterative Approach because it allows for flexibility, there is room for feedback from clients, end-users during the course of working on the project. Projects will be done in sprints and at the end of each sprint, we will analyze and measure our progress to be sure that we integrate new changes if need arises. Iterative method is important because it allows you step back and analyze the project, each step of the way and stakeholders are involved in the process. While this Approach is good, it is time consuming, and it increases the cost of running this project.
Utilizing a Hybrid approach is also effective.
As a project manager working with MTD events I will highly recommend iterative approach because of the flexibility,it allows for the adaptability to new information and changing needs that arise during planning process
As the project manager for the MTD event, the implication of taking an iterative approach is that an iterative approach is a 2-weeks approach which would not be Anouilh for the kind of project the MTD organization is embacking on. The agile approach gives more room to carry out the project as one phase needs to be completed before another phase can commence as this is a huge project.
My advise to the company would be to use the ignite method in achieving the company’s goal.
In my own opinion, and as a project manager handling the MTD event, considering the ambiguity and complexity involved, I think I will start with the linear approach where we prepare in advance by definition and then deployments. In a case where the project began to become unpredictable, we then combine the iterative approach where feedbacks gotten can be used to decide whether a project is viable to carry.
Implications of taking an iterative approach are;
1)The environment business strategy and projects scope are likely to change.
2)Feedback from the environment (e.g users of customers) is needed to validate business ideas and inform investment decisions and planning.
3) speed of delivery is more important than product completeness.
4) completed work is more important to sponsors and the organization than project plans and reports.
As a project manager collaborating with MTD an event company. i think one should first start with iterative project since linear is just like skiin jumping,it is stable.Giving feed back and building the right solution and an agile approach will be used for big projects.
Event Planning could come with its own complexity and ambiguity, the case of MTD company would require the project manager to be pragmatic, the event could start as a linear project but the manager should be quick to introduce iterative processes where it is considered necessary towards ensuring that the required feedback is received timely and the success of the event is delivered as scheduled.
In my own opinion and from my understanding in the module, Both linear and iterative approach have it high point and non could be said to be better. it all depends on the kind of projects. some project may require you to use either of the approach. However, iterative is more iteractive and give a sense of relief on the success level of the project at a every giving point
In my own opinion I believe every company should at first utilize the iterative approach because user feedback should never be underestimated. After a few testing months corrections can be made and a clear vision can be created, but still regular feedbacks should be collected to see how well they are satisfying their users.
An agile approach will be used when big programs come up and I advice it be used occasionally so that it’s not new to the project team.
As the project manager for the MTD event, I can tell you that there could be a number of benefits from using an iterative method to plan the event, such as increased stakeholder engagement, flexibility, and ongoing development. MTD can react swiftly to shifting demands or market circumstances thanks to agile approaches, which lowers the possibility of delays or interruptions.
focus on delivering value incrementally. MTD could use techniques like Scrum to organize their work and prioritize tasks effectively.
Obvious Implications:
Increased Client Satisfaction: By involving clients throughout the project and delivering incremental value, MTD can ensure that the final event meets or exceeds their expectations.
Faster Response to Changes: Agile methodologies enable MTD to respond quickly to changing requirements or market conditions, reducing the risk of delays or disruptions.
Continuous Improvement: Through regular retrospectives and feedback loops, MTD can identify areas for improvement and make adjustments accordingly.
Consequently, based on the challenges and opportunities presented, my advice to MTD would be to adopt a hybrid approach that combines elements of iterative and agile methodologies
Event Planning could come with its own complexity and ambiguity, the case of MTD company would require the project manager to be pragmatic, the event could start as a linear project but the manager should be quick to introduce iterative processes where it is considered necessary towards ensuring that the required feedback is received timely and the success of the event is delivered as scheduled.
The challenges as a pm in MTD IS Wrapped around complexity and ambiguity of projects.
I will advice we use both the iterative and the agile approaches to resolve challenges.
As a project manager working with MTD event, if the company dough my idea on which approach method to use I will recommend the iterative method because it gives rooms for flexibility, continuous feedback and can accommodate changes in requirements or scope without significant disruption
Agile method on the other hand will be beneficial but has some major disadvantage which can put the project at risk of overlooking feedbacks as this method is a continuous one which can only be review in transition Phase. Also it can cause potential delay.
In this instance iterative approach it better in terms of flexibility so therefore planning an event would be a easy task because iterative approach accommodate change, so it will make it easy to fix and refix process
Iterative will always be better than linear aside the cost. When you prepare to kill a lion, antelope becomes a workover, when you prepare to kill an antelope, lion becomes a huge task.
Iterative creates the flexibility to expand, grow and multi task.
Taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project allows for continuous improvement and adaptation throughout the planning process. It enables organizers to gather feedback early on and make adjustments as needed, leading to a more refined final product. However, it may require more flexibility and open communication among team members.
On the other hand, adopting an agile approach involves breaking the project into smaller, manageable tasks or sprints, allowing for frequent reassessment and adaptation. This approach fosters collaboration, prioritization, and quicker responses to changes or challenges.
As a project manager for MTD event, if an iterative approach were employed in organizing MTD’s event, some of the consequences could include, flexibility, continuous improvement, enhanced stakeholder engagement, and risk mitigation. Using an agile approach for this project could bring about iterative delivery, cross-functional collaboration, adaptability to change, and focus on customer value.
As a project manager I will play the lead role in planning, executing, monitoring, controlling, and closing projects. I will ensure I deliver a project on time, within the budget, and brief while keeping everyone in the know and happy.” I will also ensure good communication with the team members and the client.
As a project manager working with MTD, I believe that iterative approach is a great fit for event projects like MTD. It allows for continuous improvement through cycles of planning, execution, and evaluation. This helps project managers optimize time, minimize resource waste, and address challenges quickly with agile teams. They can also gather valuable feedback from stakeholders throughout the process.
As a project manager of mtd company .i will check all project outlined the time frame each project should be executed and finding a possible solution to the challenges by introducing iterative approach by separating the events processes one after another
the budget
the venue
man power
logistics
etc. agile method can also be introduced by getting feedback from clients during or after an event. I will also advice that pragmatism should be implemented in any event because will help in showing how realistic the firm stand for.
As a project manager working with MTD, certain challenges and difficulties might arise when working on projects. These difficulties include, but are not limited to, tight deadlines, financial constraints, a restricted budget, evolving clients’, and uncertainty at event venues.
Implications of an Iterative Approach: Embracing an iterative approach to organizing an event as a project involves incremental planning and execution, with each phase being revisited and refined as necessary. Key implications include:
Flexibility: Iterative methods enable adjustments based on feedback and changing requirements, allowing for the accommodation of unforeseen challenges or opportunities.
Enhanced Adaptability: The team can adapt to evolving circumstances by progressively refining elements of the event rather than rigidly adhering to a predefined plan.
Continuous Improvement: Breaking the project into smaller, manageable iterations, organizations will help me focus on incremental improvements over time. Each iteration provides an opportunity to learn from past experiences, identify areas for enhancement, and make adjustments accordingly.
Implications of an Agile Approach:
An Agile approach, commonly associated with software development but adaptable to various projects, prioritizes collaboration, adaptability, and customer satisfaction. When applied to event setup:
Continuous Collaboration: Agile principles promote ongoing communication and collaboration among team members, creating a dynamic and responsive work environment.
For event management, a hybrid approach incorporating elements of both iterative and Agile methodologies could be advantageous:
Hybrid Approach: Blend an iterative model for detailed planning phases with Agile principles during execution, allowing for thorough groundwork while maintaining adaptability.
Frequent Stakeholder Involvement: Engage stakeholders regularly to gather feedback and insights, ensuring that the event aligns with their expectations and can be adjusted as needed.
As a project manager working with MTD, an event firm, there are several challenges and issues that may arise in their projects, including tight deadlines, changing client requirements, budget constraints, and coordination among various stakeholders. I have learnt about the benefits of iterative/agile and linear/waterfall approaches in project management that could greatly assist MTD in addressing these challenges.
Iterative Approach: An iterative approach involves breaking down the project into smaller, manageable phases or iterations. Each iteration involves planning, executing, and evaluating specific aspects of the project. This approach allows for flexibility and adaptation to changes as the project progresses. In the case of MTD, adopting an iterative approach to setting up an event would mean breaking down the event planning process into smaller phases, such as venue selection, vendor coordination, marketing, logistics, amongst several others.
Implications: There is a better adaptability. MTD can adapt to changing client preferences or unforeseen circumstances more effectively since each iteration provides an opportunity to review and adjust plans.
By continuously refining their approach in each iteration, MTD can enhance the quality of their events and processes over time.
Also, this helps to enhance stakeholders collaboration, i.e involving stakeholders in each iteration ensures that their feedback is incorporated early, leading to a more satisfactory end result.
On the other hand, Agile approach/methodology emphasizes on collaboration, customer feedback, and iterative development. It promotes adaptive planning and encourages teams to respond to changes quickly.
In other words, applying Agile principles to event management would involve close collaboration with clients, regular reviews of progress, and a focus on delivering value incrementally. MTD could use techniques like Scrum to organize their work and prioritize tasks effectively.
Obvious Implications:
Increased Client Satisfaction: By involving clients throughout the project and delivering incremental value, MTD can ensure that the final event meets or exceeds their expectations.
Faster Response to Changes: Agile methodologies enable MTD to respond quickly to changing requirements or market conditions, reducing the risk of delays or disruptions.
Continuous Improvement: Through regular retrospectives and feedback loops, MTD can identify areas for improvement and make adjustments accordingly.
Consequently, based on the challenges and opportunities presented, my advice to MTD would be to adopt a hybrid approach that combines elements of iterative and agile methodologies.
As a project manager working with MTD, the events firm, you must take into account the difficulties MTD faces when working on projects. These difficulties include, but are not limited to, tight deadlines, a restricted budget, clients’ needs that are always changing, and uncertainty at event venues. In order to guarantee client satisfaction at the conclusion of the project, I would encourage MTD to adopt flexibility, adaptability, openness, and open communication in its approach.
When arranging an event, it is best to use an iterative or agile strategy since this allows for greater flexibility and adaptability as the team’s outputs may be improved with input from each iteration. The option to get updates on the project’s status and provide feedback that continuously improves it will be provided to the stakeholders. This In the end, this will result in higher stakeholder and client satisfaction.
As a project manager working with MTD, the events firm, you must take into account the difficulties MTD faces when working on projects. These difficulties include, but are not limited to, tight deadlines, a restricted budget, clients’ needs that are always changing, and uncertainty at event venues. In order to guarantee client satisfaction at the conclusion of the project, I would encourage MTD to adopt flexibility, adaptability, openness, and open communication in its approach.
When arranging an event, it is best to use an iterative or agile strategy since this allows for greater flexibility and adaptability as the team’s outputs may be improved with input from each iteration. The option to get updates on the project’s status and provide feedback that continuously improves it will be provided to the stakeholders. This In the end, this will result in higher stakeholder and client satisfaction.
As a project manager working for MTD, I will recommend Iterative approach because of flexibility, it allows for the adaptability to new information or changing needs that arise during the planning process.
This approach also enables ongoing adjustments based on feedback and progress, potentially leading to a more polished final event.
There’s also the factor of reduced risk as it catches and addresses potential issues early and iteratively through regular evaluation cycles.
This will lead to the overall success of the events.
As a project manager collaborating with MTD, an events company, numerous challenges and complexities are inherent to projects. These include stringent deadlines, evolving client demands, financial constraints, and the intricate coordination among stakeholders. However, recent insights have shed light on the advantages of embracing iterative and agile methodologies in project management, which could significantly alleviate these hurdles.
Applying an iterative approach for event planning entails breaking down the process into distinct phases as scrum, to enhanced adaptability, responding promptly to evolving client preferences or unforeseen circumstances as each iteration facilitates review and adjustment, elevate the quality of events progressively and improved stakeholder engagement for more satisfactory outcome.
As a project manager working with MTD, an events company, there are several challenges and issues that may arise in their projects, including tight deadlines, changing client requirements, budget constraints, and coordination among various stakeholders. This week, I’ve learned about the benefits of iterative and agile approaches in project management that could greatly assist MTD in addressing these challenges.
Iterative Approach: An iterative approach involves breaking down the project into smaller, manageable phases or iterations. Each iteration involves planning, executing, and evaluating specific aspects of the project. This approach allows for flexibility and adaptation to changes as the project progresses. For MTD, adopting an iterative approach to setting up an event would mean breaking down the event planning process into smaller phases, such as venue selection, vendor coordination, marketing, logistics, etc.
Implications: Better Adaptability: MTD can adapt to changing client preferences or unforeseen circumstances more effectively since each iteration provides an opportunity to review and adjust plans.
Incremental Improvement: By continuously refining their approach in each iteration, MTD can enhance the quality of their events and processes over time.
Enhanced Stakeholder Collaboration: Involving stakeholders in each iteration ensures that their feedback is incorporated early on, leading to a more satisfactory end result.
Agile Approach: Agile methodology emphasizes collaboration, customer feedback, and iterative development. It promotes adaptive planning and encourages teams to respond to changes quickly. Applying agile principles to event management would involve close collaboration with clients, regular reviews of progress, and a focus on delivering value incrementally. MTD could use techniques like Scrum or Kanban to organize their work and prioritize tasks effectively.
Implications:
Increased Client Satisfaction: By involving clients throughout the project and delivering incremental value, MTD can ensure that the final event meets or exceeds their expectations.
Faster Response to Changes: Agile methodologies enable MTD to respond quickly to changing requirements or market conditions, reducing the risk of delays or disruptions.
Continuous Improvement: Through regular retrospectives and feedback loops, MTD can identify areas for improvement and make adjustments accordingly.
Advice for MTD: Based on the challenges and opportunities presented, my advice to MTD would be to adopt a hybrid approach that combines elements of both iterative and agile methodologies.
As a project manager collaborating with MTD, the events company, considering the challenges MTD encounters in their projects- limited budget, tight deadlines, constantly changing clients demands, uncertainties at event locations to mention a few. Based on what i have learned I would advise MTD to embrace flexibility, adaptability, transparency and open communication in its approach to ensure their client satisfaction at the end of the project.
If an Iterative/agile approach were employed, which i recommend in organising an event it gives room for flexibility and adaptability because feedbacks form each iteration can help in improving the outputs by the team. The stakeholders will have an opportunity to be briefed on the progress of the project and give feedback that continuously adds to the enhancement. this will ultimately lead to improved client/stakeholders satisfaction.
As a project manager working in MTD the events company, based on the nature of the organization there are plethora of challenges ranging from limited time, budget cuts, resource persons, inadequate space and overcrowding, clash of dates and venues, more than one consecutive events running in a short time frame, etc. Its is pertinent to note that whilst the iterative approach is best to use because of its advantages in getting things done quickly, keeping the customer satisfied and the process transparent, a linear process being combined with this will help also. This combination lets you get the short-term goals checked quickly while keeping you focused on the long-term achievement. The end of each iteration serves as a milestone for the linear process.
The agile method here serves up its full advantages while the project manager keeping tabs on his linear process helps them transition quickly into the next step to achieving their long term goals.
Based on the problems faced by MTD in projects, some insights I have gained this week that could offer assistance are ;
1. Control communication: MTD should focus on maintaining a communication widely with a range of stakeholders .To be on top of what is happening in the project itself and also communicating the right information at the right time, as it is required(timely communication)
2. Proper planning is important, MTD should prioritize thorough project planning, including creating a detailed project scope, setting realistic timelines for the project and milestones.
Adopting an agile approach can bring significant benefits to MTD because
the agile approach promotes flexibility, collaboration, and incremental delivery however By breaking down the project into smaller iterations, MTD can quickly adapt to changing requirements and address issues before they escalate.
If an iterative approach were employed in organizing an event as a project, the consequences would include:
1. Continuous improvement: Iterative planning and execution allow for continuous learning and improvement throughout the event. Feedback from each iteration can be incorporated into subsequent iterations, resulting in a better final outcome.
2. Flexibility: An iterative approach allows for flexibility in adapting to evolving event requirements, stakeholder feedback, and unforeseen challenges. Changes can be implemented incrementally, reducing the risk of major setbacks or disruptions.
3. Enhanced stakeholder satisfaction: By involving stakeholders in each iteration, their needs and preferences can be better understood and incorporated into the event’s design. This approach increases the likelihood of achieving higher stakeholder satisfaction.
Adopting an agile approach for event organization could have the following implications:
1. Increased collaboration: Agile methodologies promotes flexibility and collaboration.
2. Feedback : Agile encourages feedback on a regular bases and it will help MTD project team to quickly respond to changes in event requirements, trends, or changes in stakeholder demands that may arise during the project.
3. Promotes innovation: Agile provides the opportunity to experiment with new ideas and incorporate innovative features into the event.
If MTD sought my advice I would recommend the following:
1. MTD should Implement iterative and agile practices: the adoption of iterative and agile methodologies like Scrum will promote flexibility, collaboration, and continuous improvement, leading a more successful project .
Secondly, MTD should adopt effective communication practices and stakeholder involvement throughout the project and also encourage feedback and transparency in communication so as to avoid misunderstandings.
As a project manager working with MTD, the events company; looking at the multitudinous challenges and discrepancies confronting MTD, starting from stringent deadlines and evolving client demands to budget limitations and logistical intricacies, my suggestion for managing the projects would be to espouse an iterative methodology. This approach allows for adaptability, ongoing learning, and enhancements, fostering collaboration among the project team and stakeholders. However, the realization of project objectives as paramount concern for any project manager will be achieved.
Considering the myriad challenges confronting MTD, an event company—ranging from stringent deadlines and evolving client demands to budget limitations and logistical intricacies—my suggestion for managing their projects would be to embrace an iterative methodology. This approach allows for adaptability, ongoing learning, and enhancements, fostering collaboration among the project team and stakeholders. Ultimately, it ensures the realisation of project objectives, a paramount concern for any project manager.
As a project manager for an event planning company, the use of agile method is recommended, this brings flexibility, room for improvement and also customer inclusiveness.
As a project manager working with MTD, the events company, I understand that the events industry is dynamic and faces numerous challenges such as tight deadlines, evolving client expectations, budget constraints, and logistical complexities. This week, I’ve learned several strategies that could help MTD navigate these challenges more effectively.
One key approach that could benefit MTD is adopting an iterative project management methodology when setting up events. In an iterative approach, the project is broken down into smaller phases or iterations, allowing for incremental progress and continuous feedback loops. This can be particularly beneficial in the events industry due to its fast-paced nature and the need for quick adjustments based on client feedback and changing requirements.
Implications of an Iterative Approach:
1. Flexibility: MTD can quickly adapt to changing client needs and market trends throughout the project lifecycle.
2. Continuous improvement: Each iteration allows for lessons learned and improvements to be incorporated into subsequent phases, leading to higher-quality outcomes.
3. Client collaboration: Regular feedback loops with clients ensure alignment and satisfaction, reducing the risk of misunderstandings or misaligned expectations.
On the other hand, an Agile approach takes the iterative concept further by emphasizing collaboration, adaptability, and customer satisfaction. Agile methodologies like Scrum or Kanban promote cross-functional teams, frequent deliveries, and iterative planning.
Implications of an Agile Approach:
1. Collaborative teams: MTD can foster stronger collaboration between various teams such as event planners, designers, vendors, and clients, leading to better coordination and communication.
2. Adaptability: Agile methodologies encourage responding to change over following a rigid plan, which is crucial in the unpredictable events industry.
3. Customer focus: Continuous delivery and feedback loops ensure that MTD remains customer-centric, delivering value that meets or exceeds client expectations.
If asked to advise MTD, I would recommend a hybrid approach that combines the best elements of both iterative and Agile methodologies. This would involve breaking down projects into manageable iterations, embracing flexibility and collaboration, leveraging technology for efficient communication and project tracking, and prioritizing customer satisfaction throughout the event lifecycle.
Additionally, investing in training and development for teams to understand and adopt these methodologies effectively would be crucial. Continuous learning and improvement are key to staying competitive and successful in the ever-evolving events industry.
Since MTD is a big deal, iterative approach is better as it allows for flexibility, long-time frame while testing the waters with a foot.
It also gives room for modifications and re-modification of initial plans.
If an iterative approach were employed to set up an event as a project it’s would be encouraged since it’s allows for flexibility and adaptation as the event evolves. Since It involves breaking down the project into smaller, manageable tasks that can be completed in short cycles, allowing for continuous feedback and improvement.
Implications of an iterative approach:
1. Flexibility: Changes can be made throughout the process to accommodate evolving requirements or unexpected challenges.
2. Continuous improvement: Each iteration allows for lessons learned to be applied to subsequent iterations, resulting in a better final product.
3. Stakeholder involvement: Regular feedback loops ensure that stakeholders are engaged and their needs are addressed throughout the project.
On the other hand, an agile approach involves the principles of iterative development but is more focused on collaboration, customer feedback, and incremental delivery. It emphasizes adaptive planning, evolutionary development, early delivery, and continuous improvement, aiming to deliver value to the customer more quickly.
Implications of an agile approach:
1. Customer satisfaction: By delivering increments of value early and frequently, agile methods ensure that customer needs are met more effectively.
2. Adaptability: Agile methodologies enable teams to respond quickly to changes in requirements or market conditions.
3. Transparency: Agile frameworks promote transparency and open communication within the team and with stakeholders.
If I were to advise the company, I would recommend adopting an agile approach to setting up the event as a project. This would involve forming a cross-functional team, breaking down the project into smaller iterations or sprints, and regularly reviewing and adapting plans based on feedback from stakeholders and attendees. By embracing agility, the company can increase the likelihood of delivering a successful event that meets the needs of its target audience.
As a project manager for MTD, I will recommend Iterative approach because of flexibility, it allows for the adaptability to new information or changing needs that arise during the planning process.
This approach also enables ongoing adjustments based on feedback and progress, potentially leading to a more polished final event.
There’s also the factor of reduced risk as it catches and addresses potential issues early and iteratively through regular evaluation cycles.
This will lead to the overall success of the events.
As a program manager collaborating with MTD, I will be sure to apply the following insights:
1. Flexibility: Iterative project management allows for flexibility and adaptability throughout the event planning process. Instead of rigidly sticking to a predefined plan, I will adjust and refine my work approach based on feedback and evolving requirements.
2. Continuous Improvement: Breaking the project into smaller, manageable iterations, organizations will help me focus on incremental improvements over time. Each iteration provides an opportunity to learn from past experiences, identify areas for enhancement, and make adjustments accordingly.
3. Stakeholder Engagement: Iterative project management encourages active involvement from stakeholders throughout the planning process. Regular feedback loops enable me to share progress with stakeholders and they in return, are able to provide input, voice concerns, and contribute to decision-making, enhancing a sense of ownership and alignment with project goals.
4. Risk Mitigation: Addressing risks and challenges early and often is a core aspect of iterative project management. I will regularly assess project progress and identify potential obstacles to proactively mitigate risks and minimize their impact on event outcomes.
The advantages of this approach includes:
1. Adaptability: Applying the iterative approach allows for quick adjustments in response to changing requirements or unforeseen challenges, increasing the likelihood of project success in dynamic environments.
2. Stakeholder Satisfaction: Regular feedback loops ensure that stakeholder expectations are continuously managed and met, resulting in greater satisfaction with the final event deliverables.
3. Quality Focus: Iterative project management emphasizes continuous improvement and refinement, leading to higher-quality event outcomes as issues are addressed iteratively throughout the planning process.
The probable downsides of the approach include:
1. Increased Complexity: Managing multiple iterations concurrently can add complexity to the project management process, requiring careful coordination and communication among team members of MTD.
2. Time and Resource Intensive: Iterative project management may require additional time and resources compared to traditional linear approaches, particularly in terms of stakeholder engagement and iteration planning which may affect the success of events.
3. Uncertainty: The iterative approach may introduce uncertainty, especially if initial project requirements are not well-defined or if stakeholders have divergent expectations. This uncertainty can pose challenges in terms of managing scope and timelines effectively.
As a project manager collaborating with an event company, my primary responsibilities would include:
1-Project Planning: I would oversee the planning phase, ensuring that all aspects of the event, such as venue selection, budgeting, scheduling, and resource allocation, are carefully considered and documented.
2-Team Coordination: I’d work closely with the event company’s team, assigning tasks, setting deadlines, and fostering open communication to ensure everyone is aligned with the project’s goals and timelines.
3-Vendor Management: I’d liaise with vendors and suppliers to secure necessary services and equipment for the event, negotiating contracts and ensuring all deliverables meet quality standards.
4-Risk Management: Identifying potential risks and developing mitigation strategies to address any unforeseen challenges that may arise during the planning and execution phases.
5-Budget Control: Monitoring expenses throughout the project lifecycle to ensure adherence to the allocated budget, while also identifying opportunities for cost-saving measures where possible.
6-Quality Assurance: Upholding quality standards by regularly reviewing deliverables, addressing any discrepancies, and ensuring that the event meets or exceeds client expectations.
As the collaborating project manager If the company sought my advice, I would recommend adopting an agile approach to organizing the event as a project. Agile methodologies would provide the company with the flexibility, adaptability, and customer-centric focus needed to navigate the complexities and uncertainties inherent in event planning and execution. By embracing agile principles and practices, the company can improve collaboration, responsiveness, and ultimately, the success of their events.
As a project manager If the company sought my advice, I would recommend adopting an agile approach to organizing the event as a project. Agile methodologies would provide the company with the flexibility, adaptability, and customer-centric focus needed to navigate the complexities and uncertainties inherent in event planning and execution. By embracing agile principles and practices, the company can improve collaboration, responsiveness, and ultimately, the success of their events
Based on the difficulties and problems that MTD encounters in their projects, here are some insights I’ve gained this week that could offer assistance.
1-Improved Communication Channels: Strengthening communication channels between team members, clients, and vendors can help prevent misunderstandings and ensure everyone is on the same page throughout the project.
2-Proactive Risk Management: Identifying potential risks early on and developing proactive strategies to mitigate them can minimize the impact of unforeseen challenges on project timelines and budgets.
3-Enhanced Vendor Relationships: Building strong relationships with vendors and suppliers can lead to better outcomes, including preferential treatment, more competitive pricing, and increased reliability in delivering services and goods.
4-Streamlined Project Processes: Streamlining project management processes, such as task assignment, progress tracking, and decision-making workflows, can improve efficiency and reduce the likelihood of delays or bottlenecks.
5-Client Expectation Management: Setting realistic expectations with clients from the outset of the project, including deadlines, deliverables, and budget constraints, can help manage their expectations and avoid dissatisfaction later on.
6-Continuous Improvement Culture: Cultivating a culture of continuous improvement within the organization, where lessons learned from past projects are documented and used to inform future decisions and processes, can lead to greater efficiency and effectiveness over time.
If an iterative approach were employed in organizing an event as a project, consequences might include a more flexible timeline, potential for scope creep, and the ability to adapt as the event evolves. However, it could also lead to uncertainty regarding deadlines and deliverables.
On the other hand, adopting an agile approach could result in better collaboration among team members, faster decision-making, and the ability to respond quickly to changes or issues. However, it may require a more disciplined approach to planning and execution to ensure that deadlines are met.
If the company sought my advice, I would recommend considering the nature of the event, the team’s familiarity with iterative or agile methodologies, and the level of flexibility required. For complex and evolving events, an agile approach might be more suitable, while for more straightforward events with well-defined requirements, an iterative approach could suffice. Ultimately, it’s essential to tailor the approach to the specific needs and constraints of the event and the team involved.
A project team is a specific group of individuals that come together for the purpose of achieving a specific goal or objective within a defined timeframe. The team members are selected based on their skills, expertise, and experience relevant to the project’s requirements. The team is usually led by a project manager who is responsible for coordinating and managing the team’s activities.
A project team can differ from other teams in an organization in several ways:
1. Goal-oriented: Unlike other teams that may have ongoing responsibilities, a project team is formed specifically to achieve a particular objective or deliver a specific outcome within a defined timeframe. Once the project is completed, the team disbands or moves on to other projects.
2. Temporary: Project teams are temporary and are disbanded once the project is completed. In contrast, other teams may work together for longer durations, such as functional teams within departments.
3. Cross-functional: Project teams often consist of members from different functional areas or departments within an organization. This diversity allows for a broader range of skills and perspectives, ensuring a comprehensive approach to problem-solving and decision-making.
4. Project-based structure: Project teams typically operate under a project-based structure, where team members report to the project manager and work together towards achieving the project’s goals. In contrast, other teams may have hierarchical reporting structures within their respective departments.
As for exceptional and highly successful teams, several factors contribute to their greatness:
1. Clear goals and objectives: Great teams have a clear understanding of the project’s goals and objectives. This clarity helps align the team’s efforts towards a common purpose and creates a sense of direction.
2. Strong leadership: Exceptional teams are often led by competent and inspiring leaders who can guide and motivate the team members. Effective leadership fosters a positive work environment, promotes collaboration, and resolves conflicts efficiently.
3. Open communication: High-performing teams prioritize open and transparent communication. They encourage sharing ideas, concerns, and feedback, creating an environment of trust and respect. Clear communication helps in avoiding misunderstandings and enhances collaboration.
4. Diverse skill sets: A great team comprises individuals with diverse skill sets that complement each other. This diversity allows for a wider range of perspectives, innovative solutions, and efficient problem-solving.
5. Trust and mutual respect: Exceptional teams foster an environment of trust and mutual respect among team members. Trust enables effective collaboration, risk-taking, and delegation of tasks. Mutual respect ensures that everyone’s contributions are valued and appreciated.
6. Support and recognition: Great teams benefit from the support and recognition provided by both the project manager and the organization. Recognizing individual and team achievements boosts morale, motivates the team, and promotes a sense of pride and ownership.
7. Effective teamwork and collaboration: The ability to work together seamlessly, leveraging each team member’s strengths, is a hallmark of exceptional teams. Collaborative teamwork involves effective delegation, coordination, and cooperation, creating a harmonious work atmosphere.
8. Continuous learning and adaptation: Great teams understand the importance of continuous learning and adaptation to changing circumstances. They embrace new challenges, seek feedback, and learn from their experiences to continuously improve their performance.
Overall, exceptional teams are characterized by a combination of clear goals, effective leadership, open communication, diverse skill sets, trust, support, collaboration, and a commitment to continuous improvement.
Taking an iterative approach to setting up an event as a project would have several implications for MTD, the events company. An iterative approach involves breaking down the project into smaller, incremental phases and continuously improving based on feedback and lessons learned from each phase. Here are some potential implications of this approach:
1. Enhanced stakeholder engagement: By involving stakeholders in each iteration, MTD can gather feedback early on and incorporate changes, ensuring that the event aligns with their expectations and goals. This ensures higher stakeholder satisfaction and a successful event.
2. Flexibility to adapt: An iterative approach allows MTD to adapt and make adjustments throughout the project as needed. This is particularly crucial in the events industry where last-minute changes often occur due to unforeseen circumstances, such as weather conditions, sponsor demands, or attendee preferences.
3. Risk mitigation: Breaking down the project into smaller iterations allows MTD to identify and address risks early on. By testing different aspects of the event in each iteration, they can identify potential issues and develop mitigation strategies before they escalate and create larger problems.
4. Continuous improvement: The iterative approach promotes a culture of continuous improvement within MTD. With each iteration, the company can implement lessons learned from previous phases, resulting in better event planning, execution, and overall project management practices.
On the other hand, an agile approach to setting up an event as a project would have additional implications for MTD:
1. Increased collaboration: Agile methodologies emphasize collaboration and frequent communication among team members, stakeholders, and suppliers. This fosters a collaborative culture within MTD, leading to improved coordination, shared knowledge, and enhanced problem-solving capabilities.
2. Rapid response to change: Agile project management allows MTD to quickly adapt to changes in client requirements, market trends, or industry regulations. Events often require dynamic adjustments, such as modifying the event schedule, introducing new features, or accommodating emerging trends, and an agile approach enables MTD to respond effectively and efficiently.
3. Emphasis on customer satisfaction: Agile methodologies prioritize customer satisfaction by delivering frequent iterations of the event. This enables MTD to gather feedback early on and make adjustments, ensuring that the final event meets or exceeds client expectations.
If asked to advise MTD, my recommendation would be to adopt an iterative and agile approach in their event projects. This combination allows for maximum flexibility, early stakeholder involvement, risk mitigation, and continuous improvement. MTD can leverage the benefits of both approaches by breaking down the event into manageable iterations while adopting agile principles such as close collaboration, frequent communication, and rapid response to changes. By doing so, MTD can ensure successful events, satisfied stakeholders, and a competitive edge in the events industry.
As a project manager of a company, before start a project you need to know what its is all about. Iterative approach is recommended, it helps the PM set target and achieve it
As a project manager, linear and iterative approach is best to understand and deliver the project in time
As a project manager , i would prefer to adopt the linear and iterative approaches .iterative approach allows project manager to break down complex projects into manageable task and this help to improve the quality of products.
linear and iterative approaches will be deployed as a project manager. An iterative approach employs a break down of the project into smaller phases or iterations, each with its own set of goals and set targets to be achieved. This approach is flexibility, continuity and adaptability throughout the project.
I make use of linear and iterative approaches as a project manager. An iterative approach involves breaking down the project into smaller phases or iterations, each with its own set of goals and deliverables. This approach allows for flexibility, continuity and adaptability throughout the project. As a project manager advising a company on a project, I will find out what the project is all about, the goals and objectives, have a meeting with the sponsors, users, team members, and the stakeholders to know their expectation. I will then use both the linear and iterative approach. I will then identify problems and challenges by using the VUCA framework tool and also to develop a suitable response.
I will recommend Iterative Approach because of flexibility, it allows MTD to adapt to new information or changing needs that arise during the planning process.
This approach also enables ongoing adjustments based on feedback and progress, potentially leading to a more polished final event.
There’s also the factor of reduced Risk as it catches and addresses potential issues early and iteratively through regular evaluation cycles.
Introducing and embracing iteractive approach will help foster and collaborate with the VUCA laden and makes project management simple and well done
MTD is obviously working in a VUCA laden environment because events are constantly facing unexpected situations that need to be addressed to ensure it’s overall success. Though there is need for a linear approach as regards how events flow, there is need for the iterative approach when last minute challenges or activities are introduced hence altering the scope of work.
Consequences of this approach would result in faster responses to unexpected issues, release of short terms solutions to address immediate challenges while still working on the larger issues, flexibility to adapt to any increase in the scope of work.
The above suggestions will also be my advice to the company to adapt more agile approach.
Implications of an Iterative Approach: Embracing an iterative approach to organizing an event as a project involves incremental planning and execution, with each phase being revisited and refined as necessary. Key implications include:
Flexibility: Iterative methods enable adjustments based on feedback and changing requirements, allowing for the accommodation of unforeseen challenges or opportunities.
Enhanced Adaptability: The team can adapt to evolving circumstances by progressively refining elements of the event rather than rigidly adhering to a predefined plan.
Feedback Integration: Regular reviews facilitate the incorporation of stakeholder feedback, ensuring that the event closely aligns with expectations.
Implications of an Agile Approach:
An Agile approach, commonly associated with software development but adaptable to various projects, prioritizes collaboration, adaptability, and customer satisfaction. When applied to event setup:
Continuous Collaboration: Agile principles promote ongoing communication and collaboration among team members, creating a dynamic and responsive work environment.
For event management, a hybrid approach incorporating elements of both iterative and Agile methodologies could be advantageous:
a. Hybrid Approach: Blend an iterative model for detailed planning phases with Agile principles during execution, allowing for thorough groundwork while maintaining adaptability.
b. Frequent Stakeholder Involvement: Engage stakeholders regularly to gather feedback and insights, ensuring that the event aligns with their expectations and can be adjusted as needed.
c. Continuous Improvement: Embrace a mindset of continuous improvement, focusing not only on post-event evaluations of successes and failures but also on refining planning and execution processes for future events.
I think both iterative and agile approach is good. Both respond to the VUCA environment and provide possible solutions on how to respond to them. So for an event company, I say the environment matters as interactions are needed. And studying environment to bring out the best they can from a project to satisfy customer need, work within schedule and maximize available resources is necessary.
Iterative approach is more realistic to unstable environments. It doesn’t detailed information and is more concerned with speed of delivery and not the product completeness. It’s kind of innovative that the team will have to adapt and learn new skills just to keep up with the changes.
Using Agile approach will ensure response to uncertainty through continuous and dynamic planning, and provides better ways of managing projects costs, schedules to satisfy users’ needs.
I would advise the company to use both agile and iterative approaches
Considering the challenges faced by MTD, Both iterative and agile approaches will be advisable. The interactive approach will help to provide solution to the uncertainties with room for progress visibility while the agile approach will help with flexibility, customer satisfaction through feedbacks, improved quality and better risk management.
Adeyemi Adedokun
CH14 Team1
As a project manager collaborating/working with MTD and by looking at the challenges they faced during the course of their project, the best advice I can them was to work with iterative/agile approach.
As this will give the impression of working in sprints and getting the result and the review in every two to four weeks to know what next to do.
And the implication of this is that, the scope of this project is likely to change. Hence, we are having a scope creep as a result of expanding the project scope.
Though, the two methods are likely to be used depending on the complexity of the project work, meaning that we are working on Hybrid approach.
Oluwagbemi Elasoru
As a project manager collaborating with MTD, an event company. Adopting the iterative approach will mean that the event is likely to change and I will need to get feedback to validate the event ideas and take an informed decision and planning. As a PM, I can make use of the two to four weeks sprint for a mini review of the project. As a result of iterative approach, my teams are able to see the impact our work is having on customers as customers are expecting feedback. Also customer get good attention from my team.
The implications of adopting an agile approach is to perceive the change early and act at least as fast as the rate of change in the environment. As a PM, I am able to reprioritise task based on there value (to the customer and to MTD event company) and change direction quickly to enhance productivity.
I would recommend they adopt both iterative and agile approach as both approach are similar and the completed work is more important to sponsors and organizations.
I would recommend the use of both linear and iterative/agile approaches for organizing MTD’s events as it would work best.
As a PM working with MTD, using the iterative approach would allow for flexibility and adaptation to changing circumstances, requirements, and stakeholder feedback.
Both iterative and agile approaches offer benefits in terms of adaptability, stakeholder engagement, risk mitigation, and quality assurance. However, the decision should be based on factors such as the complexity of the event, the level of uncertainty, the availability of resources, and the organizational readiness for agile practices.
As a project manager considering an iterative approach is a good idea which can be applied depending on the project.
The challenges of iterative approach can be accept in unstable environment because it is more of a ‘skiing jumping’.
Iterative or agile projects allows us to test our (ideas, hypothesis or vision), and get feedback from users or the business. This feedback can then be used to decide whether a project is viable to carry out.
Iterative projects are better approach and choice when: The environment, business strategy and project scope are likely to change.
Speed of delivery is more important than product completeness.
The solution or product is novel or innovation and the project team needs to learn the skills to deliver it.
Iterative process involves creating, testing and revising until the end result is achieved. It involves trial and error, resulting in improvement over time. I would advise the MTD to implement this method as it would give the organization a clear vision and it would keep the team working towards same goals.
If an iterative approach were employed in organizing an event as a project, it would involve breaking down the event planning process into smaller, more manageable stages or iterations. Each iteration would focus on delivering specific components or aspects of the event, with opportunities for feedback and refinement between iterations. Consequences of this approach may include: increased adaptability, enhanced stakeholder engagement, reduced risk and improved quality.
On the other hand, adopting an agile approach would involve embracing the principles and practices of agile project management, such as iterative planning, continuous collaboration, and adaptability to change.
The Implications of adopting an agile approach for organizing an event may include: flexibility, cross-functional collaboration, increased delivery and continuous improvement.
If the company sought my advice on whether to adopt an iterative or agile approach for organizing an event, I would recommend considering the specific characteristics of the event, the organizational culture, and the preferences of stakeholders.
Both iterative and agile approaches offer benefits in terms of adaptability, stakeholder engagement, risk mitigation, and quality assurance. However, the decision should be based on factors such as the complexity of the event, the level of uncertainty, the availability of resources, and the organizational readiness for agile practices.
Thank you.
An iterative approach is good depending on the project, the challenge of iterative is that it is short termed and certain challenges can be encountered during the pathway but the beautiful thing is that it is easier to fall back and replan, it also gives way to identify loopholes present in planning such project, because any time there is feedbacks, the project team tends to have a clear insight and foresight that will help them in approaching the next line of action.
The iterative process is a method of building, refining, and improving a project, product, or initiative. It involves creating, testing, and revising until the end result is achieved. It is a fundamental part of lean methodologies and Agile project management, and can be implemented by any team. Iterative processes involve trial and error, resulting in improvements over time. Incremental design involves producing a bare-bones version of the final project deliverable, then iterating and improving upon it until it has all the necessary functionality. Most product development is iterative, with new versions of personal technology, mobile phones, speakers, refrigerators etc.
Agile teams often employ an iterative process for project work, continuously reviewing deliverables throughout the project’s lifecycle. I would advise MTD to successfully implement this method, have a clear vision, ask for early feedback, and encourage its’ company-wide. A clear vision helps keep the team working towards the same goal, while early feedback helps identify potential issues and reduces scope creep. Encouraging this approach can help reduce the chance of significant changes later on. Share the knowledge and implementation methods with teammates and upper management.
Using iterative method for managing project ,creates an unstable environment,but a linear method brings about balance and personally I feel the iterative approach is not cost effective,doing a particular project amd continuously vetting it ,helps to make it better but it doesn’t seem cost effective.A linear method helps it go from one step to another , gradually.
The challenge of an iterative approach in organizing an event is that it could lead to too many back and forth as well as getting into a project not fully prepared or not understanding the full scope and attendant challenges.
The implication of adopting an agile approach is that it enables the team quickly adapt and respond to issues and challenges that could arise in the course of the project.
My advise would be that a linear approach where a full planning and survey is done for the project is used at the beginning stage while also using iterative approaches to deal with each stage of the project as an agile method is employed.
using an iterative approach helps break down the workload and reduces stress on the team.
using scrum and scrum artifacts and creating backlogs and delivering a milestone every 4 weeks.
Using the iterative approach brings about unstable environment. But using the linear approach brings solutions, expected outputs and outcomes right from the start
Based on what we’ve learned in the course, I think a mix of both linear and iterative/agile approaches would work best for organizing MTD’s events.
For instance, in the beginning, when they’re figuring out what needs to be done and who’s involved (the conceptualization stage), a linear approach makes sense. But once they move into actually doing the work, using an agile method could help.
With agile, the project can be broken into smaller parts, and teams can work on these parts simultaneously in short bursts (sprints). This keeps things moving quickly and ensures the project stays on track, which is crucial for events that have a set deadline.
I have learnt that communication is very important as a project manager, that you should normalize getting feedback from clients
I also learnt that when handling a project you can use both the linear and the iterative methods as far as it leads to the success of the project
According to what has been thought, if I’m given the MTD project to handle, I’ll apply tye iterative method, as this will enable the team members always refer back to the plan in order to know if the project is going as planned because of the feedback that they tend to get from the end users.
This week, I’ve learned about the importance of adaptability and flexibility in project management, particularly in dynamic and unpredictable environments. As a project manager working with MTD, an events company facing challenges in their projects, I believe that adopting an iterative approach to setting up an event could be highly beneficial.
Implications of an Iterative Approach:
1. Continuous Improvement
2. Reduced Risk
3. Increased Stakeholder Engagement
4. Flexibility and Adaptability
Implications of an Agile Approach include but not limited to:
Responsive to Change, Cross-functional Collaboration, and Continuous Improvement
If I were asked to advise MTD on adopting an iterative or Agile approach to setting up events, my advice would be to:
– Conduct a thorough assessment of their current project management practices, team capabilities, and organizational culture to determine readiness for change.
– Educate and train their team members on iterative and Agile principles, methodologies, and best practices to ensure a shared understanding and commitment to the new approach.
If I were asked to advise MTD on adopting an iterative or agile approach to event management, my advice would be to carefully assess their organizational culture, project requirements, and client expectations. Both approaches offer benefits in terms of flexibility, adaptability, and continuous improvement, but the choice between them should align with MTD’s specific needs and capabilities. I would recommend conducting a pilot project or trial period to test the chosen approach and evaluate its effectiveness before fully adopting it across the organization. Additionally, investing in training and development for employees to familiarize them with iterative or agile methodologies would be crucial for successful implementation.
I believe the iterative method will be the best because we tend to stop at each track inorder to know if we are in the good position of the project. This is because of the feedback of the users that are testing the product of the project.
To improve communication and feedback from customers, an Agile and iterative approach should be implemented, with teams set up to oversee each stage of the delivery process.
-Victoria Okonkwo
Adoption of Iterative or Agile method helps in risk reduction by predicting and or exposing potential risks on time, enabling my Project team have adequate time to take preventive measures on time. The agile method will also allow my team apply the Scrum framework; using the SPRINT periods to analyze, communicate to the client/end users and receive their feedback which will help us adjust/improve our solutions at the end of each Sprint period(2-4weeks) while building towards delivering a ‘perfect’ final product.
In the case of working with MTD on an event project I would advice the use of Hybrid method because the Linear lifecycle will work very well at the beginning of an event which is usually a stable process(Conceptualization of the event; Definition of project).
I will recommend iterative method for MTD. This is because they implement in environments that are new to them and they will get feedback from project stakeholders at every accomplished stage for decision making.
When I consider the difficulties and problems that MTD encounters in their projects from what I have learnt about them in this course, I believe that a hybrid approach that would combine both the linear and the iterative/agile approach to Project Management might be the best approach to organizing their events.
I think this is the approach to adopt because an event is unlike the development of a software; in that the conceptualization stage is usually quite linear; the defining of what needs to be done and who the stakeholders might be. Switching to the agile method in implementation would however enable the project team break the entire project into component parts that would not depend on each other for execution.
Project teams can work simultaneously on the different aspects of the project in sprints, after the preliminary stages. This ensures that the project stays within the preferred timeline. This is particularly important as event have a time limit that needs to be protected.
The iterative approach will be more suitable in this case.
It allows the project manager to communicate better with the team.
A hybrid of linear and iterative approach (with focus on agile)would be ideal for the MTD Project.
This would present a wide range of methods and practices and an extensive toolkit for the project managers to apply when faced with the myriad challenges of projects in a complex world
The type of project management approach to adopt depends largely on the environment and working conditions. The implications of each project approach will have an impact on the outcome or results.
The Linear Approach is more suited to a stable environment and helps for improved collaboration and continuous improvement.
However, an Iterative Approach is better when the business strategy and project scope is likely to change as such feedback is required after every iteration. This requires a clear and clean communication between all the stakeholders.
To my understanding, I would advise for a Hybrid Approach to combine tools and techniques from both approaches in-order to create a flexible and adaptable project lifecycle.
MTD currently adopts a linear methodology for her operations, my advice to MTD would be that the combination of an Agile and iterative approach should be adopted to enhance more effective communication and a prompt feedback from customers. A set up silos of teams should be set up to probe each stage in the delivery channels.
Well, using an iterative approach is not bad but just the slowness and delay of projects. But for uncertainty and adaptability to changes in the project, it would be a good use eventually for MTD.
Using Agile approach provides a better way of managing projects cost and schedules much faster.
i will advice the MTD company to employ the use of both softwares for timely and effective delivery of projects.
I’d advise the hybrid method of approach by combining the linear and iterative method for successful project outputs.
I am of the sound opinion that the hybrid method combination of linear project circle or waterfall whose concept, definition, deployment and transition are certain and where activities are cascaded from one to the next stage; with the iterative project approach which has no control on the start ,middle and end if the project should be put into practice by PM for better collaborative delivery and a successful project’s implementation to the delight of the entire stakeholders
Using Iterative methods are rather helpful but at the same time a delay and cost effective to projects. In the case of MTD , the iterative method would have allowed for rapid change and improvement along the course of the project therefore saving money that would have been wasted at the end of the project cycle.An hybrid approach of both the iterative and the linear method would have been the best solution for this project. The implications of an agile approach is that it makes you keen and focused on completing the task.
Iterative approach is more suitable to unstable environments. It doesn’t have enough detailed information and is more concerned with speed of delivery and not the products completeness. It’s kind of innovative that the team will have to adapt and learn new skills just to keep up with the changes.
Using Agile approach will ensure response to uncertainty through continuous and dynamic planning, and provides better ways of managing projects costs, schedules to satisfy users’ needs.
I would advise the company to use a combination of appraoches for effective results.
As a Project Manager working with MTD, using the iterative approach would allow for flexibility and adaptation to changing circumstances, requirements, and stakeholder feedback. This can lead to a more responsive and ultimately successful event, as adjustments can be made throughout the planning process. It often involves regular communication and collaboration among team members and stakeholders. This fosters a sense of ownership and teamwork, leading to better decision-making and problem-solving.
If I used an agile approach in organizing an event I would use Agile methodologies, like Scrum , prioritizing and delivering value to the customer. This means focusing on attendee experience and satisfaction throughout the process.
If MTD sought my advice on which approach to adopt for organizing an event, I would recommend a hybrid approach that combines the best elements of both iterative and agile methodologies. This hybrid approach would leverage on the flexibility and adaptability of iterative processes while incorporating the customer-centricity and delivery focus of agile methodologies.