3 experts have described difficult decisions they had to take in one project.
Now think about what was important for them in taking the decision the took. Would they act differently in a different context? Why?
(If you are part of an ongoing PM bootcamp cohort on DEXA, also copy your comment to your group)
From this 3 experts in this video, I learnt that Different strokes for different projects, every project has its uniqueness even in challenges, keeping the objective of each project in mind sustains the success of a project, and it is necessary to evaluste all possible advantages and disadvantages during the planning process, Analyse potential challenges and proffer possible solutions risk assessment is necessary to be involved in our planning stage, to avert recurrence in the future take document lessons learnt to be put into consideration for subsequent projects.
Decision making and especially in between a project can be straining but Certain Decisions must be taken for the Benefit of Everyone involved.
Dealing with difficult decisions in project management requires a structured approach. Here’s a step-by-step guide:
_Step 1: Define the Problem_
1. Clearly articulate the issue
2. Gather relevant data and information
3. Identify stakeholders and their interests
_Step 2: Assess Options_
1. Generate potential solutions
2. Evaluate pros and cons of each option
3. Consider risks and opportunities
_Step 3: Evaluate Criteria_
1. Establish decision-making criteria (e.g., cost, time, quality)
2. Weight criteria based on project priorities
3. Assess options against criteria
_Step 4: Make a Decision_
1. Choose the best option
2. Consider seeking input from stakeholders or experts
3. Document decision rationale
_Step 5: Communicate and Implement_
1. Inform stakeholders of the decision
2. Develop an implementation plan
3. Monitor progress and adjust as needed
_Decision-Making Techniques:_
1. Cost-benefit analysis
2. Decision trees
3. Pareto analysis
4. Six Thinking Hats
5. SWOT analysis
I learnt from the 3 experts in the video that:
1) Evaluating all possible pros and cons of a project while creating a plan with your project team is very important.
2) Provide a possible solution /suggest way out of any risk or issues envisaged while planning.
3) There is always a lesson to learn from any difficult decision made to help strengthen your planing a future project.
Different stroke for different project. Having the goal of every project in minds can keep it going. Yes, we may get to the point where we have to compromise to accommodate and also for the good of the project but we should also be able to know when the project isn’t making any headway anymore and call it a stop.
Difficult? YES, but we have to do what we have to do for the benefits of everyone.
I believe they took important decisions that was necessary for the success of the project. Every decision they took was equally important to the success of the project.
As a project manager you are responsible for the project, so you’re accountable for its development.
The decision taken was for the best interest of the organisation ,and through effective communication with stakeholders issues were resolved.
they would’ve acted differently in the sense that different project has different approach.
It’s not all your engagement that you get to finish. Whenever, circumstances that are beyond the scope of your duties appears either as a result of inadequacies, forcemajor or lack of communications. And it defile known better solutions, the best thing would have been to let go of it not to further strain the bad relationship.
It’s not all your engagement that you get to finish. Whenever, circumstances that are beyond the scope of your duties appears either as a result of inadequacies, forcemajor or lack of communications. And it defile known better solutions, the best thing would have been to let go of it not to further strain the bad relationship.
As a communicator and a student of Project Management, I can say communication takes the lead in all ways. One of the ways the 3experts dealt with difficult decisions was through communication.
For you to terminate project, early or later, you need to communicate with people involved- clients and team.
For language differences, you need to find a way to speak everyone’s language to have Effective and efficient team and delivery.
For me, I would have done exactly what they all did to deal with difficult decisions. Proactiveness and communication takes the lead.
The most important lesson I picked is compromise it is not always a sad compromise sometimes it can be a happy compromise. I would say yes they would act differently in a different context this is because the problems varies and it requires different solutions.
Rather than dwelling on the challenges, the most important thing for the 3 of them was the goal of the project and it spurred them on to making considerable marks on their respective projects.
Communication and staying focused on the goal/project was clear for these Project Managers. They made an effort to bring together and maintain a good balance among all the parties involved in the project before making the hard decision.
These 3 project managers shared their scenario about having to make difficult decision. One key point i picked up was proper communication and deliberations before coming to the conclusion of such decision. Thereby appreciating all the team members and stakeholders outputs towards the project all these time.
These project managers all had difficult decisions to make, one talked about project terminations these happens when the organizations embark on a higher prioritized project and naturally the stakeholders conduct a meeting to contemplate the termination of the initial project, the second talked about a water related issue where both parties had to find a common ground and the third talked on language barrier but one similar thing between this project managers were compromise and addressing the people involved with humility.
The first expert spoke about early project termination. This happens as a result of when an organisation embarks on a higher project or technical issues. The company has no choice but to discontinue the project. It is one of the most difficult situations but the only way to achieve a higher project. The Project Manager would not have acted differently as this is the best way to achieve higher project. Stakehoders meeting normally holds to deliberate on termination or continuation
These three experts where faced with difficult decisions but one thing these PM had in common was they were able communicate their challenges, and their major aim was to look out what was best for the project they were and handling and everyone that was involved. Though the decisions were not easy but they look for a common ground.
These three experts where faced with difficult decisions but one thing these PM called was they were able communicate their challenges, and their major aim was to look out what was best for the project they were and handling and everyone that was involved. Though the wasn’t decisions were easy but they look for a common ground.
All three of them were faced with challenges but one key similarity was people speaking different languages, but I noticed they all came to a collaborative agreement, ego was set aside and a few compromise here and there and team efforts and at the end success was achieved. A project manager has to be open to considering lots of options while staying calm in a troubling situation.
Here the project manager has to see himself as team member open to ideas in involving all the party ,collaborating, sharing ideas, considering the prons and cons of opinions, etc before a decision which is in the best interest of the project is taken.
All three persons under review did the right thing by communicating and collaborating with all the players involved in the project, this bringing together all ideas each person has due to individual expertise and experiences.
what was important to them in those situations was collaboration, getting the parties involved in a round table to discuss the way forward, if the project was going to stop, to make sure everybody understood the reason for that and that they understood that the reason for stopping the project outweighs continuing the project. Basically, it is teamwork, communication, and collaboration.
As a project manager, one has to be prepared to make tough decisions at every point of time.
Our speakers from the video talked about how they were able to make tough decisions. One has to deal with ending a project before completion. In spite of the efforts that has invested by the team, Another has deal with water supply issue. And the third one because of the language barrier, he still made decisions.
Decisions making is part of project management. And when there’s necessity to make those tough call, one must manage how one will communicate with both the investors and the team.
One of the strengths a project manager must exhibit is decision-making and risk management. A project manager must be able to decide appropriate for the best of the project and the stakeholders not minding the risk involved. The key speakers in this video did very well by elaborating on their decision-making experience and why they arrived at such decisions. In effect, purpose determines and outweighs the decision. The outcome of every project is the result of decisions taken at some point in the life cycle of the project. Decisions affect the outcome. Decision-making is crucial to achieving the overall objectives of projects; time-saving and can be cost-effective thus a stitch in time saves nine. Some decisions could be tough and painful but for a project manager, such decisions are stepping stones to success.
Another takeaway is that decisions must not be stereotyped as no two projects are the same. Different projects present different sets of risks. As a project manager, it is important to understand that circumstances have a great role to play in decision-making. For example, recently I had to decide on a need to change our operational approach having foreseen the difficulty that may arise from market forecast. The decision was communicated to all stakeholders and it was approved. The decision eventually resulted in the completion of the project ahead of schedule and helped in keeping the project within budget. The key reason for the decision was to save the project from a 45% variation which could have affected the cost and the time of completion. The decision was timely and precise.
Ogoke Nwachukwu Felicia O COHORT 18
In every project there must be Risks or difficult moments, and it is at this point that the Project manager’s skills are rated. When difficulties arise in the course of a project, it is the duty of the PM to discuss the way out with the team members and the stakeholder to mitigate what it is in order to have a successful project result.
The most important object of concern is the “Team”.
The PM needed to communicate the actual situation to the members of the team in abid to arrive at a collective decision that will be acceptable by everyone especially where the outcome is not a pleasant one.
Project management is really about managing problems and as such one should expect that as the unspoken job description. A Project Managers success is not just in the ability to come up with brilliant ideas but in the ability to carry the project team and stakeholders along ultimately A’sing the project
One goal that every project manager have is being successful in each project. It happens that some project get terminated before completion or execution because there is glitch in communication. That’s why all details are meant to be payed attention to.
The major concern is that projects intentions are successfully implemented.
As a PM you have to not only put success of your projects in mind but always make the right decisions that will not ruin the projects at the end
communication
Their primary concern was that the project’s intended changes were successfully implemented. They might have acted differently in a more rigid organizational culture
As project manager you must be able to make decision at a go even if it tough you must be able to make decisions that will best suit the project at the time and explains to the concerned parties if need be
As a project manager, making some decisions may be somehow daunting sometimes, but making sure everyone is on the same page as you will always help the team to sort out things during this difficult time. All lessons learned should be documented for future projects.
Theresa Ogungbenro Cohort 18 team 7
As a project manager, prioritizing project success is key. You must make decisions that drive the project forward. Effective communication is also critical—especially when a project faces termination. Clearly explaining the reasons behind decisions and aligning the team is essential.
The project interest should come first but when the project manager is faced with difficult challenges then, he/she should be sure of been on the same page with the sponsor of the project
Suleiman Yunusa
Team 9
Decision making is not something easy but ensuring the project success is very important. As a PM you’ll have to put the success of the project first and make necessary decisions in time to make sure the project aims and objectives are met.
As a PM you need to be very good at communicating with all stakeholders and team members to enable you make necessary decisions at the right time so that when you have to terminate a project you will be able to make the decision early.
Decision making is not something easy but ensuring the project success is very important. As a PM you’ll have to put the success of the project first and make necessary decisions in time to make sure the project aims and objectives are met.
As a PM you need to be very good at communicating with all stakeholders and team members to enable you make necessary decisions at the right time so that when you have to terminate a project you will be able to make the decision early.
Sherifa Shoba, Cohort 18, team 9
Overall, ensuring the success of the project is crucial and knowing there are times where difficult decision will be made. Being able to handle that if it occurs but also taking note of the positive impacts of the project and new discoveries which can help in other projects.
Unexpected challenges that occur should be tackled immediately after concluded meetings with every persons involved by providing alternatives that can serve well for the purpose of fulfilling the goal of the project.
Overcoming personal barriers that can influence the way we communicate as a project manager in terms of language and cultural differences. Bridging the gap between them through proper research and personal advancement to meet up with the project goals and responsibilities as a project manager.
Alexandra cohort 18 team 7
The goal of a project manager should always be to see to the success of a project. But when presented with a difficult decision, maybe to terminate a project, a project manager should see that it aligns with the organization’s core values and goal, and also communicate with team members on why the decision was made.
Christopher Nkanta Cohort 18 Team 3
They all faced different challenges as Project Managers at a particular point, they had to look for a way to resolve the Ethics of the profession In making decisions. You deal with what is most important in the project or what will be the best for the project.
They would have acted differently in different scenarios because every project is unique and requires a unique approach. Every decision taken has its side of effect on the company and the PMs personality
Terminating a project before completion may result in sunk costs where the money, time, and resources already invested cannot be recovered. The project manager’s reputation may be affected depending on the reason for termination. If the project is terminated for valid reasons (e.g., misalignment with business objectives), the project manager may be seen as decisive and pragmatic. However, if poor planning or execution led to early termination, it could harm their professional standing.
On the other hand, Early termination may free up resources (budget, personnel, etc.) that can be redirected to more strategic or higher-priority initiatives. This can be a positive if the project no longer aligns with the organization’s goals.
To mitigate the adverse implications of terminating a project early, the project manager and organization need to adopt proactive and strategic measures such as clear communication with stakeholders on the reasons behind the termination, Offer support, and keep the team engaged and motivated for future success, etc.
A project manager should up his decision-making skills and ensure that it aligns with organizations goals and values
Communication is key when difficult decisions have to be made. The main goal is to ensure everyone is carried along and happy at the end. They may have taken another decision if the scenario was different. The bottomline is there is no size fits all for all projects. A project manager must find out what works and make decisions based on that.
Nkechi Izeji Chort 18 Team 6. For me, if I had no choice but t terminate a project, I will make sure everyone is carried along to seee reasonn so as not to feel wasted or used.
Like the lady manager said, I will make sure a particular knowledge is taken out of that project.
They may act differently in different contexts due to organizational values, industry-specific regulations and standards, project type, stakeholder dynamics and expectations, level of uncertainty and ambiguity, and other reasons. Project managers must consider the specific context and adapt their decision-making approach to ensure successful project outcomes.
Every situation would definitely have different pattern to solve it cause every Project manager come across different people which different techniques are needed to work with this people in order to achieve a goal. I will personally say every one acted accordingly due to their different client responses.
Exactly what’s said here’s that; In a situation that demands a difficult decision making, balances should be checked.
Working under someone could be draining, especially when being ordered. If you’re going to get to that point of making difficult decisions, then it shouldn’t be one that’ll strike the organization so hard and also cause you a query.
It is important that, as a project manager, we tackle different issues according to their peculiarities. Each of them faced the issues the way it applied, and they had to make difficult decisions to resolve what they were facing, though it might affect a particular thing, team, or department, but whatever decision a project manager is taking, the effect must be very minimal to the whole project.
they would act differently because the challenge will not be exactly thesame and, some has communication challenge and it was not same with the one that has to compromise to get the project done even it means working overtime so as to be able to meet up with the proposed deadline.
Reaching the outcome was important for them in taking the decision.
They would act differently in a different context because of the tasks to be undertaken to meet the project deadlines.
The three project managers handled the project based on what the present situation was,termination of project,clients not happy with previous project and needed to compromise a bit just to meet their target,communication issues,they are issues that just needed to be way,failures set in at some point in a project and it is a motivation to go back to the drawing board ,reanalyse and get it done by any means necessary in a legal way.That is another different context I feel they can use even if they are to act differently.
i think each handled their challenges based on the context or the situation they found themselves, and might require another approach if the situation was changed but what was important in all three approaches was that each kept the goals and objectives of the project foremost in mind and priority and also were able to harmonize the differing team members or stakeholders making sure that each is committed to the completion of the projects
Based on the scenarios/Experiences of the Project managers,they would not have acted differently as they all had the same pivotal focus. Ensuring that what was best for the project was executed and being able to reach a favourable compromise amongst the different stakeholders involved which in turn ensured the smooth running of the project.
The most important and similar the about the three of them is the fact that they all focus on the goal of the project by adapting and embracing challenges and finding solutions to them to see to the success of the project.
In the course of making these difficult decisions, one thing was peculiar to the three scenarios which is the drive and focus on the goal . They all aimed at getting resolutions, explored all available resources in making sure the problem was solved, although they were difficult decisions but in the end the decisions supported the goals of the project. Another thing that was important was communication; passing and receiving information in real time. Sourcing for feedbacks and making sure every stakeholder involved were well informed in the course of taking those decisions.
Judging all the scenarios, I do not think they would have done anything differently as all decision were made careful and based on the context of the situation at hand.
One of the experts had the issue of making a compromise in the course of executing the project. Compromises are sometimes necessary to achieve set goals of a project, and in such times it is important to maintain constant communication on the issues at hand with your team.
But what was important for all three expert is the drive to see their projects completed and leave their client satisfied
One of the experts had the challenges of language barrier and communication is a very important aspect of project management. it was important for him to take the decision he took in order to carryout a successful project. Communication helps to bring the team together and foster a positive relationship with one another. I don’t think he would have acted differently
ALISON UMELO
One common factor the three speakers displayed was to ensure that the goal of the project is met as planned, by exploring all options available to them in dealing with problems/challenges that might lead to early termination of project.
In another development, the speakers took a different approach in handling some difficult issues they face at different levels of the project. Some of these issues received adequate support from responsible stakeholder who are willing to accept responsibility, while in other situation the responsible stakeholder failed to meet up with their responsibility which eventually lead early project termination.
Furthermore, the three speakers recognized different races, genders involved in their project and hence, ensured their human rights are respected, valuing their opinions helped in reducing conflicts that has the potentials to disrupt the progress of the project.
ALISON UMELO
Cohort 17, Team 2
Peter Benedict
What was important for all of them was the fact that the three of them are focusing on the goal of the project instead of dwelling on the challenges and may end up terminating the project prematurely and they were able to take the challenges out of the way by doing what they have to, to achieve the desire goal at the end.
What was important for all three speakers is ensuring the goal of the project was met and the projects being executed successfully. They were able to achieve this goal by being adaptable in the sense of embracing new changes and challenging themselves to grow and adapt.
Being fast thinkers and having problem solving skills
Having good teamspirit and collaborating with other stakeholders
Having emotional intelligence and empathy, especially during situations where other team members had differences in opinions. They were able to listen and understand every members view, analyze and try to remind the team of the core values of the project and find possible solutions and way forward.
In a different context, they might’ve acted differently due to the differences in stakeholders influence and expectations, personal values, organizational culture, resource realignment
They endeavored to do one thing, which is to ensure that the goal of the project is met. They were empathetic, transparent, adaptable, critical thinking and restructuring to meet the time constraint.
In a different context, there would’ve been biases and a lot of personal adjustments would be employed to not deviate completely from the path of the project line especially where the Stakeholders have High Power- High Interest
EKEMINI EBONG
COHORT 17 TEAM 6
I reflect on the experts’ decision-making processes, I realise that they mainly focused on one goal, which is ensuring the successful execution of the projects. After the many problems they faced, the experts were able to navigate the complex project challenges by harnessing the power of:
1. Purposeful Alignment: Ensuring decisions resonated with the project’s core purpose and deliverables.
2. Empathetic Insight: Considering the human impact on stakeholders and adjusting course accordingly.
3. Resilience and Adaptability: Embracing changes, new experiences, and uncertainties with a growth mindset and adapting to new information.
4. Collaborative Synergy: Weaving together diverse perspectives, mapping out decisions with input from team members and experts. to create a myriad of solutions.
5. Values-Driven Integrity: Anchoring decisions in strong personal and professional moral values.
6. Data-Informed Curiosity: Exploring new frontiers with a curious mindset and evidence-based insights.
7. Transparency and Authenticity: Sharing decisions and rationales with vulnerability and trust.
8. Risk Management and Problem-Solving Skills: Analysing problems, identifying solutions, and mitigating risks.
9. Team Support and Empowerment: Foster a positive team culture, encourage ownership, and provide guidance.
10. Emotional Intelligence and Empathy: Understand team members’ perspectives, concerns, and motivations.
11. Realistic Expectations and Prioritization: Manage stakeholder expectations, prioritise tasks, and focus on high-impact activities.
In a different context, these experts might alter their approach due to:
Personal values and biases
Cultural and environmental context
Available information and data
Time constraints and pressure
Stakeholder influence and expectations
Risk tolerance and appetite
Emotional state and intuition
Team dynamics and collaboration
Shifts in organisational culture and policies
Economic and resource constraints
Technological advancements and innovations
Regulatory requirements and compliance
Unforeseen circumstances and surprises
Individual experiences and expertise
Power dynamics and authority
Resource Reallocation.
By recognizing and understanding these factors, project managers can adapt their decision-making approaches to different situations and contexts, leading to more informed decisions and successful project outcomes.
After listening to them all, what I realise is that they all want to achieve the same goal which is, making sure the project turns out successful. After facing all the difficulties, they were all able to find solutions to the problem.
What I observed from the three speakers was one main point: they each wanted their project to go on and to be concluded positively. So they each had a contingency plan, made compromises and collaborated with the people to achieve the desired result. Yes, they would have acted differently in a different context because they would have wanted to prove their points and carried out their own decisions, but as the Project Managers they are, they took good ethical decisions.
In my organisation and community the core values are Service, Fellowship, Diversity, Integrity and Leadership and these help me work effectively with others while executing a project
After listening to them all, what I realise is that they all want to achieve the same goal which is, making sure the project turns out successful. After facing all the difficulties, they were all able to find solutions to the problem.
Listening to the project managers in the video what i understood was that their main aim was to achieve their goals and give in a quality project.
The project manager would act differently on a different context because I believe every individual has a way of handling difficulty or challenges.
Reflecting on the experts’ decisions, we can identify key factors that influenced their choices:
1. *Project goals and objectives*: Aligning decisions with project outcomes and success criteria.
2. *Stakeholder expectations*: Managing stakeholder needs, concerns, and communication.
3. *Risk management*: Assessing and mitigating potential risks and impacts.
4. *Team dynamics and resources*: Considering team members’ skills, workload, and well-being.
5. *Contextual factors*: Taking into account the project’s unique environment, constraints, and opportunities.
6. *Ethical considerations*: Making decisions that respect ethical principles and professional standards.
7. *Long-term implications*: Weighing short-term needs against long-term consequences and benefits.
In a different context, the experts might act differently due to variations in:
1. *Project scope and complexity*
2. *Stakeholder priorities and expectations*
3. *Resource availability and constraints*
4. *Team composition and skills*
5. *Organizational culture and policies*
6. *External factors (market, regulatory, etc.)*
The experts’ ability to adapt and consider multiple factors would remain crucial. They would reassess the situation, weighing the new context’s unique factors and adjusting their decisions accordingly.
Key takeaways:
– Decision-making in project management involves balancing competing factors and prioritizing project goals.
– Context plays a significant role in shaping decisions, and adaptability is essential.
– Ethical considerations and long-term implications should always be taken into account.
this is detailed and helpful.
Thanks Livia for this amazing contribution.
It is detailed and explanatory
What I understood from the three expert discussion is; their sole aim was to achieve a goal and give in a quality project.
The project manager would act differently on a different context because I believe every individual has a way of handling difficulty or challenges.
Victoria
Cohort 17 team 10
A project manager would adapt their approach to achieve a goal in different contexts because each context presents unique challenges, opportunities, and requirements. They must be flexible and responsive to ensure the project aligns with the specific needs, constraints, and priorities of each context. This might involve adjusting their communication style, risk management strategies, resource allocation, or stakeholder engagement approach to optimize project outcomes. By doing so, they can leverage the strengths and mitigate the weaknesses of each context to achieve the project’s objectives.
Ibeh Chiamaka
Cohort 17 team 5
The project managers would have handled the issues differently depending on the context. No two projects will encounter same issues but lessons learnt from the experts are that they communicated with stakeholders involved before taking final decisions. The goals of the project and the reality on ground and the factors affecting the implementation of the projects were x-rayed before decisions were made.
Problems differs depending on the scope, and dealing with difficult situations requires that it should be within the context of the project.
I believe the experts will act differently depending on the context, there are different ways of dealing with different situations but whenever a difficult decision is needed to be made, a project manager should take into consideration the scope of the work and goals of the team so that the decision will not change the teams goal.
A project manager needs to consider the feasibility and viability of a project when making a decision, also the option for continuing versus cancellation of the project needs to be clearly defined and discussed with the team members.
Lawrence C Johnson
Cohort 17 Team 6
Listening to these three Project Managers, I have been able to understand that in handling a project, decision making can be very challenging especially when it has to do with a difficult decision.
But one thing I discovered about the there project managers was that in all of these challenges or difficulties in decision making, achieving the goal of the project was the main aim.
As a prospective Project Manager, I should expect challenges and as well be ready not to give up along the line, I should as well work with a positive mindset and persevere amidst every challenge.
Genevieve Osondu
Cohort 17 Team 5
Listening to these managers have been able to understand one important aspect of PM which is in respective of the difficult situation encountered during a project ,which can not be overemphasis because as said from the initial aspect of this lesson that there is no perfect project and that PM thrives on chaos . It is expedient to note that when on a project one may encounter unforeseen issues either from internal or external adversities but in whichever angle its emerges from one important thing to have in mind as a PM and as said by the managers is the project goals which you must not deviates from in the face of hurdles.
So, sometimes a project manager have to use his critical thinking that is outside the written rules and regulations or scopes to resolved issues.
have learnt in the cause of this lesson that as a project manager always be ready and to expect the unplanned for which would or may calls for some tough decision making .
Encountering difficult situation during project is an expectation that can not be ruled out. As the case of the managers in the video who gave their experience, they all had one thing in common; keep the company’s goal above any other factor influencing decision making. As long as ethical standards are not compromised, integrity and trust built with good communication and understanding, its a win for everyone.
A professional manager despite situation being confronted, will push forward organizational goals above internal or external driven adversities.
one thing I learned, is that in all of their challenges, they persevered to protect the value of their organization. Some problems can be unforeseen, perhaps why we call it a problem, and that brings out the critical thinking in you as a project manager to proffer a solution, just like that of the language barrier. Most times too, as a project manager, compromise that aligns with your values can be tolerated.
Giving the fact that one of the instructor’s had earlier mentioned that project managers thrive on chaos, having watched this reviews from these project managers it resonates with me,
I have also come to understand with the learning so far,that regardless of how smooth the project journey seems,you as a project manager will need to give room for unforseen circumstances where you might need to take some tough decisions as they arise.
Listening to the Project Managers speak about the tough decisions they had to make handling a project, i discovered that amidst the difficulty, they tend to move towards the goal of the project still even when the parties involved were in serious conflict. They reminded the parties about the very goal of the project and kept the bond that existed between the parties. You know, i remember what the project manager in the earlier lessons mention about “project managers thriving in chaos” and it dawns on me more deeper that as a Project Manager, I have to know how to handle conflicts that arises on the spur of the moment because chaos will come in unannounced
For one, he said that language was a barrier for him at some point.
Language can always be a barrier, but there are always ways to maneuver it. Either having a translator or using translator apps.
In a different context, they might have executed their project in another way as there is no defined way of going a problem. Sometimes, the problems we face help us get more insights on how to go about solving them.
From the 3 experiences shared, it was obvious that achieving the aim was the goal so with consistency, diligence and ruggedity
They were able to work around the problems and come up with a way out
As an aspiring project manager, I should expect challenges and be ready to sort them out in a composed manner and be ready to let go of my ego when situation demands and do the needful
The difficult decisions taken in the three different scenarios provided had one thing in common – providing a solution.
All project managers used different approaches. However, they had to communicate in a way that didn’t aggravate the issues at hand. I learned that compromise can be a powerful skill and being humble.
Overall, the project goal was the determining factor in making these difficult decisions. When the advantages are less than the disadvantages, there is nothing wrong with addressing everyone involved that the project should be cancelled.
The video isn’t playing for me, I don’t know if it’s my browser, network issues or my system that is the problem. I can’t say anything yet.
The three different project managers took different decisions but at the same time, they followed a laid out pattern which is: “they were being guided by the ethics of the profession!” Even though they were faced with a difficult situation, they were still able to provide solution to the issue on ground.
In the case of any difficult situation, always remember the end goal of the project and be ready to take decisions, make sacrifices where possible so that you can achieve that desired goal. If the circumstances are not favorable and the project needs to be canceled to avoid more losses, the project manager should be able to tactically explain to his or her team the reason he or she is taking the decision to cancel without sending a wrong signal or notion to his or her team mates. This is where being able to communicate well with team members will do the magic!
Project management is guided by ethics so in the case of the 3 experts, the decisions they took were guided by the ethics despite being in a dilemma, there are some considerations they included in the decision making.
It is my view that ethical considerations differ according to context so yes the decisions may be different in other set ups. What differentiate decisions is the context
For one, he said that language was a barrier for him at some point.
Language can always be a barrier, but there are always ways to maneuver it. Either having a translator or using translator apps.
In a different context, they might have executed their project in another way as there is no defined way of going a problem. Sometimes, the problems we face help us get more insights on how to go about solving them.
What was important for the project managers was the goal and objectives of their various projects and the need for collaboration across board.
in a different context, i think they would have acted differently, as their is no one singular way/method in handling challenges, what is most important is that the goal as well as the objectives are not lost.
The difficult decisions being faced by the experts during the project, what was important for them in taking the decisions was that, in making the decision they had to look at the goal in mind, what they wanted to achieve, the reason why the project was created and where able to effectively communicate it to the people involved and work to make adjustments and series of decisions to ensure that the deliverables are being achieved
The managers took the most likely decisions for the project, hence, I don’t think they would act differently in another context since the measure taken was for the best interest of all involved in the project.
Kennedy Sunday
The 3 experts took a difficult decision differently because of situation they face in their project deliverable. though it seems difficult but with more proactive measures which was effective communications approach. Their decisions were based on ethical within internal and external factors. there was no other alternative.
Taking the best decision for all parties involved….
I don’t think they would act differently except a different action would benefit everyone
If they would act differently in a different context then it would be because they couldn’t do otherwise in the situation at hand. I believe there really are no rules to these things,just make sure that whatever’s the case scenario,you act calmly and in the best interest of those who work with you and the clients. That way,you’ll always deliver,no matter the situation.
Anibuko Pamela Ogechi. Cohort 17,team 2
Sometimes we have to make difficult decisions to achieve a goal.
This decision helps in completing our projects peacefully without in convincing your team members and also maintaining transparency between team members and stakeholders.
Effective project Management requires meeting the project timelines and achieving the project objectives
Adewole Oluwabukunmi
Cohort 17
Team 1
Tough decisions are often made to achieve a set goal. As stated in the video, meeting the deadline of the project is more important irrespective of the convenience if the team members provided the will be compensated at the end of the project.
No two projects are exactly the same and so reactions to difficulties presented by different projects may elicit different reactions from the different project managers.
The key point however is that, whatever the difficulties that evolve, focusing on achieving the main objective should be paramount. Doing this helps to channel energies towards resolving each problem that evolve.
This is what could be deduced from three project managers who inspire of unexpected challenges that threatened the success of their projects, they were willing to think differently rather than fuelling the crisis like:
• disallowing ego,
•strengthening relationship with members with previous negative premonition,
•seeking to address needs, pacifying Team members,
•reaching out to alternative sources of supply to ensure project continuity,
•coming to a compromise in difficult issues and
•conquering the tendency for language barrier to be a major source of contention.
Emmanuel Olusegun Omotere
Cohort 17
Team 4
I think the main focus was to complete the project in good terms with all the parties involved.
They wouldn’t have done it differently. They all agreed that difficult situations to be communicated clearly. Even in the difficult circumstances, they managed it well. They were result oriented, focused and determined to arrive at a solution. They dropped their ego and collaborated with clients to make the best decisions and they achieved their goals.
Chinasa Anikeze
Cohorts17, team3
I think they may act differently in another context because Project managers encounter various challenges throughout the course of a project and each problem might require a different solution.
Aishat Aiteseme Abdulrazaaq
Cohort 17
Team 1
I believe that maintaining the ethics of the profession is one of, if not the most important thing these project managers had to consider in taking the important decisions they had to take and they could have acted differently in a different context for so many reasons ,one of which is
1. Experience-their many or few years in practice can largely affect whatever decision they decide to take that hopefully doesn’t go against the ethics of the profession.
Project managers encounter various challenges throughout a project’s lifecycle. Effective decision-making helps them identify and implement the best solutions to address these situations as they arise.
In a different context where the decisions to be made does not affect the organizational values and are in line with the budget, deadline and with zero to minimum risks the managers might have made a different decision
In their decision-making processes, experts typically weigh key factors such as risk assessment, ethical considerations, stakeholder interests, and the long-term implications of their choices. The specific context plays a crucial role in shaping their decisions, as varying circumstances can alter priorities and available options. For example, in less pressured scenarios or when stakeholder priorities differ, experts might focus more on strategic innovation and long-term benefits rather than immediate problem-solving. Additionally, considering broader impacts and aligning decisions with overarching goals can lead to more sustainable and forward-thinking outcomes. This approach ensures that decisions not only address current challenges but also contribute to the long-term success and integrity of the project.
making difficult decision in any project as a project manger in necessary especial to avoid a chaotic outcome and also maintain some levels of transparency
in the video, the three project managers were also concerned about the pros and cons to consider before making that decision, in as much as it painful with all the resources has been put into the job so far, what needs to be done has to be done.
The three Project Managers must make decisions based on a variety of scenarios, budgets, deadlines, and risks; however, all must be made with the primary goal of resolving challenges in mind.
To prevent preventable issues from cropping up in the middle of project operations, it is critical for project managers to critically align with the procedures involved in project management from the outset. As a result, frequent, intensive team communication is required.
Adewale Bisola
PM Boot camp cohort 16( Group 1)
Dealing with difficult decisions as a project manager requires:
1. *Clear objectives*: Understanding the project’s goals and priorities to make decisions that align with them.
2. *Accurate information*: Gathering relevant and reliable data to inform decision-making.
3. *Critical thinking*: Objectively analyzing options and potential outcomes.
4. *Risk assessment*: Identifying and evaluating potential risks and consequences.
5. *Stakeholder input*: Consulting with relevant stakeholders to understand their perspectives and needs.
6. *Creative problem-solving*: Finding innovative solutions to complex problems.
7. *Decisiveness*: Making timely and confident decisions, even in uncertain situations.
8. *Communication skills*: Effectively explaining decisions and rationales to stakeholders.
9. *Flexibility*: Being adaptable and willing to adjust decisions as circumstances change.
10. *Accountability*: Taking ownership of decisions and being responsible for their outcomes.
11. *Ethical considerations*: Ensuring decisions align with ethical principles and organizational values.
12. *Collaboration*: Working with team members and stakeholders to share knowledge and expertise.
By considering these factors, project managers can make informed, effective, and timely decisions that support project success.
Dealing with difficult decisions as a project manager requires a thoughtful, innovative and bold approach to explore the best possible outcomes.
As explained difficult decision is one where there is no obvious way forward, you have a number of options that has their pros and cons.
Firstly, one of the most difficult decisions to make as project manager is deciding to pull the plug on a project before delivering. There are some reasons why this happens:
It could be change in the organization’s priority or technical reasons why the project is no longer feasible. Whatever the reason(s) maybe the project manager must clearly state the reasons for cancelling against reasons for continuing, so that the team and stakeholders are aware.
secondly, drawing a team with diverse backgrounds, languages and competences can be challenging since communication is a must in a project. But when you find a way to communicate and get the team to work together, it is also rewarding.
Odinfe David Chika
Team7
Cohort16
Edeh Chibueze Goodluck
Team 3, Cohort 16
For the temporary water supplier, they took a bold step of involving their client and communicating with local stakeholders to ensure that water was available for the project. This emphasized the need of of decision-making skills from a project manager.
In the event that the local stakeholders couldn’t meet the demand, the project would have been terminated at an early stage before it could be delivered.
Stephen Izuchukwu Emeasoba.
Team 9. Cohort 16.
Dealing with difficult decisions as a project manager requires a thoughtful and structured approach to achieved the best possible outcomes.
From the video, it was important for them to take the decision they took to ensure resolution of the issues with the stakeholders and agree on possible solutions.
For this to be achieved, the project managers were calm, Keeping their emotions in check and approached the decision objectively.
They were transparent with their team and stakeholders, and were prepared to address resistance and concerns from stakeholders about the issues, and discus possible solutions.
The project managers can act differently in a different context, depending on the issues that needs to be addressed and the stakeholder involved.
Decision making is one of the major skill a project manager should possess. Ability to identify issues early during a project lifecycle and work together with the project team and project board to take a decision is very important.
The goal or objective of any project is to meet the users requirement for the product, if the requirement cannot be met, even with the tolerances in place, then the motive for the project is defeated.
The project managers in the about lessons, could have acted differently if it was in a BAU (Business as usual) environment.
Project managers face numerous challenges and obstacles throughout a project’s lifecycle. Effective decision-making enables them to identify and implement the best solutions to overcome these the situation at the time.
As a project manager sometimes faced with difficult challenges. Especially in situations where the plugs are pulled before delivery date. I believe that the team’s approach would vary depending on the specific project scenario, as each project presents its unique challenges and experiences. However, their ability to collaborate, brainstorm, and work together towards a common goal, despite the obstacles, is a valuable asset that will help them navigate challenges and achieve project success.
Dealing with difficult decisions involves a careful balance of analysis, stakeholder consideration, risk assessment, and alignment with organizational goals and ethical standards. By approaching challenging decisions systematically and thoughtfully, you can make well-informed choices that lead to positive outcomes for your projects and stakeholders.
Dealing with difficult decisions.
Referring to the 3 experts who have described their difficult decisions taken in a project, I think what was important for them in taking the decision they took is to build up different ideas that will enable them to carry out the project successfully which will be based on their different role and job specification in a project. To the question if they will act differently in a different context? This is obviously “YES” Why? For every project to be completed successfully it will not be a one-man thing, it must involve different job role which will be acted on differently. For example, taking a project of Developing a Health Application, here we will need a product design, frontend and backend web developer, a mobile developer etc. they act differently in their various context or role to achieve the goal of Developing a Health Application.
My name is Kingsley Okpoko, Team 6, cohort 16.
About dealing with difficult decisions, i have to come understand that we cannot run away from challenges in life, even in what ever we do.
I want to believe that Project managers will act differently in different contexts because stakeholders needs varies from pausing a project because of unstable economic policies to prioritizing a higher project, or change in management with a different ideologies, etc.
Daniel eyo
Team 5,cohort 16,In my own view they would have acted differently in a different project because every project has its own measures, experience, and needs but their ability to manage any risk or change with effective communication will give them an edge to scale through
Reflecting on the decision-making processes of the experts, key factors included reliance on data and evidence, considering stakeholder impact, balancing long-term and short-term benefits, and ensuring alignment with organizational values. In a different context, they might act differently due to varying stakeholder needs, data availability, and specific organizational goals, but these core principles would still guide their decisions. The adaptability of their approach would depend on the unique challenges and priorities of the new context.
Yes, the experts might act differently in a different context. Decisions are influenced by factors like stakeholder needs, data availability, and organizational goals, which can vary significantly across various scenarios. While core principles such as reliance on data, stakeholder impact, and alignment with values guide their decisions, the specific actions taken would adapt to the unique challenges and priorities of the new context. This adaptability ensures that decisions are effective and relevant, reflecting the dynamic nature of different project environments.
Blessing Olusakin ( Team 3 Cohort16). I think they would have acted differently if it was a different scenario because every project comes with its own unique and peculiar experience however their ability to sit at round table for ideas, brainstorming on solutions and how to navigate the challenges focusing on the goal of the project will help a lot to scale through and arrive at the project goal.
For me I would say they would have acted same way if it was a different project because all their actions were centered to definitive goals which could still be applied in any similar or different projects and still come up successfully. They all emphasized following strategies below:
– The importance of critical thinking and sound judgment
– Balancing competing priorities and stakeholder expectations
– Communicating effectively and transparently
– Being adaptable and open to changing circumstances or new information
– Reflecting on their own biases and assumptions
Rose Matarise
Difficult decisions require careful consideration and assessment of various factors.They all needed to consider Project objectives and alignment and evaluate whether the project still aligns with the organization’s objectives and goals. A significant shift in priorities may warrant termination.Also to be considered are the risks associated with continuing the project versus the risks of terminating it.
They all made decisions based on the challenges the faced during their project, but it is important that in taking decisions in difficult project that requires collaboration you need to A) keep your eyes on the goal B) Be ready to make compromise especially when dealing with other managers who are sentimental about the project.
For project that requires speaking to people of different language, it is important that you find an efficient way of communication.
If the project is to be cancelled maybe because the Organization have higher priority projects, it is important that you send time catching the lessons, picking up positive knowledge and skills, this could help you in subsequent project you will manage.
hi, my name is Ruth Chidinma Albert, As a project manager sometimes you will have to deal with difficult decision to ensure the goal for the project is achieved,
by dropping ones Ego
making sure the option are set out real
getting the relevant parties together, the local maintenance team, the organizing team and ourself
and also having a deep connection installed which is very important for the project
They all made the decisions based on the peculiar challenge they faced. They will all act differently in other circumstances because they made those decisions based on the challenge they all faced. Been a project manager does not have a rigid reaction but a flexible solution .
Having a meeting of all stakeholders involved brings everyone forward to accept your decision has a Project Manager
I’m Fatimah Oluwatoyin. What was important to the experts was achieving the project goal. So, if taking difficult decision is the way to achieve the goal, then let it be.
Though, it might be painful going back to do some adjustment on the project. We should also remember that a project is not complete if the goal is not achieved.
Ojomo Ayodele Olaitan
Cohort 16
Team 7
No, i don’t think the project manager experts would have done anything different in a different context because providing solutions to problems or issues usually stem from the experience gained in solving problems in past projects.
The Project manager experts here simply stuck to their guns and executed their plan, all for the sake of delivering a good and quality project.
1. Transparency in both word and deed is crucial, it shows who you are and what you would need to get the job done.
2. No Ego.
3. Collaborative efforts with partners, reminding them of the goal of the project and what they need to achieve. This was what the first experts iterated, a meeting wth relevant parties:
a. A water corporation.
b. The local maintenance team
c. the organizer
4. Compromisation: This could be well on the part of the PM experts or their partners which the 3rd project manager talk about, he trying to learn new language to effectively communicate to clients and team members, to ensure proper execution of the project.
5. Avoidance of bringing in past bad experiences from other failed projects into a new one by the PM themselves or their partners.
Aminah Yusuff
Team 2 Cohort 16
I do not think the experts would have acted differently in a different context because there is an objective. They remained fixated on their objective, remembering their purpose and adapting their approach as needed. Through flexibility, cooperation, and a willingness to compromise, they stayed committed to achieving their goal. By sustaining a positive outlook, even in challenging circumstances, they stayed motivated and focused on success.
The female expert emphasizes on the need not to never allow your ego comes in the way of your project
Good decision making is very essential in project management, the project managers were influenced by the situation of the project.
Below are the points considered:
1. Technical reasons
2. Spend some time to analyze the project.
3. Meeting with parties involved.
4. Collaboration with other parties
5. Draw their attention towards the goals.
6. Encourage them on why the decision must be made.
Considering the situation at hand, every project manager has to make a sound decision which cuts all round for the best of all the stakeholders. From the video we see that improved communication is very important to get off the challenge of language barrier, weighing the pros and cons and setting out clearly reason of decision is also very important. Communication also helps bring harmony in any stakeholders meeting.
Difficult decisions are taken based on the situation(s) at hand however, the pm will focus a lot on collaboration and clearly communicate to the team
Reflecting on the decisions the project managers took, I would say they will act differently to suite the different situations. However, they made some key points which might not change. For instance, the project manager making everyone keep focus and or redirect the team’s focus on the goal of the project. Also increased collaboration and improved communication skill, to take out language barrier.
Wale Oyegunle
Team 8 Cohort 16
The three experts made those decisions after considering multiple options for what was best for the project’s objectives or goals. As a PM, you are saddled with making decisions on behalf of the project team, however, communicating effectively with the team and stakeholders could provide viable solutions in different cases.
It’s important for them in taking this decisions because it’s for the good of the project plan and also for the good of the organization they represent but I would have used my negotiation skills to make a suitable plan to enable me finish up the project instead of ending before the due date.
From Joseph Ikechukwu Onyeocha:
Certainly! The 3 Different people may react in various ways when faced with difficult decisions in a project.
1. The Analytical Thinker: This person prefers to approach decisions with a logical and systematic mindset.
2. The Intuitive Visionary: This individual relies heavily on gut feelings and intuition when making decisions.
3. The Collaborative Consensus-Builder: This type of person values input and consensus from others in the decision-making process. They might:
These reactions illustrate how different personalities can approach difficult decisions in distinct ways, drawing on their unique strengths and preferences.
I don’t think they would have acted differently because they have the interest of the project and would want to do what they feel is the best for the project. There are times you have to terminate and project and restrategize or start all over again this decision is always the hardest to take but necessary.
Also calling all stakeholders to determine the way forward is very vital. One just need to know which approach is best.
Nnadi Stella Chidinma
Team 7
As a PM, when faced with difficult decisions
1. Do not let your ego get in the way of communicating properly.
2. Go back to the goals of the project find out what went wrong and explain it individually to every member of the team and also have a general meeting for brainstorming to look for solutions and resolve the issues.
3. When there is conflict of interest, negotiate between parties and find common ground.
The Project Managers were more concerned about the best way forward. They kept their focus on the goal, why they are there, and considered what necessary adjustment, compromise and collaboration they could make to meet their goal. They maintained a positive mindset in any situation.
In a different context they wouldn’t act differently because of the values they have as Project Managers. For instance, the lady expert spoke about herself not allowing ego to get in the way of her negotiation. That value enabled her meet the clients need and she won the day. They all were purpose driven, not rigid, and solution oriented. The context might be different other times with varying challenges and decisions to make. But In any case, as project managers they have to find a balance that is guided by ethics, values and norms as they did in the situations in the video.
Given all the challenges faced by the project managers, their difficult decisions would not have taken a different route considering the lack of supporting resources. After thorough consideration by the organization, it became clear that language constraints significantly impacted project management. These constraints are a fundamental aspect of the challenges we face, shaping the decisions and strategies employed by the project managers
Reflecting on the decision taken by the experts, I would not have acted differently.
The goal of any project is for it to be completed, irrespective of the challenges be it the language barrier, unforeseen technical issues, low resources et. c. sometimes for a project to be completed, there must be compromise on the side of everyone involved in the project (from the project team to the sponsors and stakeholders) because it will be very painful if a project is to be canceled when time and resources have been invested in to.
The experts found it difficult to take the decisions they were required to take because they considered all resources including time, energy plus all things everyone had pit to ensure the success of the projects.
No, in different projects, given the same challenge they won’t act differently. Basically because they understand their roles as project managers and the demand thereof. They understand the importance of negotiation, which they applied and got results. They were able to adhere to the ethical expectations of the project, hence they considered the impact of the challenges on everyone directly or indirectly. They had to act fast to address the situations.
I would say i wouldn’t have acted any differently from them because one of the necessary characteristics a PM must have is negotiation. That is, they must be able to negotiate in order to get a win-win for the project and team
I would say, I wouldn’t have acted differently as the goal of every project manager is to see that all projects are done and that at the end of the day there is a win-win situation, and that stakeholders are satisfied. All three are centered on clear communication and transparency to the team as this is a core characteristics of a good project manager.
Reflecting on the decisions made by three project management experts in challenging situations and how context influences their actions, I don’t think they would have acted differently seeing that their aim was centered on
— Minimizing risks and ensuring the well-being and productivity of the project stakeholders(Team)
— Balancing Quality and Budget.
— Ensuring they don’t slack on the part of effective and honest communication.
The goal of every project manager is to ensure that a project is delivered as expected and planned. However, in ensuring that the project is achieved, it must not be at the expense of the organization’s ethics and values. In summary the goal is to have a win-win at the end of everything.
The question is, in the midst of these difficult decision making, would they act differently in a different context?
Well, there might be a different approach to making difficult decisions in different context. Nonetheless, one thing is constant, in every decision taken there ought not to be a compromise as regards to the ethics and values of both parties.
Damilola Ogunsakin
From the video evidence, it’s evident that their response to the situation was likely not context-dependent. They handled it adeptly, maintaining transparency and clear communication with their team and stakeholders. By keeping their focus on the ultimate goal, they were able to navigate challenges effectively and find appropriate solutions.
Firstly I would say, the goal of the project they were working on is more important to them. Making those difficult decisions they took wasn’t simple, but the reason why the project started initially was stronger than the odds. The goal served as a driving force in making the decision.
The decision to terminate a project early isn’t a simple one at all because the team members would have invested their time and expertise in the project based on the outlined goals and plans. So then the decision of the project manager to terminate the project after considering the odds or other factors has not been to hurt the effort of the team members but to prevent a major loss at the end of the project. Loss of time, money and resources.
To the question “Would they have acted differently in a different context?” I would say No to this. Part of the quality of a good project manager is to ensure the well-being of the team members and other stakeholders and to ensure the project is successfully delivered on time and within the budget. Deciding to terminate a project early, sounds like the best decision if it contradicts the ethics of the job.
It’s better to take that tough decision than living of moving on false hope. I won’t have acted differently. They made the right choice at the perfect timing.
From the information gathered from the video, I do not think they would have acted any different in another context. My reasons are that, firstly, they all understood the goals set for the the project which was the major value of their organisation and that sets their decision in motion. They also took into cognizance the essence of collaborating as a team and made use of effective communication to achieve the desired goal irrespective of the challenges encountered. These are great skills required of any project manager, they deployed it and it allowed them get the desired result.
From my point of view, I think they would have acted the same way once it was in the interest of the project and the organization, although it may be difficult for them. As project managers, making a tough decision is part of the skill required.
From this context, they all focused on the importance of team work, clear communications, project goals and above all supportive collaborations and these variables greatly helped them and also shaped their decision making mindset which resulted to a win win situation in the various situations.
So personally, I think they still would have done same in a different context because they properly understood the importance of the aforementioned variables in project management
Flexibility is crucial when faced with tough decisions, and collaboration and sustainable teamwork are the ultimate solutions to overcoming challenging project decisions.
In each situation, the project goals, team work and collaboration was important and this help shape their decisions. Having these as priority I believe theybwould act the same way in different contexts because their decisions re shaped by the same values.
Hello!!!
My name is PAUL NWEKE, COHORT 16, TEAM 9.
From the video, I noticed the following from them;
– Decision making – Difficult decision to terminate a project.
– Language challenges – Language barriers.
– Funding issue – Funding challenges for a project.
Among these challenges, they were able to overcome the challenges by making sure that they followed the due process. They made sure that there was effective communication with the right authorities and channels to make sure the gap was closed properly. They made sure there was a meeting with the team and other stakeholders involved to resolve the issues. And that decision was just a wonderful one. I think this is the right thing they are supposed to do and I do not think doing otherwise in another context would yield a maximum result like what they did here – engaging the right stakeholders through a proper communication channel.
JESUDIMU OPEYEMI
Here are the three major challenges I noted from the video:
1. Making the difficult decision to terminate a project early.
2. Facing unexpected funding challenges for a project.
3. Language barriers presenting a challenge.
Here’s how each challenge was resolved:
1. Terminating a project early may result from management decisions. However, it’s important to carefully consider the impact, especially if another high-priority project is expected to be carried out. To keep the team motivated, the original goal should be kept in mind, and the knowledge and skills gained should not go to waste.
2. Addressing the lack of funding for a project involved seeking collaboration with external parties who could provide assistance, with the understanding that they would receive a return on their investment.
3. Overcoming language barriers is crucial for smooth communication within the project team and with stakeholders. Clear and effective communication is essential for successful project execution.
Frankly, i think project managers often in handling various projects will possibly face difficult situations that make require taking difficult decisions. From the video , i learnt its important for a project manager not to have a ego but to emphasize the place of team work, collaboration, good and effective communication with all team members at all time. Also, an overall believe in the reason or objectives of the projects also helps in been able to cope with taking difficult decisions and above personal ethics as a project manager remains significant.
From the video of the three (3) expert points, there were 3 point i can pick from there
1. Decision making:- one of the important key as a Project manager is Decision Making, decision is not isolate to one person in field of project management.
Making decision is a thing that one or group of people must be very careful to carry out for the success of the task or project
2. Reflection:- this is the process of check over and over before it can be implement on a project. a place of reflection is very important in project manager life.
3. Different context:- different context bring different ideas together for which manager and team workers should compel together to safe guide the damage that may occur in future
Uwoghiren Osagie Williams
Cohort 16
Team 10
Being cool and calm is a great tool for managing any project even in a family setting, you don’t rush, take decisions and tackle problems just as they come and achieving real life solutions to them, this could be tiring or rather frustrating initially but I am very optimistic that it will pay off at the long run. This actually helped her achieve what she wouldn’t have if she had used a negative approach.
Here is my pick from the three Project Manager sharing of their difficult decision:
I have realized that Project Manager is not as easy as the name depict. A successful project must posses 3 or more of the give skillset if not all in decision making.
I their discussion, they wouldn’t have made a better decision for the success of the project if communication, collaboration, ad ethics were absence.
Stephen Amarachi Grace Team 9
Considering the situation at hand faced by the three experts, I don’t think they could have done anything differently as they had to make the toughest decisions in that project.
One thing I picked out was collaboration. Project management is not a solo adventure. By collaborating with your team or other team if the need be will also help with decision making.
Communication is key. Despite the fact that all the experts needed to make a decision, they communicated with their team. Imagine terminating a project early and the project manager just decided that and does it without letting the team know. It would demoralize them as they would feel their efforts was a waste. Communication is also crucial even in dealing with difficult decision.
What was important for them was delivering a complete project to the stakeholders and making sure the efforts of the project team was never in vain.
I don’t think they would have done something different as at that time. The approach they took was the best approach as at that time.
My name is Omopariola Emmanuel Seun
Hard decision should be taken, as to whether to cancel the project or to continue.
The project manager should go extra miles, make sacrifices, take the team back to the initial goal, collaborate the team.
They were able to employ a good communication and collaboration skills in order to solve the difficulties. Margaret Ebieme, Cohort 16 team 6
From the 3 experts point of view, there were 3 points that was highlighted from there discussion
!. Decision making: in Project management decision making can not be taken from one person i the place of project work.
Making a decision you must be careful in other not affect the entire project works or task.
2. reflection: this is the best ideas to look out over and over before the implementation of the project on site
3. Different context: bringing different ideas together make the manager and his teams to safe guide the risk that may occur in feature during implementing the project.
Esther Ezinne Uwoghiren
Cohort 16
Team 4
I don’t think they had any cause to regret any of the decisions they made.
As one speaker said, ego was kept aside. They ensured that communication lines were still kept open with all stakeholders to maintain continuity of the project. Another thing that they did was to be open and transparent – they were not afraid to admit the mistakes, take blame and work towards achieving a solution.
Communication works hand in hand with the Ethics
All three experts made sure the communicated effectively to their project team and clients concerning all the problems they faced. they also remained calm and collected and made sure to find a solution
The 3 expert highlighted 3 major points, which are;
Decision:
Being extremely careful when making decisions in order not to affect the project.
Reflection:
Reflecting on ideas over and over again before implementing them.
Different Context:
In a different context, such as a less severe weather condition where safety risks were manageable, decisions made should be considered. The balance between safety and project deadlines would shift based on the severity of the risk.
Their aims is to streak a balance and solve the difficulties or kios that arise
One of the power tools is communication and collaboration they ensure they have good communication which makes them address the situation and look for alternatives to achieve their goals
Some need to understand the moral values of his team members
Communication, collaboration and understanding with all parties involved in the project was their major way of handling those difficult decisions, then looking back at what the goal of the project was in order to achieve it’s aims and goals.
Communication and collaboration with all parties involved in the project was their major way of handling those difficult decisions, then looking back at what the goal of the project was in order to achieve it’s aim.
They prioritized the Project, while giving Clear communication and then Collaboration.
Their ability to remain positive, clearly convey ideas and work seamlessly as a group is truly impressive.
Why the Project Managers took the decisions which they did:
These 3 project managers had one aim in mind from the onset which was the achieving the goals of the project.
They had issues ranging from communication to collaboration to resources not being able to go round and a host of other key issues. It took the collaboration of all the stakeholders to actively engage and proffer a solution to the hurdles encountered in the course of the project.
The different case scenerios entailed different approaches to resolve the different type of problems that came up within the project.
Would they have handled it otherwise in different situations, most probably, but the solutions would still have been tailored to the needs of the project hurdle.
Communication and collaboration with all parties involved in the project was their major way of handling those difficult decisions, then looking back at what the goal of the project was in order to achieve it’s aim.
What was important for the taking of the decision where that the goal of the project must be achieved and nothing short of that, this help them to know when to continue or cancel a project, as a project manager
.
Expert 1: Sarah, Project Manager in Construction
Decision:
Sarah had to decide whether to continue construction during an unexpected severe weather event. Continuing would risk worker safety, but halting the project would delay completion and increase costs.
Reflection:
For Sarah, worker safety was paramount. She ultimately decided to halt construction despite the financial implications. This decision was influenced by the ethical responsibility to ensure the well-being of her team and compliance with safety regulations.
Different Context:
In a different context, such as a less severe weather condition where safety risks were manageable, Sarah might have decided to implement additional safety measures and continue working. The balance between safety and project deadlines would shift based on the severity of the risk.
Expert 2: Michael, IT Project Lead
Decision:
Michael had to choose between two software solutions for a critical project. One solution was well-known and reliable but expensive, while the other was less expensive but relatively untested.
Reflection:
Michael prioritized reliability and long-term stability. He opted for the more expensive, well-known software to ensure project success and minimize the risk of future issues. Trust in proven technology and risk aversion guided his decision.
Different Context:
If the project had a more flexible budget or if the timeline allowed for thorough testing, Michael might have considered the cheaper, untested software. In a startup environment with limited funds, cost-saving could outweigh the risk, prompting a different choice.
Expert 3: Lisa, Marketing Campaign Manager
Decision:
Lisa faced a dilemma between launching a marketing campaign on schedule with incomplete market research or delaying the launch to gather more data. Launching on schedule could capture immediate market opportunities but risked missing the target audience due to insufficient insights.
Reflection:
For Lisa, understanding the audience and ensuring the campaign’s effectiveness were crucial. She decided to delay the launch to complete the research, believing that a well-targeted campaign would yield better long-term results despite the short-term delay.
Different Context:
In a fast-moving market where timing is critical, such as during a holiday season or a trending event, Lisa might prioritize speed over comprehensive data. Here, capturing the market opportunity quickly could be more important than perfect targeting.
Analysis
Common Factors in Decision-Making:
Values and Priorities: Each expert’s decision was heavily influenced by their core values, such as safety, reliability, and effectiveness.
Contextual Factors: The specifics of the project environment, such as severity of risks, budget constraints, and timing, significantly impacted the decisions.
Acting Differently in Different Contexts:
Sarah: In a less severe weather situation or with different safety protocols, she might balance safety and deadlines differently.
Michael: With more time or in a financially constrained environment, he might take a calculated risk on the cheaper software.
Lisa: In a time-sensitive market, she could prioritize a timely launch over exhaustive research.
These reflections highlight the importance of context in decision-making. While values provide a foundation, the specific circumstances and constraints of each project can lead to different decisions.
For each of these professionals, in making tough calls they prioritised the project, putting into consideration the goals and objectives of the project in the first place. They also considered the people. Without the people, as the PM, you can’t successfully achieve all that you set out to. So, getting the people to a place where their needs are met and they get the work done is a win-win.
Let’s not forget that project management is above all about achieving the planned objectives with the planned resources and within the planned timeframe.
And in order to deal with endogenous and exogenous factors, communication is needed that respects stakeholders.
One project manager’s decision may differ from another’s, but what is fundamental is the solidity of the team and its adaptability to any situation.
In my country, there’s an adage that goes ‘there’s never a problem without a solution’.
In taking decision, you deal with what is most important in the project or what will be the best for the project
What was important to them was ensuring proper management of the situation faced. They used different approaches depending on what they were faced with.
Reflect on what was important in taking the decision:
Ethics of their organization was important for them in taking the decision they did and also counting the cost and ensuring not to compromise on ethics and openness in their decision making.
Would they act differently in a different context, why?
I think they wouldn’t have acted differently in another context due to the fact that no matter the difficulty faced, the project team had adequate communication to the appropriate stakeholders. And this is crucial in the success of any project.
Why the Project Managers took the decision they made.
The major reason why they took the decision is that they are focused on the project goal. In achieving the goal they had to be flexible in addressing the challenges that came up. Hence through stakeholders engagement and collaboration, they were able to resolve issues and achieve their project goal.
Would they have acted differently?
Yes would have acted differently if all resources were available, stakeholders were not affected and are satisfied. But under the circumstance they wouldn’t have acted differently if they were to achieve their project goal.
Kennedy Anyanwu
Cohort 15
Yes they would act differently on a different context.
WHY?
Firstly the to project management see handling different project , obviously what A plans and decision would be will be different to B plans and decision would be depict the fact that they would follow same skills. Also them would be having different team’s to work on the project. If the two project managers are working on a project as a team then there won’t be difference in their plan and fulfillment of the project.
I think what was important to them was counting the cost, ensuring that they did not compromise on ethics and openness in the decisions made with regards to the stakeholders of the project.
While past projects can be used to set precedents for future projects, each project is actually unique in nature and should be handled in relation to the unique circumstances surrounding it.
They would react differently in different context because each situation requires different approach
Umeanolue Lilian
Team 6
Dealing with issues and taking important decision is one of the skill for a Project Manager.They did exactly what they were meant to do.They would have also acted the same in different context using a different approach.
Its basically all about decision making and updating the stake holders.
What was important for them is that regardless of the difficulty, the project has to go on and they had to find ways to navigate through the difficulty which will lead to a successful project. For them it was all about teamwork and adequate communication. I don’t think they would have acted differently in another context because no matter the difficulty faced, the project team and adequate communication to the appropriate stakeholders is a constant in the success of any project.
Determination, aiming and hitting your target
I think it was all about achieving the aim of the project that made the experts take their various decisions. If it wasn’t for their roles as project managers, maybe they would have acted differently because, as an individual it is up to you to decide if you want to work together to achieve a purpose or not.
The success of the project at hand was more important to them and that greatly influenced their decisions. I am certain that they would act differently in another situation, so long as it’s in the best interest of the project.
Osuji Mirian
May 10,2024@2:08
As already known project Managers are faced with critical task that are very burdensome but thank God for the three experts, that could handle their different situations amicably.
As a project manager, one must develop a good problem solving skill in order to achieve the best result in a project. However, the 3 experts did their best in resolving the issues faced and i know they would have made better decisions if the circumstances were different
Project managers deal with issues differently depending on the exact problem. It is important that project manager must showcase a high level of knowledge as well as empathy in dealing with issues that may concern the team member and the organization, in this case the issues will be dealt with different because of their morals and empathy concerning that situation.
Basically the three experts did their best in bring along lasting solution to the problems they encountered and treated it respectively. being a project manager problem solving skills is essential and each of the expert were faced with a different problem in their field and was able to manage the situation to the best of their knowledge with the help of other team members.
I believe the three experts did what they had to do in the circumstance in view of their role as PM from whom accountability and open communication with all stakeholders are essential.
Dealing with issues has already been said as part of project managers, but issues are dealt in different ways and perspective. We all have a way of dealing with issues, so in this case the issues will be dealt with different because of their morals and empathy concerning that situation.
Dealing with difficult issues is part of being a Project manager, it is inevitable. However, the recipe for dealing with this issues is always almost found in the kind of decision to be made, the issue involved and the stakeholders in play. I believe the project managers in the video did was necessary at the time, and handled the issues perfectly.
Project managers deal with issues differently depending on the nature of the problem. It is pertinent that project manager must showcase a high level of knowledge as well as empathy in dealing with an issue that may concern the team member and the organization.
Dealing with issues and taking important decision is one of the skill for a PM.They did exactly what they were meant to do.They would have also acted the same in different context using a different approach.
Its basically all about decision making and updating the stake holders.
As project managers, dealing with difficult decision in project management calls for a well-thought-out methodology. For the three Project managers ,each of them managed the difficulty in the best way they could. They openly analyzed the situation having gathered relevant data and information on the state of the project, engaged the stakeholders in the best way to get their views and concerns. They were ethical and followed due rules in their engagement. They were flexible in a few cases in getting the best of their teammates. They considered the pros and cons where necessary, in taken their choices. In each of their decisions, they had positive dispositions and impact despite the challenging situation and decision made. They ensured the stakeholders are clearly carried along having communicated the rationale behind the decision and got their feedback.
I believe they could have reacted differently in difference context, however whatever their reaction, I believe it will still be the best decision they can take in a challenging situation taking into consideration the stakeholders, holding forth the best values and ethics.
Familua Adeniyi
Cohort 15, Team 1
From the explanations of the experts, they would only try to save the situation and so can do whatsover that is right to be done. That would vary depending on the situation at hand and what needs to be done.
During the course of running a project, there are instances where you would need to make difficult decisions as a project manager.
One thing peculiar to the experts is their ability to communicate effectively with all stakeholders involved while analysing the situation on ground and thinking of possible alternatives. They were able to do this by considering the available resources,nature of project,technical issues e.t.c. Also, they were patient and calm enough to address the challenges. I believe that in a different situation, they wouldn’t act so differently because even though each project is unique, as a P. M, you need to be able to adapt to situations, be transparent with every stakeholder involved and think of possible alternatives.
Listening to the experts on the unique challenges they all faced in their different projects,one would realize that every project comes with it’s uniqueness, and proffering solutions to challenges must be a strong point of any project manager and with each decision a project manager arrives at, it must still uphold the value of the firm,this w
Can either make him or discredit him
.
So,every Project manager MUST possess these skills Communication skill,Critical Thinking, risk analysis ,risk manager ,teamwork and transparency .
Mnena
Cohort 15, Team 7
Project management is a challenging task because it requires the ability of a PM to make difficult decisions to have the ability to impact negatively or positively to organisational goals.
What was important to them, was how the decision and management skill (as regards the challenges faced) could impact on the project and organisational target. For instance, the speaker said, “it can be very painful to terminate a project early” but important consideration here is the reason behind the decision.
Would they act differently in a different context? Why?
Yes, because in most cases, different situations require different approaches.
Life itself is characterized by various challenges, and so a project is not immune to challenges. Of course, there might have been a vision for embarking on a project with good intentions but sometimes life happens which could lead to a change in priority, thus putting a pause, redirection, or entirely stopping a project regardless of how far it has gone or how much has been spent.
however, there could also be a good reason why a project has to be paused, redirected or stopped.
Whichever the case, in situations like this just as mentioned in the video, communicating with details to the various tiers of stakeholders is very key. Show empathy and in some cases compensating the project team for time spent might be a great thing to do. Other situations might require the Project manager to come up with a solution for the project to continue, either way communicating with stakeholders is Key.
Mary Ayo
One thing I noticed from the three experts is that there is a target they must achieve, they focused on the goal. And if I was in their shoes I wouldn’t have acted differently.
It was painful to have cancelled a project half way because of the efforts that have been put in to it.
But she had empathy and was able to manage the situation and speak with her team.
As project managers, dealing with difficult decision in project management calls for a well-thought-out methodology. For the three Project managers ,each of them managed the difficulty in the best way they could. They openly analyzed the situation having gathered relevant data and information on the state of the project, engaged the stakeholders in the best way to get their views and concerns. They were ethical and followed due rules in their engagement. They were flexible in a few cases in getting the best of their teammates. They considered the pros and cons where necessary, in taken their choices. In each of their decisions, they had positive dispositions and impact despite the challenging situation and decision made. They ensured the stakeholders are clearly carried along having communicated the rationale behind the decision and got their feedback.
I believe they could have reacted differently in difference context, however whatever their reaction, I believe it will still be the best decision they can take in a challenging situation taking into consideration the stakeholders, holding forth the best values and ethics.
Familua Adeniyi
Cohort 15, Team 1
Navigating challenging decisions requires a methodical and organized approach that harmonizes ethical considerations, practical consequences, and stakeholder interests.
It is important to gather pertinent information and assess potential outcomes for each alternative. Delve into the ethical principles at play, such as integrity, equity, and regard for others’ rights.
Engage with stakeholders to grasp their viewpoints and apprehensions. Evaluate the merits and demerits of each option, factoring in both immediate and long-term repercussions.
Prioritize choices that resonate with fundamental values and ethical norms, while also evaluating feasibility and impact. Upon reaching a decision, it is important to communicate it clearly and transparently, explaining the reasoning to affected parties.
Then, monitor the decision’s outcomes and remain open to adjustments if circumstances warrant them.
From the discussions of the experts, I was able to see that challenges are normal for managers but it differs and how to handle them differs too.
Once a manager is faced with a challenge or challenges, the next thing is to find a solution. Solutions can actually come from having a round table discussion with the team just as the expert with the venue issue. He was able to proffer solution despite the fact that the client had to pay extra.
Another thing i learnt is seeing a challenge as an opportunity. This I got from the expert who had communication as a challenge due to language barrier but he saw it as a value.
Also, it might be a difficult thing to terminate a project early but if it’s affecting the priority, it might be permitted and always be positive about everything even when there is a termination of project. Be positive because there are lessons to be learnt.
Despite the strain they all went through in making those tough decisions, their unrelenting determination to follow their ethical values of delivering the best services for their clients kept them going and enabled them stick to the decisions. Acting differently in another context would have been a matter of how dire the situation is and the consequences if they were to overlook the ethics and compromise
Olufemi Olayanju Cohort 15, Team 8
Every project is unique hence project managers must be prepared for the unforeseen and the unexpected. Project managers are usually task and result driven but there are situations that sometimes challenges the skill set and competency of a project manager. When this occurs it requires a situation analysis vis-a-vis the goal of the project.
In one of the cases mentioned, there was a need for continued business justification. For reason of a change in priority, a project had to be terminated. In this particular case of project termination, the sponsors due to change in priority decided to divert resources elsewhere after the take off of the project despite time, effort and commitment invested. Project termination could also be for technical reasons affecting the feasibility of the project. The project manager in either situation could not have acted differently as he or she is called to implement a plan to create a viable product. If the sponsor is no longer interested in sponsoring the project or the project cannot deliver on a viable product, it has to wind up prematurely.
In the MTD water infrastructure case, it was clearly a case of clash of interests between two managers wanting to offer service and deliver result. The lesson in this case was the fact that when confronted with difficult decisions , all stakeholders must collaborate in seeking a way forward. There is need for engagement, communication and compromise to forge ahead.
In handling difficult decision, there is need for problem analysis, collaborate with stake holders on the way forward, negotiation, consider all options, decide collaboratively, capture lessons and outputs from the resolution.
On whether the project managers would act differently in another context, it depends on the peculiar circumstances of the different context. The words different context suggest a different set of circumstances. For sure the project managers have learnt lessons from this particular scenarios which they can take forward to other project settings. Project managers are constantly learning on the job and getting better as managers. Project dynamics differ from one project to another but new projects are always enriched by lessons learnt from previous projects.
Every project is unique hence project managers must be prepared for the unforeseen and the unexpected. Project managers are usually task and result driven but there are situations that sometimes challenges the skill set and competency of a project manager. When this occurs it requires a situation analysis vis-a-vis the goal of the project.
In one of the cases mentioned, there was a need for continued business justification. For reason of a change in priority, a project had to be terminated. In this particular case of project termination, the sponsors due to change in priority decided to divert resources elsewhere after the take off of the project despite time, effort and commitment invested. Project termination could also be for technical reasons affecting the feasibility of the project. The project manager in either situation could not have acted differently as he or she is called to implement a plan to create a viable product. If the sponsor is no longer interested in sponsoring the project or the project cannot deliver on a viable product, it has to wind up prematurely.
In the MTD water infrastructure case, it was clearly a case of clash of interests between two managers wanting to offer service and deliver result. The lesson in this case was the fact that when confronted with difficult decisions , all stakeholders must collaborate in seeking a way forward. There is need for engagement, communication and compromise to forge ahead.
In handling difficult decision, there is need for problem analysis, collaborate with stake holders on the way forward, negotiation, consider all options, decide collaboratively, capture lessons and outputs from the resolution.
On whether the project managers would act differently in another context, it depends on the peculiar circumstances of the different context. The words different context suggest a different set of circumstances. For sure the project managers have learnt lessons from this particular scenarios which they can take forward to other project settings. Project managers are constantly learning on the job and getting better as managers. Project dynamics differ from one project to another but new projects are always enriched by lessons learnt from previous projects.
We are faced with one challenge or the other as individuals and as an organisation. These challenges vary from one project to another, hence there are need to function differently in resolving them.
A manager could resolve his or her team challenge by constant communication while other comes through a written plan for deliberation, another maybe through criticism as the case may be. In dealing with difficult decisions as a project manager, positivity is highly required to be able to withstand dilemmas of handling technical issues and critical decisions. Seeking opinions from different parties especially when there is a language barrier between the manager and some team workers.
There’s a great need to act differently in handling difficult decisions because we operate with different people with different barrier in communication, innovative ideas,values etc.
DEALING WITH DIFFICULT DECISIONS
CHINONYE DANIEL-UKAEGBU
COHORT 15
TEAM 3
Onadeko Tofunmi Cohort 15 Team 8
Dealing with difficult decisions requires a thoughtful and structured approach that balances ethical considerations, practical implications, and the interests of stakeholders. First, gather all relevant information and analyze the potential outcomes of each option. Consider the ethical principles involved, such as honesty, fairness, and respect for others’ rights. Engage with stakeholders to understand their perspectives and concerns. Weigh the pros and cons of each choice, taking into account both short-term and long-term consequences. Prioritize options that align with core values and ethical standards, while also considering feasibility and impact. Once a decision is made, communicate it clearly and transparently, explaining the rationale to those affected. Monitor the results of the decision and be open to adjustments if necessary.
I think they will act differently in different context.
These three team members consistently demonstrated strong work ethics, a deep understanding of their environment and project, and a commitment to delivering results despite challenges. By fully embracing the core principles and values of their project and organization, they effectively navigated and resolved difficulties encountered along the way. Their integration of work ethics, comprehensive project understanding, and dedication to achieving results, even in the face of obstacles, enabled them to find optimal solutions within the framework of their project and organization.
These three experts expressed critical thinking before deciding and coming up with solutions to resolve the issues on the ground.
Before making a decision as a PM,I believe this three expert will have think very well about and put some things into consideration especially for the first expert who terminate a project but as for the language barrier from the third expect I think hiring hiring a language translator will have be the best option for that
These three team members exhibited strong work ethics, had a thorough understanding of their environment and project, and consistently delivered the necessary results despite facing challenges. They fully embraced the core principles and values of their project and organization, enabling them to effectively navigate and resolve any difficulties they encountered.
If a project is to be discontinued as painful as it may seem based on effort and input from team and stakeholders. As a PM first a careful reviews of all the reasons for and against and coming up with the right approach and explanations for conciliation is necessary. I have seen projects being delayed for a month for safety reasons were lives with be greatly affected. So yes a project could be council if it will cause more harm to the environment and the eco-system,which in turn will impact on health and cost of the project
In my point of view after watching the video, what is important to them in taking the decision they took was the flair to completing Projects. Considering time, resources, commitment and effort invested on the project.
These three individuals took work ethics into account, understood their surroundings and the project they were working on perfectly, and made sure to deliver the required results despite any obstacles in their way. They were able to fully integrate the principles and values that underpin their project and organization, allowing them to find the best solution for whatever difficulty they find themselves in.
From the video seen, the experiences of three experts who navigated difficult decisions in a project shed light on the critical factors in their decision-making processes. Each expert emphasized the significance of considering diverse viewpoints, gathering pertinent data, and assessing the potential risks and benefits prior to making a decision. These elements enabled them to navigate challenging scenarios and make well-informed choices aligned with their project objectives.
Reflecting on whether these experts would act differently in a different context, it’s crucial to recognize that decision-making is influenced by the unique circumstances of each project. While the fundamental principles of information gathering and considering multiple perspectives remain constant, the specific context, stakeholders involved, and nature of the decision can vary significantly.
In another context, these experts might adjust their decision-making approach based on factors like the urgency of the situation, resource availability, and stakeholder collaboration levels. They could adapt their strategies and processes to address the distinct challenges and opportunities posed by each project environment.
Ultimately, the ability to flexibly apply sound decision-making principles is essential for navigating diverse project scenarios effectively. By learning from past experiences and remaining open to adjusting their approach, these experts can continue making informed decisions that contribute to project success, irrespective of the context.
Communications
Transparency
Consistency in practice
Dealing with difficult decisions requires a thoughtful and structured approach that balances ethical considerations, practical implications, and the interests of stakeholders. First, gather all relevant information and analyze the potential outcomes of each option. Consider the ethical principles involved, such as honesty, fairness, and respect for others’ rights. Engage with stakeholders to understand their perspectives and concerns. Weigh the pros and cons of each choice, taking into account both short-term and long-term consequences. Prioritize options that align with core values and ethical standards, while also considering feasibility and impact. Once a decision is made, communicate it clearly and transparently, explaining the rationale to those affected. Monitor the results of the decision and be open to adjustments if necessary.
1. Before termination of project, one must weigh both the cost of continuing and canceling the project
2. A way must be created to overcome the language barrier even if it requires to hire a translator.
3. When the necessity is not available, the available becomes the necessity which have mostly help out in project management and completion.
4. It’s not easy to bring back the interest of members who have lost interest in an ongoing project but it’s very important to find a way to make them have a rethink towards the completion of the project.
From my observation they all had to seat with all the stakeholders to resolve the issues. The resulting dialog resulted in solutions. In another context they would still have had to dialog to result issues and make the tough decisions.
It was important to all of them that the focus should be on achieving the goal while trying as much as possible to maintain cordiality and effectiveness. Even where the project has to be terminated, it is still critical to keep the goal in mind and constantly align decisions and solutions to problems with the project purpose in mind.
In different situations I think they’d have acted in similar ways but the response would necessarily be tailored to the peculiarity of the situation.
From my observation they all had to seat with all the stakeholders to resolve the issues. The resulting dialog resulted in solutions. In another context they would still have had to dialog to result issues and make the tough decisions.
Considering what was said by the managers, what I observed was the word communication. Sometimes, there may be a need to compromise but as a Project manager, the cost must be counted in other to ensure that it is a win win for both parties and the project itself it full achieved.
The decisions made by the three project managers depend on the goals of the project.
According to the first project manager, the early termination of a project is the most difficult decision to make. This is because team members and stakeholders have invested significant effort in the project. The decision to terminate may be made if the project is significantly over budget or if the costs outweigh the potential benefits. Stakeholder expectations and project feasibility are also factors that may lead to early termination.
In a different context, PMs may act differently based on the specific project, organizational priorities, and external factors.
While the second project manager employed more team members to accelerate project progress when he was faced with resource constraints.
In a different context, PMs may consider other alternative solutions, such as optimizing existing resources or adjusting project timelines, depending on the situation.
The last project manager mentioned that the most difficult decision he ever took was due to language barriers, which can impact project progress.
In a different context, PMs may prioritize language proficiency or explore technology-based communication tools.
Ultimately, the decisions made by the project managers were dependent on the specific context, project goals, and available information. It is important to consider all relevant factors and adapt decision-making strategies accordingly.
No doubt, every Project Manager will face one or two challenges in project and PMs must be ready to use diverse means in sorting them out. What was very important to the three experts that made them took the decision they took was the success of a project. Being successful in project plans and meeting the goal is the joy of every Project Manager. However, if there situations arises, PMs must count the cost, make concrete analysis to see if the project should continue or be cancelled. If a PM succeeded in counting the cost and continue the project, he has succeeded to add another badge to his feather and impact people with the project. If a PM succeeded in counting the cost and he realizes the project is not anywhere going to yield results and cancel the project early, he has also succeeded in diverting and avoiding the negativity the project can have on his organizations or beneficiary at large. Either ways, it’s a win win for a project manager
No one would want to start a project and not complete it, and the beauty of being a PM is when you are able to deliver that which is committed into your hands. You will continue to be relevant as PM to degree which you provide solutions to complex problems. Their intention to deliver as PM propelled them to take the decision.
And to answer if they would act differently in a different context, I will say yes! because they will have another set of stakeholder, client and possibly project team to deal with.. One of the PM explained how they had issue with with water and how it is being resolved. Two important steps he took is to gather people together for brainstorming and after which he was able to get contingency for the venue…. The case might not be the same in a different context.
Before terminating a project as a PM you must weigh both the cost of continuing and canceling the project
The experts wouldn’t have acted differently in another circumstance.
Because individuals have different ways of thinking about how an issue should be solved, one can only agree with the views of other stakeholders, by comparing everyone’s opinions, and then go with the ones that best solve the issue.
The organization also have their regulations on how things should go.
So, just like one of the experts said, they had to collaborate.
Collaborating with the organization and customers to resolve any issue that comes up is one of the keys to keeping the relationship between an organization and its customers.
For the three managers, these things stand even as they encounter challenges as Managers
Creating a balance by weighing the cost of continuation or termination of a project.
Overcoming language barriers for effective communication and impartation.
Sustaining members’ interest, as this could be hard to reclaim when lost. Creating engaging communication strategies that allow members to rethink their commitments and deepen their connection to the quality of service delivery.
Considering the rights’ of team members and engaging them on their perspectives to get well-rounded and effective delivery.
Being open to adjustments will allow team members to fully commit to the core values and overall service delivery of their projects.
All of the managers encountered challenges, but their major propeller is the the success of the project which was their target. Individual approach to each challenges encountered is keen.
According to the 3 experts that shared their difficulties, to me it’s the best thing they did to find a wayout…
1. Before termination of project, one must weigh both the cost of continuing and canceling the project
2. A way must be created to overcome the language barrier even if it requires to hire a translator.
3. When the necessity is not available, the available becomes the necessity which have mostly help out in project management and completion.
4. It’s not easy to bring back the interest of members who have lost interest in an ongoing project but it’s very important to find a way to make them have a rethink towards the completion of the project.
In general, to complete a project many sacrifices are done as a project manager.
Sometimes project scope may expand beyond the initial expectation. one challenge that arises from this is to decide if it still favors the goal of the project for the the work to continue. and if it were to continue what form of external input should be brought on board.
Dealing with difficult decisions requires a thoughtful and structured approach that balances ethical considerations, practical implications, and the interests of stakeholders. First, gather all relevant information and analyze the potential outcomes of each option. Consider the ethical principles involved, such as honesty, fairness, and respect for others’ rights. Engage with stakeholders to understand their perspectives and concerns. Weigh the pros and cons of each choice, taking into account both short-term and long-term consequences. Prioritize options that align with core values and ethical standards, while also considering feasibility and impact. Once a decision is made, communicate it clearly and transparently, explaining the rationale to those affected. Monitor the results of the decision and be open to adjustments if necessary.
Each project manager encounter challenges, but it’s their adaptability and flexibility that often spell the difference between success and failure. Despite facing difficult situations, they demonstrate resilience by shifting their focus from the problem at hand to crafting innovative solutions. By embracing change and adapting to unforeseen circumstances, they steer the project towards success, proving that obstacles are merely stepping stones on the path to achievement.
The decision to make the project a success was their driving force and They were focused on the project goals even though They had their different approaches in solving difficult issues.
In a different context, such as having more flexibility in resource management or access to alternative water sources, MTD might approach the situation differently.
If MTD had access to alternative water sources or could arrange for temporary water supply solutions (like water trucks or onsite storage), they might explore these options to continue project activities without major interruptions.
Improved water management practices, such as water recycling systems or efficient usage techniques, could help mitigate water supply challenges and support concurrent project activities.
Depending on project priorities and contractual obligations, MTD might prioritize water-intensive tasks for one project over another or adjust project timelines to optimize resource utilization.
The decision-making process would be influenced by the specific context, available resources, project timelines, contractual obligations, and stakeholder expectations.
Flexibility, adaptability, and proactive risk management can guide project managers and organizations in navigating unexpected challenges when handling projects.
Inability to state clearly project objectives and goals can lead to taking some difficult decision,such as termination of project. A good PM must get his/her plans ready, and clear enough to convince the client of success. No client will want to engage in fruitless venture. Once this is settled, difficult decision taken will always be for positive results of the ongoing project, such as re assigning of roles to each team members.
What was important to the project managers in the video was:
1. Focusing on the goal of the organization in accomplishing the given task
2. Collaborating with the team and stakeholders in order to achieve the set goal.
I believe every issue has its peculiarity and therefore requires different approaches in resolving it. Therefore, I would say that if they were face with a different situation they would have acted differently. However, focusing on the goal for each task and collaborating with the team and stakeholders is material to every situation.
In the video the three professional project manager focused more on their goals which lead to the success of the project.
The three experts where precisely focused on the organisational goals and prioritizing the goals of the organisation and being determine to achieve the goals no matter the odds made them successful. Also having clear communication with the team and involving stakeholders made it easier
In overcoming all the difficult situations faced by the project managers as all three discussed, the most entailing thing was the project goal and even if faced with a more peculiar case this is the main objective of the project which is the successful completion of the project. At such stating clear project objectives and goals help project managers overcome difficult situations with reasonable ease.
I noticed 3 important things about the 3 experts, the decision was the success of the project. They were focused on the project goals. They had their different approaches in solving difficult issues.
In difficult situations where there’s no straightforward answer or decision, the project manager has to ensure that the guiding factor behind his/her choice/decision is the success of the project. In different circumstances, different choices would need to be made while still ensuring the success of the project.
What was important for 3 experts in taking the decision was the success of the project. They were focused on the project goals. They had their different approaches in solving difficult issues. They were able to make the decision because of their transparency and clear communication with their teammates and stakeholders.
If they were found in a different situation, they will act differently because not all problems are the same, so approach cannot be the same.
I’ve learned from the three experienced Project Managers that a difficult decision often arises when there isn’t a straightforward, clear path forward. In such situations, there are multiple options available, each with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. However, as a Project Manager, it’s crucial to recognize that there’s always an alternative. Our primary objective is to deliver value within the designated timeframe or schedule, and navigating through these alternatives is a fundamental aspect of achieving that goal.
As a project manager, circumstances towards a project could differ but identifying the right strategy to approach them is relevant.
Basically, the ultimate goal of a project manager is to meet a success at the end, so each situation could probably have their own different way of sorting, and the PM’s ability to think like the teammates and the stakeholders could go a long way
One of the things that was important for the Project managers was the positive outcome of what ever decision they had to take, either aborting a project they just started or finding an extra solution to an already existing one or having to come to terms in communication with the stakeholders despite the disparity in languages.
The three experts all had different approaches to solving the difficult issues. And I think one of the general factors of the three is the ability to communicate with both their team mates and the stakeholders. As a project manager, we should be able to tackle difficult situations in a very calm way. Ability to compromise and be patient with team members is also essential. A project manager should also be honest, ensure you relay the reason for any change to both team members and stakeholders in clear term.
The experts’ decisions were influenced by the specific project context, including constraints, objectives, and external factors. Depending on different contexts, such as available resources, deadlines, budget, and market conditions, their decision-making may vary to align with the unique circumstances at hand. Flexibility and adaptability are key traits in decision-making, allowing experts to navigate various contexts effectively
Project managers have a unique approach in terms of decision-making. this depends on the current matter at hand. the three experts each had to make a difficult decision to continue or discontinue their projects. project manager should be open and communicate effectively to ensure the feedback collected can be of help in the next project.
Circumstances and the nature of the project determine the action of the project manager. Many things affect the decisions taken by a project manager- financial resources, social, climatic factors as well as cultural factors. The ability to adapt to change,and if necessary, develop a contingency plan, makes a project manager capable of handling whatever challenge(s) faced at every point in time.
Another factor to be considered is the response from the stakeholders to the changes observed in the execution of the project. Once the project manager informs the stakeholder (s) of the challenge(s), the response obtained will also determine the next course of action to be taken.
These three experts all had different experiences that required them to act in different ways. As a project manager, the decisions you make on different projects will differ. A project manager should always be prepared to make decisions, even difficult ones, which would ultimately help them achieve the goal or goals of the project which is the most important. A project manager should be open to collaborations and compromise and also be able to be transparent and honest while communicating effectively.
The main goal for each of them was achieving the main goal of the project which they did, despite the hurdles and setbacks. I think they would ascot the say way if in a different context, because like I said the main aim is to get the job done, have contingency plans ahead and making sure they are stated clearly and everyone understands.
A project manager has to take decisions which is usually based on the issues or situations at a particular project at the time,the key is to be able to compromise and find the most favorable option for all the parties involved. it is also necessary to pull the plug on the project if that is the best route to take for all the stakeholders involved in the project.
A project manager might have to act differently than they did in the past, that is because every project is different no matter how similar it may be, and also the priority level of the project at the time.
They had to act differently because each of them has well-outlined specific goals they had to achieve, bearing in mind they are serving in different capacities, and the decisions each makes have an impact on the overall project goals. That is why teamwork and diversity come into play here.
I think they all make the right decision as a project manager, which helps the team achieve success at the end of the project.
Project managers act differently based on the situation on ground, every challenge is unique, the response to the challenge should be based on what’s to be done to achieve the set goal. It about carrying stakeholders along and managing resources effectively.
The most important things is getting the project done safely and timely. Despite the issues or difficulties encountered, they all discussed, found solution and moved ahead
Nobody want wish to terminate a project because you have wasted a lots of time but meeting with the team concerning a difficult deal and manage it is a good decision
One thing that was important was the best way forward at ensuring the project continues and there is value delivered. The ability of a project manager to handle impediments is key which was what they did.
What is important is ego be dropped when discussing to find solution to a situation.
All parties involved must come to round table to discuss about the steps to take to find solution to the problem.
The PM must come to the level of the team
what was important for them in each situation was the project. They were all focused on the project goals and found solutions to problems that might hinder achieving this goals.
if they were found in a different situation i think they will act differently because not all problems are the same so the approach cannot be the same.
These experts faced a tough choice. They had clear goals, but it wasn’t easy to solve the problems. Nobody wants to end a project early, especially when others have put in a lot of effort. They tried to prevent setbacks with safety measures, but if those didn’t work, they had no choice but to stop the project.
Now, to the question of whether they’d act differently in another situation, the answer is yes. There could be many reasons for terminating the project, like not enough resources, natural disasters, or even the sponsor’s decision. In a different situation, they might have made a different, better choice.
These three expert have thought and goals laid out for them. In case of early termination project, it could not be easy because of the time, efforts, resources and manpower put into the project. Like she readily said, the termination also, resulted to positive and negative feedback. Also, on one point, they have to compromise. Language barrier is also put difficulties in decision making.
What is more important to a PM is to always lead the mind of the team or stakeholders towards the goal as well as ensuring serene workspace. i.e ensuring that the team are in their good state of mind.
Its also important to find a safe landing towards every decision as far as that decision would the compromise the core goal of the organisation/project.
These three experts are on top of the discussions. They had their goals well planned for. they didn’t give up and one of them mentioned termination of a project, it is assumed that their was no other option for her to choose termination of project.
On the issue of termination of contract, I think another route ought to have been taken. Actually, i do not know what led to the termination but if it is a default from the client, it could lead to litigation because the contractor must have purchased a bond, mobilise, etc except if the project was terminated at the planning level
These experts are at the top of their discussion making ladders although hard and difficult to decide but will with the help of communication and transparency in achieving a common goal
These experts were at the top of their decisions making ladder, although difficult yet engaging in communication and transparency in resolving their issues to attain organisation goals.
These experts made the right decisions based on the situation at hand. They also did well in being transparent and communicating the current situation to their stakeholders. I also observed that in every project, free flow of communication is very important especially in international projects.
The three were good in their decisions though difficult but Employing communication and transparency in resolving their issues to attain organisation goals.
The experts had their goals well plans. Their challenges were tackled differently. Communication, effectiveness and willing to collaborate always with their team members is key.
Terminating a project is one difficult decision for every project manager. The 3 PM’s acted differently based on their experience
The three PMs acted differently and have their goals outlined in mind to achieve in their different projects. They have play with effective communication with all stakeholders to make a final decision.
The three experts all very good at their jobs had moments where they were tested and from the video, they overcome. They communicated with their stakeholders, peers, clients and their team. Yes some of the decisions they made probably wasn’t to everyone’s liking but they understood it’s logical point of view.
The experts had their goal intact and they didn’t let the distractions and challenges they had to tackle alongside got them Carried away
So effective communication played a very good role here in achieving the success
EZE JACINTA OGECHUKWU
COHORT 14
TEAM 4
These experts did so well in the decision making process while dealing with difficult decisions.
They had different goals per project plan as such, each expert required diverse skills ranging from communication ( the foundation; with or without language barrier) to empathy, collaboration, time management, risk management among others putting the pros and cons into consideration all to favour the success of the projects.
The three experts differently and have their goals outlined and the most important is communication,they communicate to tackle the thing on ground.
Dealing with difficult decision is one thing a project manager has to deal with but reflecting on the most important objective of the project is very important in other for them to achieve their goal.
Also,clear and consistent communication with stakeholders should remain ethical while making decisions.
The three project manager would react differently in different situation because each situation requires different approach.
The three expert PMs acted differently and have their goals outlined in mind to achieve in their different projects.
These experts did so well in the decision making process while dealing with difficult decisions.
They had different goals per project plan as such, each expert required diverse skills ranging from communication ( the foundation; with or without language barrier) to empathy, collaboration, time management, risk management among others putting the pros and cons into consideration all to favour the success of the projects.
They had to act differently because each of them has well-outlined specific goals they had to achieve, bearing in mind they are serving in different capacities, and the decisions each makes have an impact on the overall project goals. That is why teamwork and diversity come into play here.
The best approach to resolve and take difficult decisions is to be transparent and ensure adherence to laid down rules and regulations. Additionally, a project manager must be seen to be leading by example.
Time management was one of the difficulties faced by the first project manager this made me have a reflection of our previous module on proper planning in other to meet up on time in handling project.
positivity in team work is of necessity once the team members are positive that a particular goal will be achieved all efforts will be put into achieving the goal .
making the right decision as a project manager, helps the team achieve success at the end of the project.
Looking at the decisions the three project managers had to take, you could say that they had no other choice.
Having a viable project is more important than sticking to the initial plan or cost.
Pulling the plug on a project has to be a very difficult decision especially when time and energy has gone into it. Nevertheless it was a right decision as the project my not be useful after completion.
The capacity to communicate with teammates and stakeholders was crucial to their success, especially in the face of a situation that appeared difficult and demanding due to the intricacy of striking a balance between a number of competing interests, deadlines, resource limitations, and possible hazards.
For the 3 project managers, several key factors were important:
Clear Objectives: Understanding the project’s goals and objectives is crucial for making decisions that align with the project’s overall direction.
Stakeholder Input: Considering the perspectives and needs of stakeholders helps ensure that decisions take into account diverse viewpoints and potential impacts.
Risk Assessment: Evaluating potential risks and uncertainties allows project managers to anticipate challenges and make decisions that mitigate negative consequences.
Data and Information: Basing decisions on accurate and relevant data enhances their effectiveness and reduces the likelihood of making decisions based on assumptions or incomplete information.
Communication: Effective communication with team members, stakeholders, and other relevant parties is essential for conveying decisions, gathering input, and maintaining transparency throughout the decision-making process.
Flexibility: Being adaptable and open to adjusting decisions as new information emerges or circumstances change enables project managers to respond effectively to unexpected challenges.
Project managers may indeed act differently in different contexts due to factors such as the nature and complexity of the project, the organizational culture, the availability of resources, and external influences such as market conditions or regulatory requirements.
Yes the three project manager expertises will of courses act differently
1.Environment
2. Stakeholders involved in the project
3. The deadline
4.funding etc
Now these variables can effect there reasons and the way they act,
Environment is a strong hold in a project hence it might effect the project negatively or positively thereby affecting the way they act or will react to it
Stakeholders are another strong hold while carrying out a project, their decisions might affect the way the expertises react or handle the project
Lastly funding, funding is another thing to consider when carrying out a project, this might also affect the way these experts reacts
Having to terminate a project is actually a tough decision.
Just like the narration of other project manager….
Technical issues, higher priority jobs, challenges of venue
My most painful reason to terminate a project was the indecision of the client.
When we had to go back and forth foe reasons not worth it yet the client is not willing to make compensations.
All 3 PMs would act differently in a different context because a lot of variables involved would have changed and need to be taken in to consideration. Variables like the project, the environment, the stakeholders involved, the different problems that might arise during the course of the project. These would require their responses and decisions to be tailored to the specific parameters surrounding that project.
Dealing with difficulty decision.
3 experts have described difficult decisions they had to take in one project. Now think about what was important for them in taking the decision the took.
I think what was more important to the 3 project managers are the priority of the project, the goals of the project and achieving this goals within its set time and budget
Would they have at differently in a different contexts and why
I personally believe their decisions would be based on the uniqueness of the problem that they encounter when carrying out a project and they wouldn’t have acted differently seeing they all made compromises, coming up with different alternatives to deal with the issues and at the end of the said projects everyone was happy with the outcome.
A Project Manager should be a proactive person so as to assuage situations that could turn messy and which could tarnish his integrity. So if nipping in the bud is the saviour for such, then it is advisable to go for it after considering both negative and positive sides well.
Since this is not an act of cowardice, in different situations, these PMs would have taken different actions.
I think, based on my understanding, decisions are made based on the circumstances at hand. And having listened to the three experts, they are much more concerned about project goals set before the project started, with a clear focus on the goals.
They had to act differently because each of them has well-outlined specific goals they had to achieve, bearing in mind they are serving in different capacities, and the decisions each makes have an impact on the overall project goals. That is why teamwork and diversity come into play here.
A Project Manager should be a proactive person so as to assuage situations that could turn messy and which could tarnish his integrity. So if nipping in the bud is the saviour for such, then it is advisable to go for it after considering both negative and positive sides well.
Since this is not an act of cowardice, in different situations, these PMs would have taken different actions.
Dealing with difficult decisions as a project manager involves carefully evaluating the situation, and considering various factors such as project constraints, contingencies, stakeholder interests, and ethical considerations. It requires effective communication, collaboration, and problem-solving skills to explore alternatives, weigh the potential risks and benefits, and make informed decisions that align with project objectives and values. Additionally, seeking input from relevant stakeholders and seeking guidance from experienced mentors or subject matter experts can help navigate challenging situations and mitigate adverse impacts on the project.
The of the PM expert mentioned there experiences and there are whole lots of lessons to learn from them The goal of a project manager is to ensure that the project is completed successfully, on time, and within budget. This involves a number of different tasks. It’s also important to communicate effectively with all stakeholders, and to resolve any issues that arise in a timely manner.
The of the PM expert mentioned there experiences and there are whole lots of lessons to learn from them The goal of a project manager is to ensure that the project is completed successfully, on time, and within budget. This involves a number of different tasks. It’s also important to communicate effectively with all stakeholders, and to resolve any issues that arise in a timely manner.
The three professional PM made me realize that to tackle a difficult decision as a PM is not to dwell on the decision but to get another alternative to get the project done. Making inquiries and getting more information can help you settle some decisions that are very difficult to make
Listening to the three project manager sharing their experience has been enlightening and also shows that situations may arise when difficult decisions must be made by a project manager in the cause of a project but what really matters is your approach to decision making.
Here we see that though the context were different being transparent and communication skills came in handy in bringing about solution.
We also see collaboration in play and the focus on the overall goal of the project, going back to the drawing board to remind stakeholders, and clients on the actual goal of the project and explaining in honesty the situation and why certain decisions must be made while allowing them go be part of the decision process in the sense that they all get an understanding as to why this decisions are important the pros and cons .
From the three difficult situations experienced by the project managers, I can say that what stood out was the ability to make decisions without sentiments and to take actions that were going to be of benefit to the entire company. Also, making inquiries and seeking more information and guidance on how to handle the situation will not be out of place.
Itodo Jennifer Ezinne
Each of these project managers mentioned their respective difficulties they encountered during a project, what was important for them was the communication between stakeholders, the team and themselves as a project manager and to derive a solution and give feedback to all people /parties involved in the project.
These approaches remain applicable in addressing issues even within a different context, nevertheless, all other approaches that align with the given context should be considered and implemented.
Each of these project managers mentioned their respective difficulties they encountered during a project, what was important for them was the communication between stakeholders, the team and themselves as a project manager and to derive a solution and give feedback to all people /parties involved in the project.
These approaches remain applicable in addressing issues even within a different context, nevertheless, all other approaches that align with the given context should be considered and implemented.
Each of these expert mentioned their respective difficulties they encountered during the project. What was important for them was the communication between the stakeholders, the team and themselves as the project manager and to derive a solution and give feedback to all people /parties involved in the project.
The situation at hand will help us know how to tackle such situation, for the woman, it was the decision to terminate the project early, maybe as result of some factors or that there’s an higher project at hand that won’t make the current project to be feasible.
Language barrier is another aspect that need to be tackled when handling international project.
I believe the decision they will act on will be unique to the problem that they encounter in carrying out the project. Also as project managers, they need to be calm in face of difficult situations.
Each of the experts addressed the respective difficulty encountered in the course of the project as deemed suitable given the context of the situation. Two major similarities in their approach to dealing with the respective situations was effective communication with the parties involved in the execution of the project as well as ensuring that the goal for which the project was initiated is achieved. These approaches remain applicable in addressing issues even within a different context, nonetheless, all other approaches that align with the given context should be considered and implemented.
The goal of the project should always be considered at all stages of its execution, and where there are tough decisions to be made due to difficulties encountered, some form of flexibility should be deployed.
The decision-makers weighed various factors such as project goals, team capabilities, client expectations, budget constraints, and long-term project outcomes. Their decisions were influenced by the specific context of the project, including timelines, resources, and stakeholder priorities. In different contexts with altered parameters, they might indeed act differently to align with the new circumstances and priorities.
Most of the time dealing with difficult people is difficult more so, when they are aggrieved. She did well in calming the different parties and having them focus on the goal
In the remote remote work set up, language is a very big challenge and it’s always important to manage communication with diverse group of people.
When a vital project team member beings to give issues which might affect the goals of the project.
As a project manager at the moment you know option than to discharge such a member, if it is what it might cost to ensure that the project goals are meet.
The context in which decisions are made has a profound impact on organizational behavior. While prioritizing innovation and cultural transformation in the current context, different circumstances could prompt alternative decisions shaped by varying priorities, risks, and constraints.
They won’t. The decisions was solely needed at that time
This situation clearly says that as a project manager, you are there to solve problems not matter how complex they appear except you have tried all available options and it’s not yielding result is when you’ll have to take the difficult decision of pulling out on the job also clearly stating your reasons with stakeholders so they understand with you or help find a way around it.
Different challenges come to play during projects but the way we handle it matters a lot. Communicating with the team members is very key at this point There should be room for adjustment in any project development. Which means a project manager should be able to compromise and also find ways to make the project successful inspite of whatever challenges encountered during the project.
Even in situations that requires compromise, the project manager should focus more on the success of a project. Also, when the trust a project manager has built over time with stakeholders and sponsors of the project will make it easy to communicate better on the project at hand,
*Dealing with difficult decisions -Discussion*
Project manager need to be able to compromise. Their set goal at all times should find a way to go ahead with the project at hand irrespective of the challenges faced with while on the project. It is not always easy for a project manager to terminate a the ongoing project as a lot of efforts has been invested. For instance, when you get stocked up in a project rather than terminating it, you have to diversify means of solving it, like the expect that brought water to the event center by paying for the contingencies which now served as a legacy.
As a project manager, there are situations which requires compromise.
The project managers at different times experienced the ups and down aspect of managing a project. But they focused more on the success of the project. They made sure, the team members and stakeholders were able to put resources and efforts together to achieve their objectives.
Our approach most times to difficult/unforseen situations matters, all the managers had different situations at hand but their approach were topnotch, certain challenges needs an immediate response while there are some that a manager has to call on his team, where they discuss and agree on what to do to attend to the challenges.
Seldom do we get to work on a project where we get everything we want, and everyone agrees on the work. Most of the time leading a project involves several conversations and compromises. Sometimes the key stakeholders will want the impossible. Other times they may be shooting too low. If you have built a good relationship, it becomes easier to have open honest conversations with your stakeholders. They’ll listen to your opinion and allow for flexibility in meeting the project goals.
For most of us, the project sponsor is the senior business leader who has invested in your project. Oftentimes project leaders will think of the sponsor as “the person with the checkbook” and treat them as such. With this approach, one can unintentionally assume that the sponsor only wants to hear about what’s going well. I’ve seen more than one project manager hide challenges and try to resolve them on their own just to keep the sponsor happy. A good project manager may operate this way for years and do just fine. However, moving from good to great takes a different approach.
To help your projects go great, leverage the three concepts (trust, communication, and understanding) to build a better relationship with your sponsors. Share what goes well and what doesn’t. Sponsors will oftentimes have the relationships in an organization to “pull some strings” and help remove any obstacles in the way of your project.
I believe what was important for them in the decision they took were as follows:
1. the cons of continuing a project out weighed the pros and this had to be communicated clearly to all the stakeholders involved to get their buy in
2. When faced with the challenge of looming failure with a project it was necessary to reach a compromise in finding a solution and the willingness to take on extra costs just for the project to achieve its objective
3. the need for collaboration was a motivation to overcome the language barrier.
They would act differently in a different context because different situations calls for different actions but I believe they would still have acted in line with their values.
They all did what they thought was best at that point in time. Especially that of communication barrier.. communication covers over 80% percent of project management as a profession and there is no way you could function as a project manager without an effective communication. So I think the best way to handle that is either to get an interpreter or terminate the project
No.they wouldn’t act differently in different context because they were acting according to the values of their profession.
Dealing with difficult decisions – Discussion
1. The difficult decision made by Cathy Shaw was the decision to terminate a project early.
2. The Difficult decision made by Emanuele Colomella was that of Language having to work with an intenational company
3. The difficult decision for Bill Wooten was the sporting event continuing as scheduled after knowing the issue of water supply
In dealing with difficult situations, project managers must allow for flexibility in handling issues. Dogmatic leaders tend to make great mistakes on a project.
Relationship with customers, colleagues and stakeholders generally is very important and some good compromises must be allowed as long as it does not nullify their ethics.
The gains of every project are different, when challenges occur, you think of all cost, think of all stakeholders interests and the best alternative considering all alternatives forgone. This will help make informed decision.
Involving every member of the project will bring out the best for the project because everyone will bring his idea for the betterment of the job, also having good communication skills helps in handling difficult situation
I think terminating a project while still in process will have effects on the project team because they’ve left other things to engage the project. Not forgetting the client because i know there should be a good reason terminating the project.
As to the termination before a project was fully delivered, I believe the decisions of the stakeholder- particularly the sponsor – was considered. Since there is aboslute inclusiveness, I believe the entire team has been clearly engaged and would feel less discouragement during the termination.
They considered the alternative foregone if the project will have to stay or be terminated and weighed the pros and cons, clearly spelt it out to their teams for easy disengagement.
Negotiation skills come in heavy in these scenarios so that all parties go back satisfied no matter the outcome.
I think they may have acted differently in a different context because different situations call for different approaches.
What was important for them in taking the decision they took was;
1. The ability to dictate how to handle the problem and taking critical decision to achieve goal without being discourage.
2. Ability to accept extra cost in expense of failure. If goal will be achieved but still within budget, then it’s a step worth taking.
3. The thought of collaboration was very key. That gave and alternative venue and also intermediator in communication.
Yes they will act differently in different context.
Reason been that. Every context has its own challenges and must have different approach. Because same issue in different context may demand different approach reason been that people, culture, values and many more ethics varies with context.
Communicating decisions clearly to your team, understanding project goals and the people involved is key.
It might be quite challenging to make a difficult decision on the project you are managing buh I guess it’s for the best if it will be the best option of both the project and the individual. The three individuals handle the situation well. There wouldn’t have been a better way
Wouldn’t have act differently they did well in managing emotions of stakeholders
While it may be challenging to make difficult decisions in a project, it’s necessary for effective project management. I believe that all three project managers acted appropriately in the situation. When having to end a project before it is delivered, the ability to collaborate, communicate, and view things in a positive light comes into play. Bringing all team members and stakeholders along is essential when managing a project, just like the first project manager did by sharing the concerns and then working together to find a solution to the water source issue.
To me, I picked one important point, which is communication. For every step they always make sure they communicate and they issues are kinds similar but resolution method differs.
When facing challenges or issues that might lead to conflict or project termination, its best to try and communicate, try easing the whole situation, identifying minor issues, listening to each members of the team to avoid partial judgments and also the project manager should show leadership qualities which would help put back everyone and the project back on track.
When facing conflict leading to potential project termination, the project manager should apply strong mediation and conflict resolution skills. This involves active listening, fostering open communication among team members, identifying underlying issues, negotiating compromises, and seeking win-win solutions. Additionally, the manager should demonstrate leadership, empathy, and adaptability to navigate through the conflict and steer the project back on track.
The three managers faced difficult decisions ranging from early termination of project, conflicting or opposition projects or organization, and language barrier.
I making decisions the three of them had to consider their projects, team and their sponsors hence, had to go back to negotiations table/ communication table to find a common ground they all found common grounds (compromise) while considering their projects goals which let to them living a remarkable impacts with amicable resolutions.
In order to successfully deliver a project, communication is necessary and what help the expert to deliver well is they communicate promptly, when you get stocked up in a project rather than terminating it, you have to diversify means of solving it, like the expect that brought water to the event center.
Communication is the key because without them concluding on a project to Carry out, it will be very difficult to finish.
Because it helps to have the total knowledge about the project and the kind of clients you are working with.
In my opinion the three project managers acted well in responses to their various difficulty experienced in various tasks.
1. The important consideration for Cathy Shaw was the viability of the project. When she encountered lack of trust in the team, she reminded them of why the project was important and they were able to proceed. She would have acted differently if the issues were technical in nature and the project would have become less viable in view of technological advancements. She would rather have terminated the project.
2. The important consideration to Emanuele Colomella was the fact that it was an international project involving stakeholders from different countries and his ability to consistently communicate with all of them was what made the project continue. He might have acted differently if there was no language barrier among the stakeholders.
3. The important consideration for Bill Wooten was the sporting event continuing as scheduled. He negotiated a mutually beneficial outcome and gave a concession in a contingency plan for the venue, although this caused the project to overshoot it’s budget. I do believe that if there were other cheaper options for getting water to the venue, he would have taken it, or if the water had been highlighted as a major consideration at the time of venue selection, another venue might have been chosen for the sporting event.
The 3 experts understood that what was more important was delivering the project in good condition and on time.
Also, they knew that there would be setbacks but one thing to have in mind is to remember the goals and for them to be transparent.
Communication is a major priority and for everyone to be on the same page it has to be properly communicated so that at the end of the day there is a mutual understanding.
Every project comes with its own challenges.
Communication is the key to solving all problems, communication plays an important role. When there’s an effective communication between project managers, stakeholder and every other person involve in the project, some problems get solved even before they arise because solution measures will be available.
What was important to them was getting the project delivered well and on time.
But most importantly know all that a project entails before embarking on it, communicate and deliberate on confusing issues with stakeholders and team members, ask questions for clarity anywhere you’re confused.
In my opinion, the 3 experts handled the situations excellently well. One key thing I understood from this is that communication remains the most important skill of a Project Manager. The ability to understand a project goal and the people involved in it, and also be able to communicate and manage them effectively can not be over emphasized.
I believe the 3 experts have the understanding of the project at hand so as to work together without any issue, communication is the key because without them concluding on a particular things the work will be difficult to carry out. As a project manager, communicating with the team members is very essential to attain great achievement.
Having background information about a project one want to embark on is very imperative, and proper communication with team members is another thing to consider before commencement of any project.
UBONG EKANEM
It is very crucial and necessary to have a full knowledge of the project you want to carry out before starting it because it will help in making the appropriate decisions for the project. And also a project manager should always communicate with the team members when necessary.
It is necessary to have a full knowledge about the project and environment before starting a project.
During difficult situations, staying focus is a factor that will really help in scaling through while effective communication with team can also be use to solve difficulties
It is important to have a background information when working with some group of people, this will help to understand some of the reason for their decision or reactions. It is also important to stay focus in achieving a project goals and sometime you have to go extra miles as a project manager to leave behind a good reputation. Effective communication is important when dealing with divers people.
Adeyemi Adedokun
In handling or dealing with difficult situation, project manager need to look very carefully at that situation, so as not to make wrong decision that will affect every stake HOlDERS. In order to make proper and right decisions project managers must master communication skills, that is letting evey stakeholders know the reasons for such decisions….
Communication in the context of project management can not be over emphasis, because it is very vital…
Effects and impacts of communication can not be over-emphasized as it has been from the beginning of the this training, and as portrayed in the video.Which means as a project manager, effective communication should be as important as air to ensure sustenance of business
Thank you DEXA for bringing this awesome opportunity to us ,from the three instances listed above ,in each context ,they handled the situations very well ,like it should be handled . Learning a particular language to ease communication,that is a very good way to go.
As a project manager effective communication is crucial in making the project a success with your team members also.
Understanding the task at hand and executing them appropriately being honest and transparent.
As a PM, having thorough understanding of the situation at hand and good communication as a vital role, adding with transparency is a key role to handling resources and human in your team.
Communication is the key and vital role which acted like the centre pillar for every project manager. Honesty and transparency must not be excluded as you carry your project team alongside the stakeholders during the project exercise. ~Julius
In dealing with difficult decisions ,PM must have a thorough understanding of the situation on ground and also communication is key and is power of managing projects, managing human being and resources.
The three project managers had difficult challenges as regards to communication barrier, termination of project, technical issues, unavailability of resources and communicating this with the stakeholders and team members would go a long way to resolve the issue on ground. This shows professionalism and transparency. Every project comes with its own challenges and communication plays an important role.
What was important to them as a project manager was communication. The first PM had to communicate effectively with the workers to ease the anger. The second PM had to discuss with the clients to see how the difficulty on the ground could be solved and concluded.
Yes, they would have acted differently in a different context if they were probably sales representative or human resource manager
The three expert project managers were all serious in the project, despite everyone’s challenge in the project such in regard to resources available, technical issues and communication barriers. They kept moving on until they had fruitful discussions with different stakeholders involved in the project. That shows how professional project managers might prioritise the organisation goals rather than considering personal feelings in the decision making process. The PM have to adapt themselves to the difficulties they encounter, and seek a win-win solution every time.
What was important to them as a project manager was communication. Thr first Pm had to communicate effectively with the workers so as to ease the anger come to a conclusion. The second PM had to discuss with the clients to see how the difficulty on ground can be solved and concluded.
Yes, they would have acted differently in a different context if they are probably sales representative or human resource manager
The most important thing for me here is effective communication. If they had communicated to their clients, they would have done things differently
In terminating a project early than the anticipated time, the PM needed to have brought all stakeholders onboard to align and get their feedback.
PM should act in a way they contribute to the success of their project to show commitment to the job and leadership
How could this be mitigated?
Project managers could work alongside the team to show their own willingness to work overtime and during festivities.
Making additional services and facilities available for team members with families who may appreciate arrangements such as babysitting and transport services to make up for longer working hours.
Awarding additional days off at the end of the project, as compensation for the demanding commitments of the project.
Understanding is key . Understanding the stakeholders and their needs and also the decision they are making or have made in respect to the project at hand during difficult situations also ability to communicate effectively to other key players
When navigating challenging discussions, prioritizing communication with all cross-functional team members is essential.
For terminating a project early ;the project manager in consultation with the donor and the project team can look for local community based organizations that have the capacity of taking over the implementation and use the available funding in building the capacity of the very local based organizations.
For inability to deliver;the organization should hold a standard of 75% capacity to the party given the responsibility to deliver a particular service and conduct a pre-visit to conduct an audit of the capacity to deliver
For the project managers, I believe what was important for them in taking those decisions was if after all is said and done, is if everything is still aligned to the project goal that was set at the start.
Options to either continue a project, terminate or change course must be clearly set out to enable all stakeholders deliberate before a decision will be made and communication is key for this to happen.
And yes, the project managers could have acted differently in different scenarios because each situation is unique and will need different skills, methods and techniques to handle it.
Basically in any PM setting, open communication with all stakeholder is very key. Its the responsibility of the P. Manager to set the tone at the onset of the Project in this regard. Thereafter outlining in very clear terms the purpose and the deliverables of the project is essential. Once the project objective is clear then working in concert towards the common goal is half solved. Along the line in case project variation arises bringing disagreement on its trail, its easier to navigate the terrain by reaching out to the initial project goal ( the project road map) for fine tuning, adjustment or amendment so long conviviality of communication, respect and trust reign.
In the terminating of any project, the PM firstly should have communicated with the specialist team members, community representatives and one else who knows and understands the effect of the challenge(s) before the PM communicates with the client relating the challenges and the reason(s) why the project termination is the best solution.
At all time, in handling difficulties in different scenarios, the key factor should be “understanding” the difficulties on ground and possible ways to fix them. Understanding would give room to a better report to the necessary members of the team. The focal point for me would just be, in writing or verbally, always communicate with understanding, listen to understand and always make sure you understand and also, you’re being understood.
Understanding is key in dealing with difficult situations. Seek to understand the stakeholders involved and the reason for the decisions they made or are making. This would enable you to deal well with the outcomes.
Before making a decision, gather as much relevant information as possible. This may involve consulting team members, stakeholders, subject matter experts, and relevant documentation to fully understand the situation. For instance, a project may have reduced priority and resources may need to be deployed elsewhere or maybe prevailing events may have made the project no longer feasible. Whichever way pulling the plug on a project tough call.
My humble opinion is that in a different situation the difficult decision that well
Managed by the three experts would have met with a different approach or response if they lack project management skills to handle such situation
When navigating challenging discussions, prioritizing communication with all cross-functional team members is essential. Emphasizing the benefits over the drawbacks while aligning with the project’s overarching goals fosters a constructive approach to problem-solving.
Communication is the key factor here, and in your communication, be transparent with the stakeholders.
I think that having engaged in robust and effective communication with stakeholders, canceling a project might tend to be the very last option. However, having a plan B from the very start of the project seems to be an alternative lifesaver to canceling the project that has been commenced.
Cancelling a project could be a difficult decision to make, taking into consideration the resources already expended on the project. That said, if the goal of the project is not met, the project could be cancelled. As a project manager, you will need to properly engage and communicate clearly with the team members’ reasons behind every decision made. Of course, as with every aspect of human endeavours, there could be vital lessons where the team members can learn and used to improve the processes in future projects.
Proactive engagement and collaboration with stakeholders could be helpful when dealing with difficult decisions during project execution. Such engagements will bring everyone on board so that there will be no surprises when difficult decisions are made.
Listening to the experts, I understand that having a honest and transparent conversation with the stakeholders is the right thing to do.
Communicating effectively and efficiently with your team and stakeholders
Building integrity and having honest relationships with stakeholders
Being receptive and adaptable to change.
Also, don’t let your ego bring you down as humility is vital
The key point that helped them was ability to communicate with stakeholders and Teammates, even when the situation looked daunting and challenging due to the complexity of balancing various factors such as stakeholder interests, resource constraints, timelines, and potential risks.
Listening to this, I can boldly say that making decisions is challenging due to the complexity of balancing various factors such as stakeholder interests, resource constraints, timelines, and potential risks. Each decision carries significant implications for project outcomes, making the process inherently difficult and requiring careful consideration to mitigate potential consequences and ensure project success.
Making tough decisions
It’s difficult to oversee a project manager. Managing people and situations that are challenging is part of this. In a challenging scenario, every project manager has to make important choices. While viewing things from various angles, different actions should be done. Nonetheless, in order to achieve a shared understanding, project team managers ought to work together with project stakeholders.
In a project life cycle, there are times when PMs are faced with the task of dealing with difficult decision making. PM should always collaborate with all stakeholders and teams involved in that project , this can be made possible through effective and concise communication, the decision made together will bring a level of satisfaction to all the parties involved.
Decisions to terminate projectsbare quite good since they were able to properly solutions for those terminations.
Their solutions was also alright with the sponsors that’s why they were able to move on despite the extra costs that was incurred.
This 3 people put the ethics of their work into consideration and had a perfect understanding of their environment as well as the perfect understanding of the project they had to face and they ensured to deliver appropriately regardless of the surrounding challenges. They had been able to imbibe the values and morals guiding their organization and project which enables them to find a perfect way out of the circumstances or situations they find themselves.
The decision to terminate a project prematurely, while potentially disappointing, does not equate to wasted knowledge. As a project manager, it is essential to use effective knowledge management processes, ensuring that skills, tools, and techniques are not lost in the realm of knowledge. The decision to terminate a project early is carefully evaluated, taking into account various factors such as project objectives, schedule baseline, scope baseline, and more.
Flexibility and willingness to compromise are crucial traits for a project manager, especially when it comes to appeasing disgruntled stakeholders. However, it is important to maintain a focus on meeting project objectives. Communication channels and style play a vital role in project success, and it is the duty of the project manager to find effective solutions and navigate these aspects accordingly.
Larry Ganrekeme Ayapaye
Cohort 13
Team 8
Module 2 lesson 19
However, the decision a project manager would take depends on the circumstances surrounding the project.
For instance, a project manager cannot continue with a project which its sponsors have pulled out of. Of course the project belongs to the sponsor who also is funding it and when the sponsor decides not to continue, the PM would have no choice but the end the project.
Dealing with difficult and uncomfortable situation is one of the things a project manager should be prepared handle and in some cases you have to come to a compromise, you may have to decide to terminate a project early after weighing the pros and cons of continuing the project.
Project management like other professions has its ups and downs. It calls on the project manager to determine how to handle such difficult situations.
Decision whether difficult or simple should be communicated before or after the stakeholders
making difficult decisions have always been some of the key roles of a project manager. also prioritization of resources and also effective communications with the project team and the stakeholders would ensure a quick solutions to whatever blocks comes up along the project. these attributes were well demonstrated by the Project managers in the video
This 3 people put the ethics of their work into consideration and had a perfect understanding of their environment as well as the perfect understanding of the project they had to face and they ensured to deliver appropriately regardless of the surrounding challenges. They had been able to imbibe the values and morals guiding their organization and project which enables them to find a perfect way out of the circumstances or situations they find themselves.
Like every endeavor in life faces challenges, project management is not insulated from its own ups and downs. It calls on the project manager to determine how to handle such difficult situations. The decision-making and analytical skill of the manager will be critical at this start whether to continue a project or to pull the plug.
Complex and ambiguous challenges faced during a project process can make difficult to judge if a manager makes the right decision as such situations are unique and particular. such decisions are made on the go after considering all the facts. Every difficult challenge will require its own unique solution as dimmed fit by the project manager in the saddle.
These project managers are skilled in decision making, and this was the most relevant factor needed to mitigate difficult and unexpected situations.
Each and every project comes with difficulties and challenges. This is when communication and decision making is very important. Channel of communication has to be opened. Team members should have clear idea and able to communicate whatever they are encountering during the project, here the problem and difficulties would be know then decision on the solution has to be made. Project manager has to be bold on his making of decision for the sake of meeting the objectives of the project. Some decisions are always hard to be made but it must be. Nothing is important than the project. Even if the best decision is to stop the project for a while, it has to be done.
Just as we face face difficulties in our day to day activities, so is it with handling Projects as a Project Manager.
A Project Manager is saddled, faced with difficult, yet painful decisions that could help in taking final decisions.
A Project Manager could be forced take the following difficult decisions;
*To terminate a project if demand is equal to resource or Resource persons. But first off, Options to continue or terminate a project should be given consideration by putting them side by side and weighing them.
*Prioritization due to evolving times in the process mechanism and technology might impact on having to make difficult considerations and conclusions.
*Analysis of if the skills set and tools are still applicable to the present ones or has any relevance in being applied.
I believe there are other ways these difficulties can be addressed and basically, I believe Resource smoothing should be used to preserve the project deadline only that extra costs will be incurred.
Just as we face face difficulties in our day to day activities, so is it with handling Projects as a Project Manager.
A Project Manager is saddled, faced with difficult, yet painful decisions that could help in taking final decisions.
A Project Manager could be forced take the following difficult decisions;
*To terminate a project if demand is equal to resource or Resource persons. But first off, Options to continue or terminate a project should be given consideration by putting them side by side and weighing them.
*Prioritization due to evolving times in the process mechanism and technology might impact on having to make difficult considerations and conclusions.
*Analysis of if the skills set and tools are still applicable to the present ones or has any relevance in being applied.
I believe there are other ways these difficulties can be addressed and basically, I believe Resource smoothing should be used to preserve the project deadline only that extra costs will be incurred.
Every project has its ups and down and as such sometimes a project manager may experience challenges but in the midst of those challenges, tough decision must be made and so, the project manager should communicate and collaborate with the team in a positive and calm way
Every project is unique so challenges would be different .the project managers in the previous video would have acted differently though it will still be within the ethical values of the organization.
Reflecting on the most important objective of the Project
Clear and consistent communication with stakeholders
Remaining ethical while making decisions
If was in their shoe, I would taken such decision they took or think of some other best way to address the challenge.
As project manager in a construction space, Decision making whether its difficult or simple should be communicated to before or after to the stakeholders .
Any decision we are making should have human face in it i.e our environment.